Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update module github.com/onsi/gomega to v1.20.2 #677

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 5, 2022

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 20, 2022

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
github.com/onsi/gomega require minor v1.19.0 -> v1.20.2

Release Notes

onsi/gomega

v1.20.2

Compare Source

1.20.2

Fixes

  • label specs that rely on remote access; bump timeout on short-circuit test to make it less flaky [35eeadf]
  • gexec: allow more headroom for SIGABRT-related unit tests (#​581) [5b78f40]
  • Enable reading from a closed gbytes.Buffer (#​575) [061fd26]

Maintenance

  • Bump github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 from 2.1.5 to 2.1.6 (#​583) [55d895b]
  • Bump github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 from 2.1.4 to 2.1.5 (#​582) [346de7c]

v1.20.1

Compare Source

1.20.1

Fixes

Maintenance

v1.20.0

Compare Source

Features

Fixes

Maintenance

1.19.0

Features

  • New HaveEach matcher to ensure that each and every element in an array, slice, or map satisfies the passed in matcher. (#​523) [9fc2ae2] (#​524) [c8ba582]
  • Users can now wrap the Gomega interface to implement custom behavior on each assertion. (#​521) [1f2e714]
  • ContainElement now accepts an additional pointer argument. Elements that satisfy the matcher are stored in the pointer enabling developers to easily add subsequent, more detailed, assertions against the matching element. (#​527) [1a4e27f]

Fixes


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Failed to deploy pr-677/app2

Failed:
one or more objects failed to apply, reason: Deployment.apps "echoserver" is invalid: spec.selector: Invalid value: v1.LabelSelecto
https://argocd.example.com/applications/app2

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Failed to deploy pr-677/app2

Failed:
one or more objects failed to apply, reason: Deployment.apps "echoserver" is invalid: spec.selector: Invalid value: v1.LabelSelecto
https://argocd.example.com/applications/app2

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/git.luolix.top-onsi-gomega-1.x branch from 03f7114 to 701f24f Compare July 29, 2022 19:50
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Failed to deploy pr-677/app2

Failed:
one or more objects failed to apply, reason: Deployment.apps "echoserver" is invalid: spec.selector: Invalid value: v1.LabelSelecto
https://argocd.example.com/applications/app2

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/git.luolix.top-onsi-gomega-1.x branch from 701f24f to 05935df Compare July 29, 2022 21:56
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Failed to deploy pr-677/app2

Failed:
one or more objects failed to apply, reason: Deployment.apps "echoserver" is invalid: spec.selector: Invalid value: v1.LabelSelecto
https://argocd.example.com/applications/app2

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 6, 2022

❌ Failed to deploy pr-677/app2

Failed:
one or more objects failed to apply, reason: Deployment.apps "echoserver" is invalid: spec.selector: Invalid value: v1.LabelSelecto
https://argocd.example.com/applications/app2

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 8, 2022

❌ Failed to deploy pr-677/app2

Failed:
one or more objects failed to apply, reason: Deployment.apps "echoserver" is invalid: spec.selector: Invalid value: v1.LabelSelecto
https://argocd.example.com/applications/app2

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 9, 2022

❌ Failed to deploy pr-677/app2

Failed:
one or more objects failed to apply, reason: Deployment.apps "echoserver" is invalid: spec.selector: Invalid value: v1.LabelSelecto
https://argocd.example.com/applications/app2

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/git.luolix.top-onsi-gomega-1.x branch from daf0048 to 2425c64 Compare August 11, 2022 21:41
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/git.luolix.top-onsi-gomega-1.x branch 2 times, most recently from b1d7c91 to 12a20a7 Compare September 4, 2022 12:58
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/git.luolix.top-onsi-gomega-1.x branch from 12a20a7 to 2c8c166 Compare September 4, 2022 16:15
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/git.luolix.top-onsi-gomega-1.x branch from 2c8c166 to 5911020 Compare September 4, 2022 20:28
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/git.luolix.top-onsi-gomega-1.x branch from 5911020 to 01650b7 Compare September 4, 2022 22:15
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/git.luolix.top-onsi-gomega-1.x branch from 01650b7 to 8662353 Compare September 5, 2022 02:33
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/git.luolix.top-onsi-gomega-1.x branch from 8662353 to 8e237b0 Compare September 5, 2022 06:03
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/git.luolix.top-onsi-gomega-1.x branch from 8e237b0 to c611254 Compare September 5, 2022 13:35
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/git.luolix.top-onsi-gomega-1.x branch from c611254 to 2aa339e Compare September 5, 2022 13:43
@renovate renovate bot merged commit d2c83e3 into master Sep 5, 2022
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/git.luolix.top-onsi-gomega-1.x branch September 5, 2022 20:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants