refactor: use correct typing notation for args and kwargs

[cesarcoatl]

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

• The commit message follows our commit message format.

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Code style update (formatting, local variables)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• Build related changes
• CI related changes
• Documentation content changes
• Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Use correct typing notation for *args and **kwargs.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

Other information

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

Merging this PR leaves code quality unchanged.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	0.02 ⭐	0.02 ⭐	0.00
Method Length	11.49 ⭐	11.49 ⭐	0.00
Working memory	2.86 ⭐	2.86 ⭐	0.00
Quality	98.65% ⭐	98.65% ⭐	0.00%

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	5580	5580	0

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
src/com/inductiveautomation/factorypmi/application/script/builtin/init.py	98.83% ⭐	98.83% ⭐	0.00%
src/com/inductiveautomation/ignition/common/init.py	98.22% ⭐	98.22% ⭐	0.00%
src/com/inductiveautomation/ignition/common/alarming/init.py	99.49% ⭐	99.49% ⭐	0.00%
src/com/inductiveautomation/ignition/common/alarming/evaluation/init.py	98.92% ⭐	98.92% ⭐	0.00%
src/com/inductiveautomation/ignition/common/alarming/query/init.py	99.80% ⭐	99.80% ⭐	0.00%
src/com/inductiveautomation/ignition/common/browsing/init.py	97.92% ⭐	97.92% ⭐	0.00%
src/com/inductiveautomation/ignition/common/config/init.py	97.07% ⭐	97.07% ⭐	0.00%
src/com/inductiveautomation/ignition/common/gson/init.py	99.71% ⭐	99.71% ⭐	0.00%
src/com/inductiveautomation/ignition/common/i18n/init.py	99.53% ⭐	99.53% ⭐	0.00%
src/com/inductiveautomation/ignition/common/messages/init.py	97.72% ⭐	97.72% ⭐	0.00%
src/com/inductiveautomation/ignition/common/model/values/init.py	99.23% ⭐	99.23% ⭐	0.00%
src/com/inductiveautomation/ignition/common/opc/init.py	98.76% ⭐	98.76% ⭐	0.00%
src/com/inductiveautomation/ignition/common/script/adapters/init.py	99.16% ⭐	99.16% ⭐	0.00%
src/com/inductiveautomation/ignition/common/script/builtin/init.py	97.77% ⭐	97.77% ⭐	0.00%
src/com/inductiveautomation/ignition/common/user/init.py	97.78% ⭐	97.78% ⭐	0.00%
src/com/inductiveautomation/ignition/common/util/init.py	98.13% ⭐	98.13% ⭐	0.00%
src/com/inductiveautomation/ignition/modules/serial/scripting/init.py	96.11% ⭐	96.11% ⭐	0.00%
src/java/awt/init.py	97.94% ⭐	97.94% ⭐	0.00%
src/java/awt/image/init.py	99.00% ⭐	99.00% ⭐	0.00%
src/java/io/init.py	99.16% ⭐	99.16% ⭐	0.00%
src/java/lang/init.py	98.23% ⭐	98.23% ⭐	0.00%
src/java/net/init.py	99.45% ⭐	99.45% ⭐	0.00%
src/java/util/init.py	98.83% ⭐	98.83% ⭐	0.00%
src/javax/swing/init.py	96.09% ⭐	96.09% ⭐	0.00%
src/org/apache/commons/math3/exception/init.py	97.59% ⭐	97.59% ⭐	0.00%
src/org/python/core/init.py	99.18% ⭐	99.18% ⭐	0.00%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
src/javax/swing/init.py	JOptionPane.showOptionDialog	0 ⭐	44 ⭐	11 😞	75.56% ⭐	Extract out complex expressions
src/javax/swing/init.py	JOptionPane.showInputDialog	0 ⭐	38 ⭐	10 😞	78.43% ⭐	Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!