Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use integer counter instead of loop.time() to preserve message ordering #362

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 9, 2018

Conversation

minrk
Copy link
Member

@minrk minrk commented Oct 8, 2018

  • avoids need to truncate comparison because it will always be unique
  • avoids message reordering issues with low-resolution timers on Windows

closes #356
closes jupyter/notebook#4052
closes ipython/ipython#11348

- avoids need to truncate comparison because it will always be unique
- avoids sorting issues with low-resolution timers on Windows
@minrk minrk added this to the 5.1 milestone Oct 8, 2018
@jasongrout
Copy link
Member

Thanks @minrk!

and increase default from 50 to 100 milliseconds
due to reports of messages not being cancelled
@minrk minrk merged commit 118b684 into ipython:master Oct 9, 2018
@minrk minrk deleted the message-order branch October 9, 2018 12:29
@PCJimmmy
Copy link

I assume 5.1.0 will be available soon. The current error all over my scripts - I have to step run thru each very slowly to avoid cells being skipped or the run order wrong.

@jasongrout
Copy link
Member

5.1.0 was released over a week ago: https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/ipykernel/files for conda, https://pypi.org/project/ipykernel/#history for pypi.

@esvhd
Copy link

esvhd commented Oct 18, 2018 via email

@PCJimmmy
Copy link

PCJimmmy commented Oct 18, 2018 via email

@PCJimmmy
Copy link

PCJimmmy commented Oct 18, 2018 via email

@ArthurKhalil
Copy link

"use integer counter instead of loop.time() to preserve message ordering"

What does that even mean? How do i do that? What command do i input in jupyter to do that?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
5 participants