Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Name bikeshedding #46

Closed
dignifiedquire opened this issue Sep 28, 2015 · 7 comments
Closed

Name bikeshedding #46

dignifiedquire opened this issue Sep 28, 2015 · 7 comments
Labels
kind/discussion Topical discussion; usually not changes to codebase

Comments

@dignifiedquire
Copy link
Member

electron-app is boring, lets find something cool and awesome :)

@dignifiedquire dignifiedquire added the kind/discussion Topical discussion; usually not changes to codebase label Sep 28, 2015
@jbenet
Copy link
Member

jbenet commented Sep 29, 2015

some suggestions:

  • Station
  • IPFS App
  • IPFS Node
  • IPFS
  • IPApp
  • INode

@bcomnes
Copy link
Contributor

bcomnes commented Sep 29, 2015

I would stick with capital IPFS. It's simple, and differentiates itself from the cli with capital letters. If ambiguity between the two becomes an an issue, maybe a codename like Station would be good.

I would keep the word node away from anything not specifically related to ipfs code written for node since its super confusing whenever I see that word in this project.

@RichardLitt
Copy link
Member

The capital // lowercase ambiguity will swiftly become an issue. Station is a good suggestion.

@dignifiedquire
Copy link
Member Author

I like station as well.

@dignifiedquire
Copy link
Member Author

station is sadly taken on npm already, we could go with ipfs-station or use a scoped package. I also contacted the author of the package: Marak/station#3 if he would be willing to give the name up.

@jbenet
Copy link
Member

jbenet commented Oct 6, 2015

I'd prefer using ipfs-station as a pkg name to scope all our modules. But we can still just use "Station" if we want to in the UI/ux (both "station" and "IPFS Station" sound great)


Sent from Mailbox

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Friedel Ziegelmayer
notifications@github.com wrote:

station is sadly taken on npm already, we could go with ipfs-station or use a scoped package. I also contacted the author of the package: Marak/station#3 if he would be willing to give the name up.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#46 (comment)

@daviddias daviddias modified the milestone: 1.0.0 Oct 12, 2015
@dignifiedquire
Copy link
Member Author

Done in 5a123c2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/discussion Topical discussion; usually not changes to codebase
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants