Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[action] Define CandidateSelfStake Action #4007

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 2, 2024

Conversation

envestcc
Copy link
Member

@envestcc envestcc commented Dec 5, 2023

Description

As a part of implementation of #3981 , this pr defines the CandidateSelfStake action struct to make a candidate re-selfstaked

Fixes #(issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • [] make test
  • [] fullsync
  • [] Other test (please specify)

Test Configuration:

  • Firmware version:
  • Hardware:
  • Toolchain:
  • SDK:

Checklist:

  • [] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • [] I have performed a self-review of my code
  • [] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • [] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • [] My changes generate no new warnings
  • [] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • [] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • [] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@envestcc envestcc marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2023 08:12
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 532 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (e1f0636) 75.38% compared to head (8db7a36) 76.25%.
Report is 131 commits behind head on master.

Files Patch % Lines
blockindex/contractstaking/event_handler.go 67.23% 45 Missing and 13 partials ⚠️
action/protocol/staking/staking_statereader.go 69.76% 35 Missing and 17 partials ⚠️
action/protocol/execution/evm/evm.go 48.38% 47 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
action/protocol/staking/protocol.go 33.33% 28 Missing ⚠️
...tion/protocol/staking/contractstake_bucket_type.go 0.00% 24 Missing ⚠️
api/coreservice.go 68.49% 17 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
blockindex/contractstaking/util.go 39.47% 22 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
action/protocol/rewarding/fund.go 23.07% 19 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
api/websocket.go 0.00% 20 Missing ⚠️
blockindex/sgd_indexer.go 90.30% 12 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️
... and 30 more
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4007      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.38%   76.25%   +0.87%     
==========================================
  Files         303      331      +28     
  Lines       25923    28281    +2358     
==========================================
+ Hits        19541    21567    +2026     
- Misses       5360     5616     +256     
- Partials     1022     1098      +76     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

AbstractAction

// bucketID is the bucket index want to be changed to
bucketID uint64
Copy link
Member

@dustinxie dustinxie Dec 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does it need to carry a valid endorsement for the calling delegate? otherwise how to make sure the bucket is intended (to be used) for this delegate?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

endorsement info will be recorded in db by another transaction CandidateEndorse

},
bucketID: bucketID,
}
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also what about convert to/from protobuf (for storage)?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

another PR to handle web3 and grpc convertion

)

// CandidateSelfStake is the action to update a candidate's bucket
type CandidateSelfStake struct {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for clear naming, consider rename it to CandidateActivate. SelfStake refers to the self-stake bucket, which now can come from either register, or endorsement.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same. Updating the candidate's bucket isn't indicated by the naming

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay

@Liuhaai
Copy link
Member

Liuhaai commented Dec 28, 2023

fixed the issues before merging

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jan 2, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
2.9% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@envestcc envestcc merged commit c563333 into iotexproject:master Jan 2, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
@envestcc envestcc deleted the pr_defineselfstake branch January 2, 2024 02:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants