Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cli git ignore .gem #534

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024
Merged

cli git ignore .gem #534

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

rpassas
Copy link
Contributor

@rpassas rpassas commented Sep 30, 2024

Summary

Adding gitignore for .gem files so they do not accidentally get tracked when the template is used for new test kits

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.00%. Comparing base (4ab105d) to head (41f808c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #534   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.00%   84.00%           
=======================================
  Files         260      260           
  Lines       11361    11361           
  Branches     1252     1252           
=======================================
  Hits         9544     9544           
  Misses       1807     1807           
  Partials       10       10           
Flag Coverage Δ
backend 92.11% <ø> (ø)
frontend 79.32% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rpassas rpassas merged commit 2314a5c into main Oct 2, 2024
10 checks passed
@rpassas rpassas deleted the fi-3183-ignore-gem-new branch October 2, 2024 13:53
@Shaumik-Ashraf Shaumik-Ashraf mentioned this pull request Oct 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants