Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for CIDv1 #12

Closed
lidel opened this issue Sep 4, 2017 · 3 comments · Fixed by #13
Closed

Support for CIDv1 #12

lidel opened this issue Sep 4, 2017 · 3 comments · Fixed by #13
Labels
kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws)

Comments

@lidel
Copy link
Member

lidel commented Sep 4, 2017

As noted in ipfs/ipfs-companion#275, is-ipfs v0.3.0 is unaware of CIDv1.

References:

@lidel lidel added the kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws) label Sep 4, 2017
@daviddias
Copy link
Member

@fbaiodias wanna move this to the IPFS org so that more folks can help maintain it?

@fbaiodias
Copy link
Contributor

@diasdavid done https://github.com/ipfs/is-ipfs/ 😃

lidel added a commit to lidel/is-ipfs that referenced this issue Sep 10, 2017
@lidel lidel mentioned this issue Sep 10, 2017
@lidel
Copy link
Member Author

lidel commented Sep 10, 2017

Guys, please check if #13 looks okay.
If it does, we need a new release of is-ipfs with it 🌵

lidel added a commit to ipfs/ipfs-companion that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2017
Includes CID tests from ipfs-shipyard/is-ipfs#12
Partially solves #275
lidel added a commit to ipfs/ipfs-companion that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2017
Includes CID tests from ipfs-shipyard/is-ipfs#12
Partially solves #275
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants