-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement na_str
argument in all columnwise analysis functions
#1140
Conversation
Code Coverage Summary
Diff against main
Results for commit: c207924 Minimum allowed coverage is ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results |
Unit Test Performance DifferenceAdditional test case details
Results for commit 1e49617 ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
Updated output from issue example:
|
@@ -136,13 +136,12 @@ | |||
Median 32.0 23.9 20.8 24.9 | |||
95% CI (22.6, 53.4) (18.3, 32.9) (12.9, 26.0) (21.5, 31.7) | |||
25% and 75%-ile 17.4, 65.3 9.8, 42.7 7.3, 37.1 11.5, 49.3 | |||
Range 0.3 to 155.5 {1} 0.1 to 154.1 {2} 0.6 to 80.7 {3} 0.1 to 155.5 {4} | |||
Range 0.3 to 155.5 {1} 0.1 to 154.1 {2} 0.6 to 80.7 {3} 0.1 to 155.5 {1} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why did this escape :D
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lgtm!! :)) Thanks Emily for this swift fix of na_str in colvars. I think if there are still some functions w/o we can still add it at a later time
Pull Request
Fixes #1139
Merge after insightsengineering/rtables#791