bump up mods.irisnet.org/modules/coinswap to cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 #461
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces substantial updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
modules/coinswap/keeper/fees.go (1)
Line range hint
16-24: Consider adding error handling for tax calculation overflow.The tax calculation involves multiplication and truncation operations which could potentially overflow. Consider adding checks to ensure the calculations don't exceed maximum values.
// compute community tax and burned coin +// Ensure tax calculation doesn't overflow +taxRate := params.TaxRate +if taxRate.GT(math.LegacyOneDec()) { + return types.ErrInvalidTaxRate.Wrap("tax rate cannot be greater than 100%") +} communityTaxCoin := sdk.NewCoin(poolCreationFee.Denom, - math.LegacyNewDecFromInt(poolCreationFee.Amount).Mul(params.TaxRate).TruncateInt()) + math.LegacyNewDecFromInt(poolCreationFee.Amount). + Mul(taxRate). + TruncateInt())proto/irismod/coinswap/coinswap.proto (1)
44-45: Consider documenting the breaking changesThe switch to
math.LegacyDecrepresents a breaking change that might affect clients parsing these protobuf messages.Consider:
- Adding a comment in the proto file documenting this change
- Updating the module's upgrade guide or migration documentation
- Ensuring all client implementations are notified of this breaking change
Would you like me to help draft the documentation for these changes?
Also applies to: 52-53, 57-58
modules/coinswap/types/params.go (2)
96-96: Fix typo in function nameThe function name has inconsistent casing and a typo:
validateUnilateraLiquiditylFeeshould bevalidateUnilateralLiquidityFee.-func validateUnilateraLiquiditylFee(i interface{}) error { +func validateUnilateralLiquidityFee(i interface{}) error {
49-51: Fix incorrect error message in TaxRate validationThe error message refers to "fee" instead of "tax rate" which could be confusing.
if !p.TaxRate.GT(math.LegacyZeroDec()) || !p.TaxRate.LT(math.LegacyOneDec()) { - return fmt.Errorf("fee must be positive and less than 1: %s", p.TaxRate.String()) + return fmt.Errorf("tax rate must be positive and less than 1: %s", p.TaxRate.String()) }modules/coinswap/migrations/v2/migrate.go (2)
Line range hint
42-54: Critical: Improve error handling during account iterationThe account iteration block has a potential issue where errors are handled by panicking, which could leave the system in an inconsistent state during migration.
Consider implementing a more graceful error handling approach:
ak.IterateAccounts(ctx, func(account sdk.AccountI) (stop bool) { balances := bk.GetAllBalances(ctx, account.GetAddress()) for _, ltpDenom := range lptDenoms { amount := balances.AmountOf(ltpDenom) if amount.IsZero() { continue } originLptCoin := sdk.NewCoin(ltpDenom, amount) - err := migrateProvider(ctx, originLptCoin, bk, pools[ltpDenom], account.GetAddress()) - if err != nil { - panic(err) - } + if err := migrateProvider(ctx, originLptCoin, bk, pools[ltpDenom], account.GetAddress()); err != nil { + ctx.Logger().Error("failed to migrate provider", + "address", account.GetAddress(), + "error", err) + return true // stop iteration on error + } } return false })
Add safety measures to prevent data loss during migration
The verification reveals several concerns in the migration implementation:
- The migration code uses
panic()for error handling which can leave the chain in an inconsistent state- No logging statements exist in the migration code for audit trail
- No pre-migration state validation or atomic transaction wrapper
Recommendations:
- Replace
panic(err)with proper error returns to allow graceful handling- Add logging statements using
ctx.Logger()to track migration progress- Implement state validation before migration starts
- Consider wrapping the migration in a transaction for atomicity
Key locations needing changes:
modules/coinswap/migrations/v2/migrate.go:52- Replace panic with error returnmodules/coinswap/migrations/v2/migrate.go- Add logging statements for each major stepmodules/coinswap/migrations/v2/migrate.go- Add pre-migration validation of pool states🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-116: Verify migration safety measuresThe migration involves critical operations like burning and minting tokens. Consider implementing additional safety measures.
Recommendations:
- Add pre-migration state validation
- Implement atomic migration with rollback capability
- Add detailed logging for audit trail
Run this verification script to check for potential issues:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for proper error handling and recovery mechanisms in migration code # Look for direct panics echo "Checking for panic calls..." rg -n 'panic\(' modules/coinswap/ # Check for proper error handling patterns echo "Checking error handling patterns..." ast-grep --pattern 'if err := $$$; err != nil { panic($$$) }' # Look for logging statements echo "Checking logging coverage..." rg -n 'Logger\(\)' modules/coinswap/Length of output: 10098
modules/coinswap/keeper/depinject_test.go (1)
Line range hint
60-64: Remove outdated capability module commentThe module initialization order looks correct, but there's an outdated comment above the
genesisModuleOrderthat references the capability module, which has been removed.- // NOTE: Capability module must occur first so that it can initialize any capabilities - // so that other modules that want to create or claim capabilities afterwards in InitChain - // can do so safely.modules/coinswap/keeper/swap.go (1)
111-145: Consider transaction atomicity in double swapsThe
doubleTradeExactInputForOutputanddoubleTradeInputForExactOutputfunctions perform two separate swap operations. While each swap is validated individually, there's a potential edge case where market conditions could change between the two swaps, potentially leading to unexpected outcomes.Consider implementing these recommendations:
- Add a maximum slippage check across both swaps
- Document the atomicity guarantees provided by the Cosmos SDK transaction mechanism
- Consider adding a warning in the function documentation about potential price impact in double swaps
Also applies to: 229-265
modules/coinswap/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
160-160: Verify the constant deduction value across test casesThe same value of 5000 is being consistently subtracted across multiple test cases. Please verify if this magic number represents a specific fee or constant that should be defined as a named constant for better maintainability and clarity.
Consider extracting this magic number into a named constant:
const ( denomBTC = "btc" denomETH = "eth" + defaultDeduction = uint64(5000) // Add a descriptive comment explaining what this value represents )Then update the usage:
-sdkmath.NewIntWithDecimal(2, 19).Sub(sdkmath.NewIntFromUint64(5000)) +sdkmath.NewIntWithDecimal(2, 19).Sub(sdkmath.NewIntFromUint64(defaultDeduction))Also applies to: 233-233, 317-317, 410-410
modules/coinswap/keeper/swap_test.go (1)
333-333: LGTM! Consider extracting test constantsThe helper functions and test methods have been correctly updated to use
sdkmath.NewInt. To improve test maintainability, consider extracting commonly used test values into constants.+const ( + testMinReward = 1 + testStandardAmount = 100 + testBTCAmount = 100 +) + func createReservePool(suite *TestSuite, denom string) (sdk.AccAddress, sdk.AccAddress) { // ... - minReward := sdkmath.NewInt(1) + minReward := sdkmath.NewInt(testMinReward) // ... }Also applies to: 367-368, 408-409
modules/coinswap/keeper/keeper.go (1)
Line range hint
599-603: Consider improving formula documentationThe complex mathematical formula for calculating withdrawn amounts would benefit from additional documentation explaining each step of the calculation and its purpose.
Consider adding detailed comments:
+ // Calculate withdrawn amount using the formula: + // targetTokenNumerator = (2 * lptBalance - exactLiquidity) * exactLiquidity * targetBalance * feeNumerator + // targetTokenDenominator = lptBalance^2 * feeDenominator + // This ensures proportional withdrawal while accounting for fees targetTokenNumerator := lptBalanceAmt.Add(lptBalanceAmt).Sub(msg.ExactLiquidity). Mul(msg.ExactLiquidity).Mul(targetBalanceAmt).Mul(feeNumerator) targetTokenDenominator := lptBalanceAmt.Mul(lptBalanceAmt).Mul(feeDenominator)api/irismod/coinswap/tx.pulsar.go (3)
Line range hint
1-100: Consider adding validation for amount fields and deadline.While the message structures are well-defined, consider adding the following validations in the message handling logic:
- Ensure amount fields (exact_standard_amt, min_liquidity) are non-negative
- Verify that deadline is a future timestamp
- Validate that max_token amount is greater than zero
These validations should be implemented in the message handler, not in this generated file.
7121-7133: Document the is_buy_order flag behavior and add validation.The
is_buy_orderflag in MsgSwapOrder could lead to confusion. Consider:
- Adding clear documentation about how this flag affects swap execution
- Implementing validation to ensure input and output tokens are not the same
- Adding checks for non-zero amounts in the handler
Add detailed comments explaining the swap execution behavior based on the is_buy_order flag.
7135-7146: Ensure proper access control for parameter updates.The parameter update message follows Cosmos SDK standards, but ensure:
- The authority is properly restricted to governance or designated admin
- Parameter validation is comprehensive
- Changes are properly logged for auditing
Consider implementing a time-delay mechanism for parameter updates to allow for community review and potential emergency responses.
api/irismod/coinswap/coinswap.pulsar.go (1)
Line range hint
2-4: Note on auto-generated codeThis file is generated by
protoc-gen-go-pulsarand should not be manually edited. To make changes to the message definitions or their implementations, please modify the corresponding.protofiles and regenerate the code.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
modules/coinswap/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.summodules/coinswap/types/coinswap.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gomodules/coinswap/types/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (23)
api/irismod/coinswap/coinswap.pulsar.go(1 hunks)api/irismod/coinswap/tx.pulsar.go(1 hunks)modules/coinswap/depinject.go(2 hunks)modules/coinswap/go.mod(1 hunks)modules/coinswap/keeper/depinject_test.go(2 hunks)modules/coinswap/keeper/fees.go(2 hunks)modules/coinswap/keeper/grpc_query.go(1 hunks)modules/coinswap/keeper/keeper.go(3 hunks)modules/coinswap/keeper/keeper_test.go(5 hunks)modules/coinswap/keeper/pool.go(2 hunks)modules/coinswap/keeper/swap.go(6 hunks)modules/coinswap/keeper/swap_test.go(10 hunks)modules/coinswap/migrations/v2/migrate.go(1 hunks)modules/coinswap/migrations/v3/migrate.go(2 hunks)modules/coinswap/migrations/v4/migrate.go(3 hunks)modules/coinswap/module.go(1 hunks)modules/coinswap/simulation/genesis.go(2 hunks)modules/coinswap/simulation/operations.go(9 hunks)modules/coinswap/types/expected_keepers.go(2 hunks)modules/coinswap/types/msgs_test.go(25 hunks)modules/coinswap/types/params.go(4 hunks)proto/irismod/coinswap/coinswap.proto(1 hunks)proto/irismod/coinswap/tx.proto(4 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- modules/coinswap/keeper/grpc_query.go
🔇 Additional comments (47)
modules/coinswap/keeper/fees.go (2)
4-4: LGTM! Import change aligns with SDK v0.50.x guidelines.
The addition of cosmossdk.io/math import follows the recommended migration path for Cosmos SDK v0.50.x.
17-17: Verify if LegacyNewDecFromInt is the recommended approach.
While the change from sdk.NewDecFromInt to math.LegacyNewDecFromInt works, the "Legacy" prefix suggests this might be a transitional solution. Let's verify if this is the recommended approach in SDK v0.50.10.
✅ Verification successful
Use LegacyNewDecFromInt as it's the correct approach in SDK v0.50.10
The usage of math.LegacyNewDecFromInt is correct and recommended in Cosmos SDK v0.50.10. The "Legacy" prefix doesn't indicate deprecation in this case, but rather denotes the stable, backwards-compatible implementation of decimal operations. This is evidenced by:
- The module is using Cosmos SDK v0.50.10, which standardizes on the
cosmossdk.io/mathpackage - The codebase consistently uses
LegacyNewDecFromIntacross different modules - There are no alternative non-legacy decimal implementations available in the SDK v0.50.10
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check SDK documentation and usage patterns for decimal conversion
# Search for NewDecFromInt usage patterns in the codebase
rg --type go "NewDecFromInt|LegacyNewDecFromInt" -A 2 -B 2
# Check go.mod for exact cosmos-sdk version
grep -A 1 "cosmos-sdk" go.mod
# Look for migration guides in docs
fd -g "*.md" | xargs rg -l "decimal.*migration|math.*migration"
Length of output: 9947
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the go.mod file location and cosmos-sdk version
fd -t f "go.mod"
# Let's also check for any migration guides or documentation
fd -t f "UPGRADING.md|CHANGELOG.md|MIGRATION.md"
# Let's look for any other decimal-related imports and usage
rg --type go "\"cosmossdk.io/math\"" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 20021
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the specific module's go.mod for cosmos-sdk version
cat modules/coinswap/go.mod | grep -A 1 "cosmos-sdk"
# Let's also check if there are any specific math package imports or migrations
rg --type go "LegacyNewDecFromInt|NewDecFromInt" modules/coinswap/
Length of output: 590
modules/coinswap/migrations/v3/migrate.go (2)
14-14: LGTM: Type migration to cosmossdk.io/math package
The change from sdk.NewDecWithPrec to sdkmath.LegacyNewDecWithPrec is correct and consistent with the module's upgrade to cosmos-sdk v0.50.10.
Line range hint 28-35: Verify parameter migration preserves existing values
The migration correctly preserves the Fee parameter while setting new defaults for PoolCreationFee and TaxRate. However, please verify if any existing PoolCreationFee or TaxRate values should be preserved during migration.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the search results to verify the parameter migration:
- From
modules/coinswap/migrations/v3/migrate.go, I can see the default values being set:
DefaultPoolCreationFee = sdk.NewCoin("uiris", sdkmath.NewIntWithDecimal(5000, 6))
DefaultTaxRate = sdkmath.LegacyNewDecWithPrec(4, 1)- Looking at the migration code in the review:
func Migrate(ctx sdk.Context, k CoinswapKeeper, paramSpace types.Subspace) error {
params := GetLegacyParams(ctx, paramSpace)
newParams := types.Params{
Fee: params.Fee,
PoolCreationFee: DefaultPoolCreationFee,
TaxRate: DefaultTaxRate,
}
return k.SetParams(ctx, newParams)Let me verify how the legacy params are fetched:
Let me try a different approach to find the GetLegacyParams implementation:
Let me check the legacy Params struct definition to understand what parameters were stored previously:
Let me try a broader search to understand the parameter migration:
Based on the evidence found, I can now provide the final response:
Migration correctly handles parameter initialization
The migration is correctly implemented. The legacy parameters only contained the Fee parameter, while PoolCreationFee and TaxRate are new parameters being introduced in v3. The migration appropriately:
- Preserves the existing
Feeparameter value from the old state - Initializes the new parameters with well-defined defaults:
PoolCreationFee: 5000000 uiris (5000 * 10^6)TaxRate: 0.4 (40%)
There are no existing values to preserve for PoolCreationFee and TaxRate since they are newly introduced parameters.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any other files in the codebase that might store or reference these parameters
rg -A 2 "PoolCreationFee|TaxRate" --type go
Length of output: 50922
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check GetLegacyParams implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'func GetLegacyParams($_, $_) $$ {
$$$
}' modules/coinswap/migrations/v3/migrate.go
Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for GetLegacyParams implementation with ripgrep
rg -A 10 "func GetLegacyParams" modules/coinswap/migrations/v3/
Length of output: 874
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the legacy Params struct definition
rg -B 2 -A 5 "type Params struct" modules/coinswap/migrations/v3/migrate.go
Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any struct definitions and parameter handling in the migration file
rg -A 10 "type|param|Param" modules/coinswap/migrations/v3/migrate.go
Length of output: 1383
modules/coinswap/migrations/v4/migrate.go (2)
4-4: LGTM: Import change aligns with SDK upgrade
The addition of cosmossdk.io/math import is appropriate for the transition to math.LegacyDec types and aligns with the cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 upgrade objective.
24-26: LGTM: Field type updates align with SDK changes
The transition from sdk.Dec to math.LegacyDec for Fee and TaxRate fields is appropriate, while correctly maintaining sdk.Coin for PoolCreationFee. The protobuf annotations are properly updated to reflect the new types.
Let's verify the consistency of these changes across the module:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Field type updates are consistent throughout the module
The verification confirms that the coinswap module has been properly updated to use math.LegacyDec consistently. All relevant code paths show:
- Proper usage of
math.LegacyDecin protobuf definitions - Consistent type usage in the codebase, including migrations, params, and tests
- Correct maintenance of
sdk.Coinfor coin-related fields
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining sdk.Dec usages that might need updating
rg "sdk\.Dec" --type go
# Verify protobuf customtype consistency
rg "customtype=cosmossdk\.io/math\.LegacyDec" --type proto
Length of output: 1932
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for proto files with a different extension pattern and verify LegacyDec usage
fd -e proto -x rg "customtype.*LegacyDec" {}
# Check the specific module's proto files
fd -g "modules/coinswap/**/*.proto" -x cat {}
# Let's also check for any remaining Dec usages in the coinswap module
rg "Dec" modules/coinswap/
Length of output: 10444
modules/coinswap/types/expected_keepers.go (4)
4-5: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate
The addition of the "context" import is necessary to support the transition from sdk.Context to context.Context.
63-64: LGTM: Subspace interface update is consistent
The update to use context.Context in the Subspace interface's GetParamSet method is consistent with the module-wide context type changes.
43-45: Verify the impact of AccountI type change
The change from authtypes.AccountI to sdk.AccountI in the GetAccount return type and IterateAccounts callback looks correct, but we should verify that all type assertions and implementations handle this change properly.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient information. The results show that:
- There are no remaining usages of
authtypes.AccountIin the codebase - The only usages of
AccountIare in the interface definition and one implementation in migrations that correctly usessdk.AccountI - The implementation in migrations properly handles the
sdk.AccountItype by only using the standard interface methodGetAddress()
Type change to sdk.AccountI verified successfully
The change from authtypes.AccountI to sdk.AccountI has been properly implemented across the codebase. All usages are consistent with the new type and only rely on the standard interface methods.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining authtypes.AccountI usage
# and verify that all implementations handle sdk.AccountI correctly
# Search for any remaining authtypes.AccountI usage
rg "authtypes\.AccountI" ./modules/coinswap/
# Search for type assertions or conversions involving AccountI
rg -A 3 "AccountI" ./modules/coinswap/
Length of output: 942
12-37: Verify context type changes across dependent packages
The transition from sdk.Context to context.Context in the BankKeeper interface looks correct. Let's verify that all implementations and callers have been updated accordingly.
modules/coinswap/simulation/genesis.go (4)
8-8: LGTM: Import change aligns with SDK upgrade
The addition of cosmossdk.io/math import is consistent with the migration to cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 and follows the unified namespace pattern.
33-57: LGTM: Random generation logic properly updated
The random generation logic has been correctly updated to use LegacyNewDecWithPrec while maintaining the same precision and range values. The changes are consistent with the type migration.
Line range hint 61-77: LGTM: Parameter and genesis state construction unchanged
The parameter construction and genesis state creation logic remain stable while properly handling the updated types. The marshaling logic correctly handles the new LegacyDec types.
26-29: Verify consistent usage of LegacyDec across the module
The migration from sdk.Dec to math.LegacyDec for fee-related variables is a breaking change. Let's ensure all related code is updated consistently.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the usage context.
Migration to math.LegacyDec is consistently implemented
The verification shows that the migration from sdk.Dec to math.LegacyDec has been properly implemented across the coinswap module:
- All operational code uses
math.LegacyDecconsistently (only the spec documentation contains old references) - Parameters are correctly defined with
math.LegacyDecin types/params.go - Migration files (v3 and v4) properly handle the type changes
- All related validations and operations use compatible math.LegacyDec methods
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent usage of Dec types across the coinswap module
# Look for any remaining sdk.Dec usages that might need updating
echo "Checking for any remaining sdk.Dec usages in coinswap module..."
rg -l "sdk\.Dec" modules/coinswap/
echo "Checking for math.LegacyDec usage consistency..."
rg -l "math\.LegacyDec" modules/coinswap/
echo "Checking for potential type mismatches in method calls..."
ast-grep --pattern 'NewDecWithPrec($$$)' modules/coinswap/
Length of output: 807
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for specific Dec-related patterns in the coinswap module
echo "Checking for sdk.Dec method calls and assignments..."
rg -A 2 "sdk\.Dec" modules/coinswap/
echo "Checking for actual usage of the fee-related fields..."
rg -A 2 "(fee|taxRate|unilateralLiquidityFee)" modules/coinswap/types/params.go
echo "Checking migrations handling of these fields..."
rg -A 2 "(fee|taxRate|unilateralLiquidityFee)" modules/coinswap/migrations/v4/migrate.go
rg -A 2 "(fee|taxRate|unilateralLiquidityFee)" modules/coinswap/migrations/v3/migrate.go
Length of output: 2988
modules/coinswap/depinject.go (1)
6-6: LGTM! Import path update aligns with Cosmos SDK v0.50.x
The change from store to storetypes follows the correct import convention for cosmos-sdk v0.50.x.
modules/coinswap/types/params.go (4)
6-6: LGTM: Import changes align with SDK upgrade
The addition of cosmossdk.io/math import is appropriate for the transition to math.LegacyDec types.
Line range hint 12-19: LGTM: Constructor properly updated for SDK compatibility
The constructor signature has been correctly updated to use math.LegacyDec types while maintaining the same parameter structure.
Line range hint 6-103: Verify type transitions across dependent modules
The transition from sdk.Dec to math.LegacyDec looks complete in this file. However, we should verify that all dependent modules have been updated consistently.
✅ Verification successful
Type transitions are complete and consistent
The verification shows that:
- No instances of
sdk.Decremain in the Go code files - All decimal types have been properly transitioned to
math.LegacyDecorsdkmath.LegacyDecacross the module - The transitions are consistent in all relevant files including:
- Main params implementation
- Generated protobuf code
- Migration code
- Keeper implementation
- Test files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining sdk.Dec usages in the coinswap module
rg "sdk\.Dec|sdk\.NewDec" modules/coinswap/
# Search for any imports of this params package to ensure all dependents are updated
rg -l "coinswap/types.Params" modules/
Length of output: 262
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any remaining sdk.Dec usages in the actual code files (excluding docs)
rg "sdk\.Dec|sdk\.NewDec" modules/coinswap/ --type go
# Search for math.LegacyDec to confirm the transitions
rg "math\.LegacyDec" modules/coinswap/ --type go
# Search for imports and usages of the params type more broadly
rg "\"github\.com/.*?/modules/coinswap/types\"" --type go
Length of output: 2234
28-28: Verify the high default tax rate of 40%
The default tax rate is set to 40% which seems unusually high for a liquidity pool. Please confirm if this is the intended default value.
✅ Verification successful
The 40% tax rate is consistently defined across modules and validated
The tax rate of 40% (0.4) is intentionally set as the default value in both the token and coinswap modules. This is confirmed by:
- It's documented in both modules' specs (modules/token/spec/04_params.md and modules/coinswap/spec/04_params.md)
- Both modules have validation logic ensuring the tax rate must be between 0 and 1
- The rate is consistently defined in multiple files:
- modules/token/types/v1/params.go
- modules/token/types/v1beta1/params.go
- modules/coinswap/types/params.go
While this rate may seem high, it appears to be an intentional design choice that has been properly documented and validated across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any documentation or tests that justify this tax rate
rg -i "tax.*rate.*0.4|40%.*tax" --type md
rg -i "NewDecWithPrec.*4.*1.*tax" --type go
Length of output: 279
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the spec files that mention this tax rate to understand the context better
cat modules/token/spec/04_params.md modules/coinswap/spec/04_params.md
# Also check for any test files that might validate this rate
rg -l "TaxRate.*0.4|0.4.*TaxRate" --type go
Length of output: 1067
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the test files and implementation to understand if this rate is actually used in practice
cat modules/token/types/v1/params.go modules/token/types/v1beta1/params.go modules/coinswap/types/params.go
# Also check for any tests that might show how this rate is used
rg -A 5 "TaxRate.*0.4|0.4.*TaxRate" --type go
Length of output: 9970
modules/coinswap/migrations/v2/migrate.go (1)
42-42: LGTM: Account type update aligns with SDK v0.50.x standards
The change from authtypes.AccountI to sdk.AccountI is correct and follows the Cosmos SDK v0.50.x conventions.
modules/coinswap/keeper/pool.go (2)
7-7: LGTM: Import path update aligns with SDK upgrade.
The import path change to use storetypes from cosmossdk.io/store/types is consistent with the PR objective of upgrading to cosmos-sdk v0.50.10.
46-46: LGTM: Iterator type update matches SDK changes.
The change from sdk.KVStorePrefixIterator to storetypes.KVStorePrefixIterator correctly reflects the SDK's type reorganization while maintaining the same functionality.
proto/irismod/coinswap/tx.proto (3)
50-56: LGTM: Type updates align with cosmos-sdk v0.50.10
The change to use cosmossdk.io/math.Int is correct and consistent with the cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 standards.
73-76: LGTM: Consistent type update for min_liquidity
The type change maintains consistency with other message definitions in the module.
92-98: LGTM: Appropriate type updates for minimum amount fields
The type changes for minimum amount fields are correct and maintain consistency across the module.
modules/coinswap/keeper/depinject_test.go (2)
27-29: LGTM: Import changes align with cosmos-sdk v0.50.10
The addition of evidence, feegrant, and upgrade type imports, along with the removal of capability module imports, correctly aligns with the module structure in cosmos-sdk v0.50.10.
Line range hint 95-119: Verify module execution order dependencies
The BeginBlockers and EndBlockers ordering looks correct, with proper consideration for module dependencies (e.g., slashing after distribution for fee pool management). However, let's verify there are no new ordering requirements introduced in cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 for the newly added modules.
Also applies to: 120-144
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the module dependencies, particularly focusing on the newly added modules and their ordering requirements.
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the module ordering requirements.
Module execution order is correctly maintained
The current BeginBlockers ordering follows the required dependencies:
- Slashing is correctly placed after distribution module for fee pool management
- All modules that depend on capabilities are properly ordered
- The consensus module is appropriately placed at the end of BeginBlockers
- Evidence, feegrant, and upgrade modules are positioned without any ordering conflicts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any ordering requirements in the SDK docs or code
rg -A 3 -B 3 "BeginBlock|EndBlock" | rg -C 3 "evidence|feegrant|upgrade"
Length of output: 5344
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any ordering requirements in module initialization or documentation
rg -A 3 -B 3 "order.*depend|must.*before|after" | grep -i "begin\|end\|block"
# Check if there are any specific requirements in consensus module
rg -A 3 -B 3 "BeginBlock|EndBlock" | rg -C 3 "consensus"
# Look for any evidence module requirements
rg -A 3 -B 3 "BeginBlock|EndBlock" | rg -C 3 "evidence.*before|evidence.*after"
Length of output: 9886
modules/coinswap/keeper/swap.go (2)
41-41: LGTM: Error handling updates align with Cosmos SDK v0.50.x
The migration from sdk.ZeroInt() to sdkmath.ZeroInt() is correctly implemented across all error handling paths. Error messages remain descriptive and maintain proper context.
Also applies to: 47-47, 54-54, 57-57, 77-77, 82-82, 88-88, 92-92, 96-96, 114-114, 120-120, 124-124, 128-128, 133-133, 139-139, 143-143, 158-158, 164-164, 171-171, 174-174, 177-177, 197-197, 202-202, 208-208, 212-212, 216-216, 234-234, 240-240, 247-247, 252-252, 256-256, 260-260, 263-263
271-275: Verify precision handling in pricing calculations
The migration to sdkmath.LegacyDec and sdkmath.LegacyPrecision looks correct, but we should verify that precision handling remains consistent with previous behavior to avoid any potential precision loss in AMM calculations.
Also applies to: 281-285
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now verify the precision handling in the pricing calculations. Let me analyze the key findings:
-
The test cases in
modules/coinswap/keeper/swap_test.godemonstrate that the precision handling is thoroughly tested with various scenarios including:- Different input amounts (100, 200, 300, 1000)
- Different fee rates (0.003 and 0)
- Consistent reserve amounts (1000)
-
The implementation in
GetInputPriceandGetOutputPricefunctions properly handles precision by:- Using
sdkmath.LegacyPrecisionfor denominator scaling - Properly handling fee calculations with
LegacyDec - Maintaining precision through multiplication before division
- Using
-
The test cases verify both input and output price calculations with expected results that match the AMM formula.
Precision handling in pricing calculations verified
The migration to sdkmath.LegacyDec and sdkmath.LegacyPrecision maintains consistent precision handling with comprehensive test coverage. The implementation correctly scales values and handles decimal arithmetic for AMM calculations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any precision-related test cases or documentation
# Look for test cases involving precision checks
rg -A 5 "TestGetInputPrice|TestGetOutputPrice" --type go
# Look for precision-related constants or documentation
rg -A 3 "Precision|Dec.*" --type go
Length of output: 102565
modules/coinswap/types/msgs_test.go (3)
Line range hint 1-9: LGTM! Import changes align with cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 upgrade
The addition of sdkmath "cosmossdk.io/math" import and its usage throughout the file is consistent with the upgrade to cosmos-sdk v0.50.10.
508-512: LGTM! Helper function properly updated
The buildCoin helper function has been correctly updated to use sdkmath.NewInt(), maintaining consistency with the cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 upgrade.
Line range hint 129-481: Verify test coverage after type changes
The migration from sdk.NewInt() to sdkmath.NewInt() is consistently applied across all test cases. However, let's verify the test coverage to ensure all edge cases are still properly tested.
✅ Verification successful
Test coverage is comprehensive and properly maintained
The test coverage analysis shows that:
- All message types (
MsgSwapOrder,MsgAddLiquidity,MsgRemoveLiquidity,MsgAddUnilateralLiquidity,MsgRemoveUnilateralLiquidity) have corresponding test functions - Each test function includes cases for all validation scenarios including:
- Invalid amounts (negative values)
- Invalid denominations
- Invalid deadlines
- Invalid addresses
- Empty/invalid fields
- The migration from
sdk.NewInt()tosdkmath.NewInt()is consistently applied across all test cases
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check test coverage for the coinswap module
# Run tests with coverage for the coinswap module
go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./modules/coinswap/...
# Display coverage report
go tool cover -func=coverage.out | grep -E "msgs.*\.go.*"
Length of output: 305
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the test coverage by analyzing the test cases directly
# First, check for any test functions in msgs_test.go
rg -A 2 "^func Test.*\(t \*testing\.T\)" modules/coinswap/types/msgs_test.go
# Then, check for ValidateBasic implementations to ensure all are tested
ast-grep --pattern 'func (msg $_) ValidateBasic() error { $$$ }' modules/coinswap/types/msgs.go
Length of output: 4193
modules/coinswap/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
43-43: LGTM: Context creation simplified
The context creation has been simplified by removing the unnecessary tmproto.Header{} parameter, which aligns with best practices for test setup.
modules/coinswap/keeper/swap_test.go (3)
34-47: LGTM! Test data initialization properly updated
The test data initialization has been correctly updated to use sdkmath.NewInt and sdkmath.LegacyDec types while maintaining the same test values and expectations.
Also applies to: 58-68
82-83: LGTM! Message construction properly updated
All NewMsgSwapOrder constructions have been correctly updated to use sdkmath.NewInt while maintaining the same test scenarios and values.
Also applies to: 134-135, 184-185, 255-256
25-25: Verify consistent usage of LegacyDec across the codebase
The change from sdk.Dec to sdkmath.LegacyDec is part of the cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 upgrade. Let's ensure this change is consistently applied across all related files.
✅ Verification successful
All decimal type migrations are consistent in the coinswap module
The change from sdk.Dec to sdkmath.LegacyDec in modules/coinswap/keeper/swap_test.go is consistent with the rest of the coinswap module. The search results show that:
- All decimal types in the coinswap module use
sdkmath.LegacyDecormath.LegacyDec(same package) - The fee parameter is consistently using
LegacyDecacross:- Test files (
keeper/swap_test.go) - Core logic (
keeper/swap.go) - Type definitions (
types/coinswap.pb.go) - Migration files (
migrations/v3/migrate.go,migrations/v4/migrate.go)
- Test files (
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining sdk.Dec usages that should be migrated to sdkmath.LegacyDec
# Search for any remaining sdk.Dec usages
echo "Checking for remaining sdk.Dec usages..."
rg --type go 'sdk\.Dec'
# Search for mixed usage of Dec types
echo "Checking for LegacyDec usages..."
rg --type go 'LegacyDec'
Length of output: 8777
modules/coinswap/keeper/keeper.go (4)
9-11: LGTM: Import paths updated correctly
The import paths have been updated to use the cosmossdk.io namespace, which aligns with the migration to cosmos-sdk v0.50.10.
316-318: LGTM: Fee calculation updated correctly
The unilateral liquidity fee calculation has been properly updated to use sdkmath.LegacyOneDec() and sdkmath.LegacyPrecision.
595-597: LGTM: Fee calculation updated correctly
The unilateral liquidity fee calculation has been properly updated to use sdkmath.LegacyOneDec() and sdkmath.LegacyPrecision.
326-329: Consider adding validation for square root calculation
The square root calculation using big.Int should include validation to handle negative or zero values gracefully.
Consider adding validation:
+ if square.IsNegative() || square.IsZero() {
+ return sdk.Coin{}, errorsmod.Wrapf(
+ types.ErrConstraintNotMet,
+ "invalid square value for liquidity calculation: %s",
+ square.String(),
+ )
+ }
squareBigInt := &big.Int{}
squareBigInt.Sqrt(square.BigInt())modules/coinswap/simulation/operations.go (3)
51-81: LGTM: Parameter generation simplification
The removal of the cdc parameter from GetOrGenerate calls is a clean simplification that doesn't affect functionality.
Line range hint 1004-1017: LGTM: Improved error handling for negative amounts
The addition of a negative amount check enhances the robustness of the swap operation by preventing invalid states and providing clear error messages.
251-251: LGTM: Cleaned up operation message creation
The removal of unused empty string parameters from NewOperationMsg calls improves code cleanliness without affecting functionality.
Also applies to: 463-463, 621-621, 769-769, 935-935
api/irismod/coinswap/tx.pulsar.go (1)
7146-7197: Generated protobuf code follows best practices.
The generated helper methods include:
- Proper error handling for unknown fields
- Complete size calculation and marshaling logic
- Standard protobuf reflection capabilities
The generated code follows protobuf best practices and includes necessary safety checks.
modules/coinswap/go.mod (2)
3-5: Ensure compatibility with Go 1.21 and toolchain go1.23.1
The Go version has been updated to 1.21, and the toolchain to go1.23.1. Please verify that the codebase is compatible with these versions and that all tests pass successfully.
8-30: Dependencies updated to support cosmos-sdk v0.50.10
The dependencies have been updated to versions compatible with cosmos-sdk v0.50.10, aligning with the PR objectives. This ensures that the coinswap module remains up-to-date with the latest features and improvements.
api/irismod/coinswap/coinswap.pulsar.go (1)
2601-2625: Verify the data types of 'tax_rate' and 'unilateral_liquidity_fee' in 'Params' message
Currently, the tax_rate and unilateral_liquidity_fee fields in the Params message are defined as string types. Considering the update to use cosmossdk.io/math.LegacyDec for decimal values, please ensure that these fields are correctly typed to match the new definitions and maintain consistency across the codebase.
Run the following script to verify the field types in the .proto files:
✅ Verification successful
Field types in Params message are correctly defined with LegacyDec
Looking at the proto definition in proto/irismod/coinswap/coinswap.proto, both fields are correctly typed:
string tax_rate = 3 [
(gogoproto.customtype) = "cosmossdk.io/math.LegacyDec",
(gogoproto.nullable) = false
];
string unilateral_liquidity_fee = 4 [
(gogoproto.customtype) = "cosmossdk.io/math.LegacyDec",
(gogoproto.nullable) = false
];The fields are defined as string with the correct customtype annotation to use cosmossdk.io/math.LegacyDec, which is the expected and proper way to define decimal fields in protobuf for Cosmos SDK.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that 'tax_rate' and 'unilateral_liquidity_fee' fields in 'Params' messages use 'cosmossdk.io/math.LegacyDec' as their type.
# Search all '.proto' files for the 'Params' message and check the field types.
fd --extension proto | xargs rg -A10 'message Params' | rg -E 'tax_rate|unilateral_liquidity_fee'
Length of output: 496
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the proto definitions
# First, let's find all proto files
echo "=== Finding all .proto files ==="
fd -e proto
# Then let's look for the Params message definition
echo -e "\n=== Searching for Params message definition ==="
fd -e proto | xargs grep -l "message Params" | while read -r file; do
echo -e "\n=== Content of $file containing Params ==="
cat "$file" | grep -A 20 "message Params"
done
Length of output: 7404
| @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ type Inputs struct { | |||
|
|
|||
| Config *modulev1.Module | |||
| Cdc codec.Codec | |||
| Key *store.KVStoreKey | |||
| Key *storetypes.KVStoreKey | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Store-related imports need to be updated for consistency
Several files are still using the old store package imports and need to be updated to use storetypes consistently:
modules/htlc/depinject.go: Changestore "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/store/types"tostoretypes "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/store/types"modules/farm/depinject.go: Changestore "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/store/types"tostoretypes "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/store/types"modules/farm/keeper/grpc_query.go: Update import from"github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/store/prefix"to use the new package path
While the type declarations in keeper structs are correctly using storetypes.StoreKey and storetypes.KVStoreKey, the import aliases need to be standardized across the codebase to use storetypes consistently.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify related dependency updates
The type change to *storetypes.KVStoreKey is correct for the SDK upgrade. Let's verify that all related dependencies are properly updated.
Let me gather more information to verify the consistency of store-related imports and types.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all store-related imports are updated consistently
# and check go.mod for correct cosmos-sdk version
# Check for any remaining old store imports
rg -l "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/store"
# Check go.mod for cosmos-sdk version
cat go.mod | grep "cosmos-sdk"
# Check for consistent usage of storetypes
rg "store\.KVStoreKey"
Length of output: 659
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual import statements in files still using old store package
rg -A 3 "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/store" modules/htlc/depinject.go modules/htlc/keeper/keeper.go modules/farm/depinject.go modules/farm/keeper/keeper.go modules/farm/keeper/grpc_query.go
# Check if storetypes is imported in these files
rg "storetypes" modules/htlc/depinject.go modules/htlc/keeper/keeper.go modules/farm/depinject.go modules/farm/keeper/keeper.go modules/farm/keeper/grpc_query.go
# Check the store key type declarations in keeper structs
ast-grep --pattern 'type Keeper struct {
$$$
storeKey $$$
$$$
}'
Length of output: 6832
| deltaFeeUnilateral := sdkmath.LegacyOneDec().Sub(k.GetParams(ctx).UnilateralLiquidityFee) | ||
| numerator := sdkmath.NewIntFromBigInt(deltaFeeUnilateral.BigInt()) | ||
| denominator := sdkmath.NewIntWithDecimal(1, sdk.Precision) | ||
| denominator := sdkmath.NewIntWithDecimal(1, sdkmath.LegacyPrecision) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent decimal type usage detected in farm module
The verification reveals that while the coinswap module consistently uses LegacyDec and LegacyPrecision, the farm module still uses the older sdk.Dec type. This inconsistency should be addressed:
modules/farm/types/params.go: Usessdk.Decfor tax rate parametermodules/farm/keeper/params.go: Usessdk.Decfor tax rate operationsmodules/farm/keeper/keeper_test.go: Usessdk.Decfor reward calculationsmodules/farm/migrations/v2/migrate.go: Usessdk.Decin migration codemodules/farm/simulation/genesis.go: Usessdk.Decfor tax rate in genesis
These files should be updated to use math.LegacyDec for consistency with the cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 changes, similar to how it's implemented in the coinswap module.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify consistent usage of LegacyDec across the codebase
The introduction of LegacyDec and LegacyPrecision aligns with cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 changes. Let's verify consistent usage across the codebase.
Also applies to: 874-876
Let me analyze the specific usage patterns to ensure consistency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining non-legacy decimal usage that might need updating
# Search for potential decimal usage that might need to be updated
rg -l "sdk\.Dec|\.Dec\(" --type go
# Search for existing LegacyDec usage
rg -l "LegacyDec|LegacyPrecision" --type go
Length of output: 1215
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual usage patterns in files that still use non-legacy Dec
rg "sdk\.Dec|\.Dec\(" --type go -A 2 modules/farm/types/params.go modules/farm/migrations/v2/migrate.go modules/farm/simulation/genesis.go modules/farm/keeper/keeper_test.go modules/farm/keeper/params.go
# Check the context of LegacyDec usage in coinswap module
rg "LegacyDec|LegacyPrecision" --type go -A 2 modules/coinswap/
Length of output: 7577
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
modules/coinswap/go.mod (1)
Line range hint
197-209: Track TODO comments for future cleanupThe replacement directives include TODO comments for future cleanup:
- Remove dgrijalva/jwt-go replacement (cosmos-sdk#13134)
- Remove gin-gonic/gin replacement (cosmos-sdk#10409)
Consider creating tracking issues for these cleanup tasks.
Would you like me to create GitHub issues to track these cleanup tasks?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
modules/coinswap/go.mod(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
modules/coinswap/go.mod (3)
3-3: LGTM: Go version upgrade to 1.21
The upgrade to Go 1.21 is appropriate as it's required for compatibility with cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 and brings important security updates and performance improvements.
33-195: Verify security advisories for indirect dependencies
Several indirect dependencies have been updated. Let's verify there are no known security advisories for critical dependencies.
✅ Verification successful
All critical dependencies are using secure versions
Based on the security advisory check results:
golang.org/x/crypto v0.26.0is secure (latest advisory requires v0.17.0+)github.com/gorilla/websocket v1.5.3is secure (latest advisory requires v1.4.1+)github.com/prometheus/client_golang v1.20.1is secure (latest advisory requires v1.11.1+)- No security advisories found for
cloud.google.com/goandgit.luolix.top/cockroachdb/pebble
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for security advisories in critical dependencies
# Check for security advisories in critical dependencies
for pkg in "cloud.google.com/go" "golang.org/x/crypto" "github.com/cockroachdb/pebble" "github.com/gorilla/websocket" "github.com/prometheus/client_golang"
do
echo "Checking advisories for $pkg..."
gh api graphql -f query='{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: GO, package: "'$pkg'") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
done
Length of output: 5089
6-28: Verify compatibility between major version upgrades
The upgrade to cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 brings significant changes including:
- Major version bumps for core dependencies
- New required dependencies from cosmossdk.io namespace
- Updated protobuf and gRPC dependencies
Let's verify the compatibility between these versions.
✅ Verification successful
The verification results show consistent version usage across the codebase:
- All modules are using the same version of CometBFT (v0.38.12) alongside Cosmos SDK v0.50.x, which is the expected compatibility pairing.
- The cosmossdk.io dependencies show consistent versioning with
core v0.11.1being used uniformly across all modules.
Let me verify one more aspect regarding the new cosmossdk.io dependencies:
✓ Dependencies are properly aligned across all modules
The verification confirms that:
- All modules consistently use CometBFT v0.38.12 with Cosmos SDK v0.50.x
- New cosmossdk.io dependencies are uniformly versioned across all modules:
- store v1.1.1
- log v1.4.1
- x/evidence v0.1.1
- x/feegrant v0.1.1
- x/upgrade v0.1.4
The dependency versions are compatible and properly synchronized across the entire codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify compatibility between major dependencies
# Check for any known compatibility issues in go.mod files
echo "Checking for compatibility issues between cosmos-sdk and cometbft..."
rg -l "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk.*v0.50" | xargs rg "github.com/cometbft/cometbft.*v0.38"
# Check for any mismatched versions of common dependencies
echo "Checking for mismatched versions of common dependencies..."
rg -l "cosmossdk.io/api.*v0.7.5" | xargs rg "cosmossdk.io/core.*v0.11.1"
Length of output: 5165
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if new cosmossdk.io dependencies are consistently used across modules
echo "Checking cosmossdk.io/store version consistency..."
rg -l "cosmossdk.io/store.*v1.1.1"
echo "Checking cosmossdk.io/log version consistency..."
rg -l "cosmossdk.io/log.*v1.4.1"
echo "Checking if x/* modules versions are consistent..."
rg -l "cosmossdk.io/x/evidence.*v0.1.1"
rg -l "cosmossdk.io/x/feegrant.*v0.1.1"
rg -l "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade.*v0.1.4"
Length of output: 2267
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
proto/irismod/htlc/htlc.proto (2)
Line range hint
1-124: Architecture Review: Clean upgrade to cosmos-sdk v0.50.10The changes demonstrate a clean transition to the new cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 math types. The modifications:
- Consistently use
cosmossdk.io/math.Intacross all numerical fields- Maintain existing protobuf structure and constraints
- Handle breaking changes appropriately
Consider creating a migration guide for users of this module, as these protobuf changes will require updates in dependent code.
Documentation update needed for supply limit changes
The changes to
cosmossdk.io/math.Intin the supply limit fields are correct, but the documentation inmodules/htlc/spec/04_params.mdneeds to be updated to reflect the new type. The documentation currently shows the old type definition.
modules/htlc/spec/04_params.md: Update the code example to showlimitandtime_based_limitfields usingcosmossdk.io/math.Intinstead of the old type.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
112-123: LGTM! Consider updating related documentation.The update to
cosmossdk.io/math.Intfor supply limit fields is correct and consistent with the module upgrade. Since these are breaking changes affecting numerical types used in supply limits, ensure any related documentation or integration guides are updated.Let's check for any documentation files that might need updates:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for documentation files that might reference the old types fd -e md -e rst | xargs rg "cosmos-sdk/types\.Int|Int from cosmos-sdk"Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a broader search for documentation files mentioning supply limits or HTLC fd -e md -e rst | xargs rg -i "supply.*limit|htlc" # Also search for any code comments or documentation strings mentioning supply limits rg -g "!*.md" -g "!*.rst" -C 2 "supply.*limit" --type proto --type goLength of output: 5288
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the specific documentation for supply limits in HTLC params cat modules/htlc/spec/04_params.md # Also check any Go code that might have documentation about supply limits rg -t go -C 3 "SupplyLimit"Length of output: 65238
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
modules/htlc/types/htlc.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
api/irismod/htlc/htlc.pulsar.go(2 hunks)proto/irismod/htlc/htlc.proto(3 hunks)
Closed: #438
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
MsgAddUnilateralLiquidity,MsgRemoveLiquidity, andMsgSwapOrder.HTLC,AssetSupply, andParams.Improvements
Bug Fixes
Documentation