Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ETCM-266]-replaced-rate-limiter-built-on-twitter #873
[ETCM-266]-replaced-rate-limiter-built-on-twitter #873
Changes from 14 commits
cf27856
b04bc3d
f7e0a69
59dc8df
16bddee
10fb166
d9584ca
c61ec05
405a76a
202f5ac
ec001ba
0929963
4df7be8
711867d
c645eed
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a minor comment, we can reduce this line:
complete((StatusCodes.TooManyRequests, JsonRpcError.RateLimitError(minInterval)))
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually it was inline in the beginning, but I've decided that the code is quite unreadable :)
IMHO this will not affect performance and the compiler will inline it anyway because it is used once, immediately after creation. Maybe it would be better to construct a kind of builder for responses instead of serializable
Tuple
s. WDYT?