No more inappropriate content in kids carousel

[tabshaikh]

Closes #2820

Technical

removed preset:children and added subject(Juvenile Fiction) in query

Stakeholders

@mekarpeles

[tfmorris]

#3 in the Juvenile Fiction carousel is Shakespeare's Macbeth which doesn't really seem appropriate, so I think we need to be a little more discriminating.

[seabelis]

#3 in the Juvenile Fiction carousel is Shakespeare's Macbeth which doesn't really seem appropriate, so I think we need to be a little more discriminating.

I think that might be from adaptations that are/were associated with the work. I see this frequently, but unless the associated editions are moved to another work, I think the subject tags eventually repopulate if removed. I've gone through Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet, and Tempest with a fairly fine-toothed comb, but it's a bit like herding cats and not possible to maintain at scale. Additionally, texts used in schools frequently have the Juvenile Fiction subject tag as well even if they are not particularly childish.

I think there is no perfect solution without using managed taxonomy. It's an improvement, so let's not make perfect the enemy of good. JUVENILE LITERATURE would broaden the results to include non-fiction which might be nice. Or if the objective is to populate the carousel with picture books, use that as the subject. https://openlibrary.org/subjects/picture_books

[cdrini]

Note that this maps to an archive.org query; not an OL query. So it's not related to https://openlibrary.org/subjects/juvenile_fiction .

[mekarpeles]

LGTM, we can address remaining issues archive.org side (such as those mentioned). Thank you @tabshaikh!