Improve external links from MARC imports #6517
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hornc
added
Theme: MARC records
Module: Import
hornc
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
856$y(Link text) as the preferred link title856$x(Nonpublic note) as the last resort fallback if nothing better existsexample DNB import which prompted this:
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL37853872M
It has 3 external links, two of them have
856$xwhich were not picked up from the MARC record.https://openlibrary.org/show-records/marc_dnb_202006/dnb_all_dnbmarc_20200615-4.mrc:10356060428:1529
Technical
Reference:
https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd856.html
and guide:
https://www.loc.gov/marc/856guide.html
Testing
Screenshot
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL37853872M
Before:
After:
Stakeholders