Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 11, 2021. It is now read-only.

2018 Q4 OKR Planning #148

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2018
Merged

2018 Q4 OKR Planning #148

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2018

Conversation

daviddias
Copy link
Member

Ref: ipfs/team-mgmt#698

@vmx et al, you know the drill :)


We try to frame our ongoing work using a process based on quarterly Objectives and Key Results (OKRs). Objectives reflect outcomes that are challenging, but realistic. Results are tangible and measurable.

## 2018 Q4
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It will be in the same spreadsheet, so this file should just link to it, so it won't need to be updated. @diasdavid Do you do the change, or should I do a commit on-top?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vmx that's the intention, actually. Check the flow that happens on js-ipfs land.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In js-ipld land there is not really a flow as it's a one man show. I just put my OKRs into the spreadsheet and that's it.

But it's OK for me to update this file accordingly in two weeks.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In js-ipld land there is not really a flow as it's a one man show.

Not the case :) You have me, @Stebalien, @davidad, @mikeal (who has been spending time doing IPLD things), @zcstarr (who has contributed in the past and can participate in the discussion) and then you have users such as @b5, @pgte, @satazor and others that can give you valuable feedback on the plan for the quarter.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Happy to participate in the discussion, been a little away from the project for a short spell, got wrapped up in finishing up some work stuff, but looking forward to having time again to jump back in again soon and help out.

@vmx
Copy link
Member

vmx commented Sep 21, 2018

I've updated the spreadsheet linked above with the things I have in mind for Q4. If you'ev any comments or requests, feel free to post them here or just add items there and assign them to yourself.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 27, 2018

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@cb60257). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #148   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   82.47%           
=========================================
  Files             ?        1           
  Lines             ?      194           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?      160           
  Misses            ?       34           
  Partials          ?        0

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cb60257...b0815ea. Read the comment docs.

@daviddias
Copy link
Member Author

@mikeal @Stebalien @momack2 can you review @vmx OKRs?

@vmx I guess you didn't get a chance to present them yet, correct? //cc @steverichmond

@vmx
Copy link
Member

vmx commented Sep 27, 2018

@diasdavid we (@jbenet, @momack2, @Stebalien, @mikeal) reviewed the OKRs yesterday night. They should be all set for the overall OKR meeting later tonight.

@daviddias daviddias merged commit 9e3ab9e into master Oct 26, 2018
@daviddias daviddias deleted the 2018-Q4-OKRs branch October 26, 2018 15:02
@vmx
Copy link
Member

vmx commented Oct 26, 2018

@diasdavid The updated one should've been used, see #170.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants