Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

allow multiple named export through variable deconstructing fixes #342 #350

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

gavriguy
Copy link
Contributor

This PR fixes #342 by allowing to export more than one variable using variable deconstructing

@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
'use strict'

import get from 'lodash.get'
// import forEach from 'lodash.forEach'
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You missed removing a comment here :)

@jfmengels
Copy link
Collaborator

jfmengels commented May 19, 2016

Not that familiar with this export syntax so I don't know if there are caveats, but LGTM (once the extra comment has been removed 😄). Thanks @gavriguy!

@benmosher
Copy link
Member

Might want to hold off, this duplicates #343 which already solved #342, I think? (If not, can you work from that branch as a start?)

@gavriguy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oops didn't see the progress that was made - I'll hold off in favor of #343. @scottnonnenberg feel free to take anything from this PR. and please let me know if you need any help.

@gavriguy gavriguy closed this May 19, 2016
benmosher added a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

prefer-default-export doesn't understand destructoring
3 participants