You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 13, 2023. It is now read-only.
Since 2**23 doesn't completely cover 10 million nodes, I went for 2**20 which
covers 1 million nodes (as suggested by @RichardLitt).
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vilata-i-Balaguer <ivan@selidor.net>
Since 2**23 doesn't completely cover 10 million nodes, I went for 2**20 which
covers 1 million nodes (as suggested by @RichardLitt).
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vilata-i-Balaguer <ivan@selidor.net>
ivilata
added a commit
to ivilata/papers
that referenced
this issue
Dec 2, 2015
Since 2**23 doesn't completely cover 10 million nodes, I went for 2**20 which
covers 1 million nodes (as suggested by @RichardLitt).
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vilata-i-Balaguer <ivan@selidor.net>
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
https://github.com/ipfs/papers/blob/master/ipfs-cap2pfs/ipfs-cap2pfs.tex#L57-L59
That's 20 hops for 1,000,000 nodes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: