Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust ylim defaults in g_km when yval = "Failure" #1028

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 10, 2023

Conversation

edelarua
Copy link
Contributor

@edelarua edelarua commented Aug 9, 2023

Closes #1027

@edelarua edelarua added the sme label Aug 9, 2023
@edelarua edelarua enabled auto-merge (squash) August 9, 2023 22:03
@edelarua edelarua added the core label Aug 9, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 9, 2023

badge

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                                   Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
---------------------------------------  -------  ------  -------  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R/abnormal_by_baseline.R                      63       0  100.00%
R/abnormal_by_marked.R                        53       5  90.57%   115-119
R/abnormal_by_worst_grade_worsen.R           114       3  97.37%   233-235
R/abnormal_by_worst_grade.R                   38       0  100.00%
R/abnormal.R                                  41       0  100.00%
R/analyze_variables.R                        220       2  99.09%   273, 499
R/analyze_vars_in_cols.R                     120      22  81.67%   164, 188-193, 206, 219-225, 276-282
R/combination_function.R                       9       0  100.00%
R/compare_variables.R                        139       5  96.40%   126-127, 137, 241, 259
R/control_incidence_rate.R                    20       8  60.00%   32-35, 38-41
R/control_logistic.R                           7       0  100.00%
R/control_step.R                              23       1  95.65%   58
R/control_survival.R                          15       0  100.00%
R/count_cumulative.R                          48       1  97.92%   63
R/count_missed_doses.R                        32       0  100.00%
R/count_occurrences_by_grade.R                85       6  92.94%   156-158, 161, 176-177
R/count_occurrences.R                         62       1  98.39%   92
R/count_patients_events_in_cols.R             67       1  98.51%   62
R/count_patients_with_event.R                 34       0  100.00%
R/count_patients_with_flags.R                 45       4  91.11%   71-72, 77-78
R/count_values.R                              25       0  100.00%
R/cox_regression_inter.R                     154       0  100.00%
R/cox_regression.R                           161       0  100.00%
R/coxph.R                                    167       7  95.81%   191-195, 239, 254, 262, 268-269
R/d_pkparam.R                                406       0  100.00%
R/decorate_grob.R                            169      40  76.33%   232-263, 323-325, 332, 353-390
R/desctools_binom_diff.R                     663      66  90.05%   55, 90-91, 131-132, 135, 214, 240-249, 288, 290, 310, 314, 318, 322, 378, 381, 384, 387, 448, 456, 468-469, 475-478, 486, 489, 498, 501, 549-550, 552-553, 555-556, 558-559, 629, 641-654, 659, 706, 719, 723
R/df_explicit_na.R                            30       0  100.00%
R/estimate_multinomial_rsp.R                  48       1  97.92%   60
R/estimate_proportion.R                      200      12  94.00%   75-82, 86, 91, 296, 463, 568
R/fit_rsp_step.R                              36       0  100.00%
R/fit_survival_step.R                         36       0  100.00%
R/formatting_functions.R                     115       2  98.26%   145, 155
R/g_forest.R                                 437      23  94.74%   197, 248-249, 316, 333-334, 339-340, 353, 369, 416, 447, 523, 532, 613-617, 627, 702, 705, 829
R/g_lineplot.R                               199      29  85.43%   160, 173, 201, 227-230, 307-314, 332-333, 339-349, 441, 449
R/g_step.R                                    68       1  98.53%   109
R/g_waterfall.R                               47       0  100.00%
R/h_adsl_adlb_merge_using_worst_flag.R        74       0  100.00%
R/h_biomarkers_subgroups.R                    40       0  100.00%
R/h_cox_regression.R                         110       0  100.00%
R/h_logistic_regression.R                    468       3  99.36%   206-207, 276
R/h_map_for_count_abnormal.R                  54       0  100.00%
R/h_pkparam_sort.R                            15       0  100.00%
R/h_response_biomarkers_subgroups.R           75       0  100.00%
R/h_response_subgroups.R                     171      12  92.98%   257-270
R/h_stack_by_baskets.R                        65       1  98.46%   91
R/h_step.R                                   180       0  100.00%
R/h_survival_biomarkers_subgroups.R           79       0  100.00%
R/h_survival_duration_subgroups.R            200      12  94.00%   259-271
R/incidence_rate.R                            94       7  92.55%   55-62
R/individual_patient_plot.R                  133       0  100.00%
R/kaplan_meier_plot.R                        646      64  90.09%   226-229, 269-304, 313-317, 517, 704-706, 714-716, 748-749, 921, 1110, 1427-1438
R/logistic_regression.R                      101       0  100.00%
R/missing_data.R                              21       3  85.71%   32, 66, 76
R/odds_ratio.R                               107       0  100.00%
R/prop_diff_test.R                            89       0  100.00%
R/prop_diff.R                                261      16  93.87%   72-75, 107, 269-276, 415, 475, 580
R/prune_occurrences.R                         57      10  82.46%   138-142, 188-192
R/response_biomarkers_subgroups.R             60       0  100.00%
R/response_subgroups.R                       165       4  97.58%   273, 315-317
R/rtables_access.R                            38       4  89.47%   159-162
R/score_occurrences.R                         20       1  95.00%   124
R/split_cols_by_groups.R                      49       0  100.00%
R/stat.R                                      47       3  93.62%   73-74, 129
R/summarize_ancova.R                          96       1  98.96%   180
R/summarize_change.R                          28       0  100.00%
R/summarize_colvars.R                          6       0  100.00%
R/summarize_coxreg.R                         165       2  98.79%   198, 420
R/summarize_glm_count.R                      165       4  97.58%   159, 164, 208, 261
R/summarize_num_patients.R                    75       9  88.00%   103-105, 150-151, 218-223
R/summarize_patients_exposure_in_cols.R       97       1  98.97%   56
R/survival_biomarkers_subgroups.R             60       0  100.00%
R/survival_coxph_pairwise.R                   74       9  87.84%   59-67
R/survival_duration_subgroups.R              172       0  100.00%
R/survival_time.R                             48       0  100.00%
R/survival_timepoint.R                       118       7  94.07%   126-132
R/utils_checkmate.R                           68       0  100.00%
R/utils_factor.R                              87       1  98.85%   84
R/utils_grid.R                               111       5  95.50%   149, 258-264
R/utils_rtables.R                             86       7  91.86%   24, 31-35, 346-347
R/utils.R                                    137      10  92.70%   92, 94, 98, 118, 121, 124, 128, 137-138, 311
TOTAL                                       9208     436  95.26%

Diff against main

Filename                 Stmts    Miss  Cover
---------------------  -------  ------  -------
R/kaplan_meier_plot.R       +2       0  +0.03%
TOTAL                       +2       0  +0.00%

Results for commit: 1922cd7

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 9, 2023

Unit Tests Summary

       1 files    78 suites   1m 38s ⏱️
   743 tests 742 ✔️     1 💤 0
1 575 runs  988 ✔️ 587 💤 0

Results for commit 9dd3e46.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@

See below for the list of formatting functions created in \code{tern} to work with \code{rtables}.

Other available formats can be listed via \code{\link[formatters:list_valid_format_labels]{formatters::list_valid_format_labels()}}. Additional
Other available formats can be listed via \code{\link[formatters:list_formats]{formatters::list_valid_format_labels()}}. Additional
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

did this change?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it did not right?

Copy link
Contributor

@Melkiades Melkiades left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For me it is good! Thanks Emily :) remember to add a news entry as it was a bug

@edelarua edelarua merged commit 462b206 into main Aug 10, 2023
@edelarua edelarua deleted the 1027_g_km_ylim_failure@main branch August 10, 2023 07:44
@edelarua edelarua mentioned this pull request Aug 10, 2023
@shajoezhu shajoezhu mentioned this pull request Jun 27, 2023
18 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature Request]: g_km default ylim value should change when yval = "Failure"
2 participants