Add ability to pass default_action (if HTTP_SOAPACTION undefined)

[maxd]

Hello,

I have read #24 and implemented idea described in comment.

I can't pass HTTP_SOAPACTION because I am not owner of code. So, need to have solution to prevent this problem on my side.

Thanks

P.S.
Workaround with Rack middleware looks like guerrilla patch and I don' want to use it in my project.

[inossidabile]

How do you get a request without HTTP_SOAPACTION? It violates SOAP format. Why do you expect WashOut to support and respond such request?

[maxd]

Qiwi Wallet (Russian payment system) send it. I don't think that they will change it for me, so required solution on my side.

Are you absolutely sure that HTTP_SOAPACTION is only one way to determine called action?

[inossidabile]

Can you provide a dump of such request? Since it's a public system, you shouldn't be blocked by any agreements.

We'll do whatever it takes to help you since who cares about standards when they not work? I mean WashOut should be usable and not "strict-compliant". I just want to be sure we make a proper workaround if we go against spec.

[maxd]

Yes, sure. I will try to dump requests evening.

[inossidabile]

👍 💃

[maxd]

I have dumped SOAP request.

As you can see SOAPAction header is empty. Also I have found the following post about situation with this header: http://michelchristianen.blogspot.ru/2011/02/understanding-soapaction-mystery_5785.html

So, SOAPAction header using for optimize processing of requests in proxies or firewalls. Therefore need to use SOAP method name from Envelope body. Can you implement this?

I close my pull-request.

[inossidabile]

I'll keep it open unless everything that solves this is implemented. And yes, I'll take my hands on it, thank you.

[inossidabile]

0.9.0.beta-2 released. Please try.

[mhenrixon]

Thanks this solves an issue I was running into right now.

[inossidabile]

@mhenrixon awesome! :)