Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Descope Go-IPFS 2019 roadmap for Package Managers priority #28

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2019

Conversation

momack2
Copy link
Contributor

@momack2 momack2 commented Apr 5, 2019

This is just a first pass at reformatting our 2019 roadmap to narrow in on package manager support. I think there are more of these that we should proactively drop - and more that we know now that we should add. @Stebalien @eingenito @ipfs/go-team for thoughts and improvements!

This is just a first pass at reformatting our 2019 roadmap to narrow in on package manager support. I think there are more of these that we should proactively drop - and more that we know now that we should add. @Stebalien @eingenito @ipfs/go-team for thoughts and improvements!
@momack2 momack2 requested review from eingenito and Stebalien April 5, 2019 22:29
@ghost ghost assigned momack2 Apr 5, 2019
@ghost ghost added the status/in-progress In progress label Apr 5, 2019
@Mikaela
Copy link

Mikaela commented Apr 6, 2019

This is probably a wrong place to ask, but does this mean that there is a goal to have apt-transport-ipfs this year?

@andrew
Copy link
Contributor

andrew commented Apr 6, 2019

@Mikaela there's already a transport plugin available: https://github.com/JaquerEspeis/apt-transport-ipfs, I've been working on getting a mirror up: ipfs-inactive/package-managers#18 https://github.com/ipfs-shipyard/apt-on-ipfs/

@momack2 momack2 merged commit 035fe24 into master Jun 16, 2019
@momack2 momack2 deleted the momack2-patch-1 branch June 16, 2019 10:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants