This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 12, 2024. It is now read-only.
fix: revert libp2p records being signed for ipns #1570
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ghost
assigned
5 tasks
vasco-santos
force-pushed
the
fix/revert-libp2p-records-for-ipns-should-be-signed
branch
from
e344116
to
ce9fb25
Compare
alanshaw
approved these changes
Sep 28, 2018
alanshaw
deleted the
fix/revert-libp2p-records-for-ipns-should-be-signed
branch
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The js-ipfs#1543 broke the interop tests for
IPNSon interop#26.The js-ipfs#1543 was added after my analysis for the implementation of
IPNS over Pubsub, as I wanted to have exactly the same behavior and interface as the DHT, in order to have an easy to plug DHT afterward. Accordingly:DHT PUT:
js-libp2p-kad-dht/index.js#L166
js-libp2p-kad-dht/utils.js#L150
So, I wanted to make this logic available to Pubsub / local and it is all good in JS land. However,
go-ipfsdoes not do that:go-ipfs/namesys/publisher.go#L278
go-libp2p-kad-dht/dht.go#L149
And this causes and interop problem!
At first, different protobuf definitions:
go-libp2p-record/record.proto
js-libp2p-record/record.proto.js
So, when we publish using a GO node, followed by a JS node resolve, the
resolvewill try to validate the record, but it will break js-libp2p-record/record.js#L42There is no author, and trying to get ID is 💥 Other than that, the interop is fine. I believe that, as the
IPNSrecord is signed inside thelibp2p-record, it is not bad to have it not signed. It would be better to have it signed, but we can handle this together withDHT Interop.Other note: This can be one of many problems regarding DHT interop, and I will look deeper on that later.