Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 16, 2020. It is now read-only.

Repo cleanup sprint session #11

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 8, 2018
Merged

Repo cleanup sprint session #11

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 8, 2018

Conversation

Mr0grog
Copy link
Contributor

@Mr0grog Mr0grog commented Jun 29, 2018

There are several issues where we’ve worked out some concrete ways we can improve the understandability and organization of the plethora of repos we have on GitHub, but we have failed to actually execute on them for each repo. Let’s have project owners (who have the rights to make changes to the description of a repo or archive a repo) sit down and just do that work. Since folks will be sitting down and working together, it gives everyone a good opportunity to quickly gut-check each other on things like whether a description is good or it makes sense to archive a repo.

@ghost ghost assigned Mr0grog Jun 29, 2018
- [Develop a standard way to indicate non-code repos (ipfs/docs#57)](https://github.com/ipfs/docs/issues/57)
- Make sure repos adhere to the [licensing policy](https://github.com/ipfs/community/blob/68f2fc02c4384eeb765ebc7547ea07f3aa2268c1/docs/licensing-policy.md), now that we have one :)

**Activity:** Work sprint.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we have a randomizer distributing X number of repos by each participant? It will get people to look at repos that they never looked before and have that new user perspective, leading to understand better the pain points. Then they can submit a PR for the deprecation and the admin can merge/make the final changes.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Mr0grog Mr0grog Jul 4, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then they can submit a PR for the deprecation and the admin can merge/make the final changes.

If not clear from the description, my intent here is really to lock repo owners in a room for a few minutes until they do this. :P

We could have other people make PRs, but I’ve been doing that for a while and they aren’t getting merged (those are all linked from the issues directly linked in the description).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Anyway, I guess what I’m saying is: having folks who don’t own these repos in this session could help scale it up slightly, but it feels to me like the real bottleneck is repo owners finding the time to just sit down and respond-to/implement/merge the proposals from those other folks.

My thought here was more like “let’s create a dedicated, short time block for those repo owners to focus on just doing that.”

@ghost ghost assigned daviddias Jul 8, 2018
@daviddias daviddias merged commit 57ffd21 into master Jul 8, 2018
@daviddias daviddias deleted the repo-cleanup-sprint branch July 8, 2018 17:20
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants