Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 8, 2023. It is now read-only.

Added sync.md, edited sprint description #37

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 5, 2015
Merged

Conversation

RichardLitt
Copy link
Member

I've added sync.md to help standardize where we get the Sprint template from. I've also added some text to the PM Readme to clarify the job of the sprint master, and how to update on your sprint.

I've added EST, because a few of us are eastern time and looking for PDT is confusing.

I'm not sure what lines 75-86 are doing. The sprint checkin seems the same as the Sprint cap.

@jbenet jbenet added the status/in-progress In progress label Oct 5, 2015

Each participant gives an update on their assignment, what got done, what didn't, and discusses successes and failures. Participant, sprint master, and whoever is interested should discuss ways of improving task definition, allocation, and implementation to increase future successes and avoid failures.

If you are a partipicant, the normal way of showing assignments is to copy and paste your list from the previous sprint, with [x], [ ], and [~] indicating items done, undone, or in progress, respectively. Be sure to copy and paste in small chunks, or IRC may ban you for flooding the channel. Lines of 5 seems to work well.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 maybe s/ban/kick, as ban is a more serious thing. freenode will kick.

@jbenet
Copy link
Member

jbenet commented Oct 5, 2015

great! LGTM.

jbenet added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2015
Added sync.md, edited sprint description
@jbenet jbenet merged commit da96cf5 into master Oct 5, 2015
@jbenet jbenet removed the status/in-progress In progress label Oct 5, 2015
@jbenet jbenet deleted the feature/edit-sprint branch October 5, 2015 19:36
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants