Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(inputs.mock): Add sine phase #15990

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2024

Conversation

LarsStegman
Copy link
Contributor

@LarsStegman LarsStegman commented Oct 7, 2024

Summary

Add a phase to the sine mock, so multiple signals can be mocked which are slightly out of phase.

Checklist

  • No AI generated code was used in this PR

Related issues

resolves #

@telegraf-tiger telegraf-tiger bot added feat Improvement on an existing feature such as adding a new setting/mode to an existing plugin plugin/input 1. Request for new input plugins 2. Issues/PRs that are related to input plugins labels Oct 7, 2024
Copy link
Member

@srebhan srebhan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks @LarsStegman!

@srebhan srebhan added the ready for final review This pull request has been reviewed and/or tested by multiple users and is ready for a final review. label Oct 7, 2024
@DStrand1 DStrand1 merged commit 391b4b8 into influxdata:master Oct 7, 2024
26 of 27 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v1.33.0 milestone Oct 7, 2024
asaharn pushed a commit to asaharn/telegraf that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feat Improvement on an existing feature such as adding a new setting/mode to an existing plugin plugin/input 1. Request for new input plugins 2. Issues/PRs that are related to input plugins ready for final review This pull request has been reviewed and/or tested by multiple users and is ready for a final review.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants