Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[action] simplify address generation #3913

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 4, 2023
Merged

Conversation

dustinxie
Copy link
Member

@dustinxie dustinxie commented Aug 2, 2023

Description

noticed this while working on #3910

Fixes #(issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • [] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • [] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Code refactor or improvement
  • [] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause a new or changed behavior of existing functionality)
  • [] This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • make test
  • [] fullsync
  • [] Other test (please specify)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Aug 2, 2023

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.    Quality Gate failed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
6.0% 6.0% Duplication

idea Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension sonarlint SonarLint

@@ -16,16 +16,16 @@ import (
"github.com/iotexproject/iotex-core/pkg/version"
)

var (
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

var is placed in front of type

// RewardingPoolTopic is topic for rewarding pool
RewardingPoolTopic = hash.BytesToHash256(address.RewardingProtocolAddrHash[:])
)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

defined but not used at all

data, err := cr.encodeABIBinary()
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return types.NewTransaction(cr.Nonce(), ethAddr, big.NewInt(0), cr.GasLimit(), cr.GasPrice(), data), nil
return types.NewTransaction(cr.Nonce(), _stakingProtocolEthAddr, big.NewInt(0), cr.GasLimit(), cr.GasPrice(), data), nil
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

easier way of generating the address

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 2, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #3913 (c7e4f10) into master (e1f0636) will increase coverage by 0.64%.
Report is 76 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is 73.30%.

❗ Current head c7e4f10 differs from pull request most recent head c557728. Consider uploading reports for the commit c557728 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3913      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.38%   76.02%   +0.64%     
==========================================
  Files         303      327      +24     
  Lines       25923    27822    +1899     
==========================================
+ Hits        19541    21152    +1611     
- Misses       5360     5578     +218     
- Partials     1022     1092      +70     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
action/protocol/execution/evm/evm.go 43.52% <0.00%> (-2.95%) ⬇️
action/protocol/execution/evm/evmstatedbadapter.go 66.77% <ø> (ø)
action/protocol/poll/consortium.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
action/protocol/poll/staking_committee.go 43.85% <0.00%> (ø)
...tion/protocol/staking/contractstake_bucket_type.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
action/receipt.go 82.17% <ø> (ø)
api/grpcserver.go 86.40% <0.00%> (ø)
api/loglistener.go 25.00% <0.00%> (ø)
api/web3server_marshal.go 93.21% <ø> (ø)
api/websocket.go 4.10% <0.00%> (-1.07%) ⬇️
... and 63 more

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

Copy link
Member

@envestcc envestcc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

so, ioAddr and ethAddr have the same hash, but the String() are different, right?

@dustinxie
Copy link
Member Author

so, ioAddr and ethAddr have the same hash, but the String() are different, right?

yes, that's right, they have the same 20-byte hash. Ether's string is just the hex encoding, while IoTeX's string is the bech32 encoding of the underlying 20-byte hash

@dustinxie dustinxie merged commit daa0114 into iotexproject:master Aug 4, 2023
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants