Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ETCM-995] move isInChain into BlockchainBranch #1052

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 16, 2021

Conversation

AurelienRichez
Copy link
Contributor

@AurelienRichez AurelienRichez commented Jul 12, 2021

Description

Move isInChain function to BlockchainBranch

Depends on #1039

@AurelienRichez AurelienRichez changed the title move isInChain into BlockchainBranch [ETCM-995] move isInChain into BlockchainBranch Jul 12, 2021
@AurelienRichez AurelienRichez force-pushed the refactor/ETCM-969-read-layer branch from c62dad2 to 985804f Compare July 13, 2021 13:00
@AurelienRichez AurelienRichez force-pushed the refactor/ETCM-995-move-isInChain branch from c6bff1c to 44762a8 Compare July 13, 2021 15:36
@AurelienRichez AurelienRichez force-pushed the refactor/ETCM-969-read-layer branch from 985804f to d0ce7ff Compare July 15, 2021 06:51
@AurelienRichez AurelienRichez force-pushed the refactor/ETCM-969-read-layer branch from d0ce7ff to 00cb79e Compare July 16, 2021 07:04
Base automatically changed from refactor/ETCM-969-read-layer to develop July 16, 2021 08:26
@AurelienRichez AurelienRichez force-pushed the refactor/ETCM-995-move-isInChain branch from 44762a8 to 75b3e40 Compare July 16, 2021 14:37
@AurelienRichez AurelienRichez force-pushed the refactor/ETCM-995-move-isInChain branch from 75b3e40 to 02d16ce Compare July 16, 2021 14:46
@AurelienRichez AurelienRichez merged commit 0632b10 into develop Jul 16, 2021
@AurelienRichez AurelienRichez deleted the refactor/ETCM-995-move-isInChain branch July 16, 2021 15:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants