-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 764
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue template tweak #1422
Merged
Merged
Issue template tweak #1422
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kfcampbell
added
the
Type: Documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
label
Dec 9, 2022
TheQueenIsDead
pushed a commit
to TheQueenIsDead/terraform-provider-github
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2022
* Don't link to a real PR * Wording tweak
kazaker
pushed a commit
to auto1-oss/terraform-provider-github
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 28, 2022
* Don't link to a real PR * Wording tweak
kfcampbell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 20, 2023
* feat: add new schema for check block resource under required_status_checks * feat: iterate provided `check` blocks and build array of RequiredStatusCheck * feat: set default app_id to -1 * feat: implement checks flattening for required status checks * Add resource github_app_installation_repositories (#1376) * Add resource github_app_installation_repositories This resource allows multiple repositories to be passed in; which greatly improves the performance of the resource compared to the single repository version when needing to control state of multiple app installations with multiple repos, required in larger organisations. The optimisation occurs as only a single call to get the list of repos is required per installation per read, regardless of the number of respositories being added. - Add resource_github_app_installation_repositories - Add tests * Update docs and link Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com> * feat: adds new branch protection options for last reviewer and locking branch (#1407) Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com> * feat(github_release): adding github_release resource and tests (#1122) * feat(github_release): adding github_release resource and tests * feat(docs) adding github_release page to website docs * chore: update changelog with this pr's new resource * fix: adding node_id and release_id to resource attributes * Update CHANGELOG.md * Fix broken merge/build Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com> * 🚧 Workflows have changed Workflow changes have been made in the Octokit org repo. This PR is propagating those changes. * Issue template tweak (#1422) * Don't link to a real PR * Wording tweak * feat: allow branch protection check app_id to be null * chore: change branch protection flatten function to use GetAppID sdk method * feat: change branch protection v3 utils to flatten and expand contexts into checks * feat: change checks from it's own resource to a list of strings * chore: resolve incorrect merge of main * chore: update deprecation notice on contexts array * chore(docs): Update branch_protection_v3 docs to mention the new `checks` functionality * fix: Initialise literal empty slice of RequiredStatusCheck to mitigate errors when passing nil to the sdk * chore(lint): resolve gosimple S1082 violation (errors.New => fmt.Errorf) * chore: remove unused code comment Co-authored-by: David Bain <97858950+david-bain@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com> Co-authored-by: Sean Smith <sean@wwsean08.com> Co-authored-by: Trent Millar <trent.millar@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Nick Floyd <139819+nickfloyd@users.noreply.github.com>
avidspartan1
pushed a commit
to avidspartan1/terraform-provider-github
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2024
* Don't link to a real PR * Wording tweak
avidspartan1
pushed a commit
to avidspartan1/terraform-provider-github
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2024
* feat: add new schema for check block resource under required_status_checks * feat: iterate provided `check` blocks and build array of RequiredStatusCheck * feat: set default app_id to -1 * feat: implement checks flattening for required status checks * Add resource github_app_installation_repositories (integrations#1376) * Add resource github_app_installation_repositories This resource allows multiple repositories to be passed in; which greatly improves the performance of the resource compared to the single repository version when needing to control state of multiple app installations with multiple repos, required in larger organisations. The optimisation occurs as only a single call to get the list of repos is required per installation per read, regardless of the number of respositories being added. - Add resource_github_app_installation_repositories - Add tests * Update docs and link Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com> * feat: adds new branch protection options for last reviewer and locking branch (integrations#1407) Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com> * feat(github_release): adding github_release resource and tests (integrations#1122) * feat(github_release): adding github_release resource and tests * feat(docs) adding github_release page to website docs * chore: update changelog with this pr's new resource * fix: adding node_id and release_id to resource attributes * Update CHANGELOG.md * Fix broken merge/build Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com> * 🚧 Workflows have changed Workflow changes have been made in the Octokit org repo. This PR is propagating those changes. * Issue template tweak (integrations#1422) * Don't link to a real PR * Wording tweak * feat: allow branch protection check app_id to be null * chore: change branch protection flatten function to use GetAppID sdk method * feat: change branch protection v3 utils to flatten and expand contexts into checks * feat: change checks from it's own resource to a list of strings * chore: resolve incorrect merge of main * chore: update deprecation notice on contexts array * chore(docs): Update branch_protection_v3 docs to mention the new `checks` functionality * fix: Initialise literal empty slice of RequiredStatusCheck to mitigate errors when passing nil to the sdk * chore(lint): resolve gosimple S1082 violation (errors.New => fmt.Errorf) * chore: remove unused code comment Co-authored-by: David Bain <97858950+david-bain@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com> Co-authored-by: Sean Smith <sean@wwsean08.com> Co-authored-by: Trent Millar <trent.millar@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Nick Floyd <139819+nickfloyd@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I was confused for a while why so many issues like this one were linking to #1234; then I realized it was a placeholder number that we've now passed in our real issues/PRs. This small change tweaks the wording a bit and adds another two digits to the example issue linked.
Behavior
Before the change?
After the change?
Other information
Additional info
Pull request checklist
Does this introduce a breaking change?
Please see our docs on breaking changes to help!
Type: Breaking change
label)If
Yes
, what's the impact:Pull request type
Please add the corresponding label for change this PR introduces:
Type: Bug
Type: Feature
Type: Documentation
Type: Maintenance