Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 1, 2023. It is now read-only.

fix: update tests to support go-ipfs automatic sharding #382

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

aschmahmann
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@welcome

This comment has been minimized.

test/files.js Outdated
Comment on lines 12 to 15
const SHARD_THRESHOLD = 2000
// Use this to help push the shard threshold over the go-ipfs defaults
// without just adding lots of files
const shardFilePadding = "".padStart(100, '0')
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@achingbrain we could figure out adding a configurable sharding threshold in go-ipfs. However, this seemed like it wasn't super painful and wouldn't make tests take too much longer. WDYT?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Having a configurable sharding threshold makes things like the test added as part of ipfs/js-ipfs#3936 more feasible. One or two tests like this are not super painful, but twenty or thirty would be.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It also means you can do the whole test in code instead of having to deal with importing car files to get HAMTs that are *just so*. Doing it all in code means it's easy to run in environments without filesystems like browsers.

@aschmahmann aschmahmann force-pushed the fix/go-ipfs-automatic-sharding branch from 0b57851 to 69832a6 Compare October 13, 2021 21:58
Switch to version that includes
ipfs/js-ipfs#3936
@lidel lidel force-pushed the fix/go-ipfs-automatic-sharding branch from 742c0ba to f001775 Compare November 23, 2021 21:43
@lidel
Copy link
Member

lidel commented Nov 23, 2021

Continued with approach from #393 in #400

@lidel lidel closed this Nov 23, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants