-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Duplicate DNSLink TXT record #1053
Comments
I've removed duplicate DNS TXT records (for both .io and .tech), and the issue is resolved. I'm assuming a hiccup on the dnsimple end, but if we have this problem again, we need to investigate the https://www.npmjs.com/package/dnslink-dnsimple angle, maybe API changed, and we need to update that tool. |
It's happening again, I have no permissions to remove it. |
Seems related to API changes that DNSimple seems to have made a some point, and we discovered as part of https://github.com/protocol/bifrost-infra/issues/2814 and ipfs-shipyard/dnslink-dnsimple#21 |
We'll need to also update https://github.com/ipfs-shipyard/js-dnslink-dnsimple then (which after a |
Asked @olizilla to give me and @hacdias publishing rights to the NPM package, but JS necromancy can be a time sink. I'll open a PR later today. Update: see #1055 |
This solves problem described in ipfs/distributions#1053 by switching to new tool like we did in ipfs/distributions#1055
This solves problem described in ipfs/distributions#1053 by switching to new tool like we did in ipfs/distributions#1055
ipfs ls /ipns/dist.ipfs.tech/kubo/v0.24.0-rc2 is flaky because we have two dnslink TXT records for some reason:
DNS spec does not define order of records, and they are returned in random order.
If we are unlucky, we get old one which does not have the RC2, and ipfs ls returns with exit code 1 and error:
Could be some race condition in dnslink-dnsimple tool this Github Action use for updating DNSLink at DNSimple, or a bug in DNSSimple (our DNS host) itself.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: