bump up mods.irisnet.org/modules/farm to cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 #466
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces extensive modifications to the farm module, primarily updating data structures and method signatures to improve functionality and compatibility with the latest version of the cosmos-sdk (v0.50.10). Key changes include the addition of new fields in various structures, adjustments to existing methods to utilize new context types, and a shift from Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (26)
modules/farm/keeper/invariants.go (1)
Line range hint
1-47: Consider adding test coverage for invariant checksWhile the invariant implementation looks correct, it would be beneficial to add test coverage specifically for the balance comparison changes to ensure the behavior remains consistent with the upgrade.
Would you like me to help create test cases for the invariant checks?
modules/farm/types/params.go (2)
23-25: Consider documenting the default parameter valuesThe type changes from
sdktomathpackage are correct, but it would be helpful to add comments explaining the chosen default values:
- Pool creation fee of 5000 default bond denom
- Tax rate of 0.4 (40%)
return NewParams( + // Default pool creation fee: 5000 stake sdk.NewCoin(sdk.DefaultBondDenom, math.NewInt(5000)), 2, + // Default tax rate: 40% math.LegacyNewDecWithPrec(4, 1), )
53-60: LGTM with a minor suggestion for the error messageThe type changes and validation logic are correct, but we could make the error message more precise.
- return fmt.Errorf("tax rate must be positive and less than 1: %s", v.String()) + return fmt.Errorf("tax rate must be strictly between 0 and 1, got: %s", v.String())modules/farm/keeper/proposal_hook.go (1)
37-40: LGTM! Consider enhancing the error log with module context.The improved error handling is well-implemented and aligns with Cosmos SDK v0.50.10 patterns. The structured logging provides good visibility into failures.
Consider adding the module name to the error log for better context in aggregated logs:
- h.k.Logger(ctx).Error("failed to get proposal", "proposalID", proposalID, "err", err) + h.k.Logger(ctx).Error("failed to get proposal", "module", "farm", "proposalID", proposalID, "err", err)modules/farm/keeper/queue.go (1)
64-64: Consider pagination for large datasetsWhile the iterator update is correct, consider implementing pagination for this method as iterating over all pools could become a performance bottleneck as the number of pools grows.
Consider adding a paginated version of this method:
func (k Keeper) IteratorAllPoolsPaginated(ctx sdk.Context, pageRequest *query.PageRequest, fun func(pool types.FarmPool)) (*query.PageResponse, error)modules/farm/types/farm.go (3)
31-32: Fix typo in method name: "CaclRewards" should be "CalcRewards"The method name contains a typo that should be corrected for better code maintainability and searchability.
-func (pool FarmPool) CaclRewards(farmInfo FarmInfo, deltaAmt sdkmath.Int) (rewards, rewardDebt sdk.Coins) { +func (pool FarmPool) CalcRewards(farmInfo FarmInfo, deltaAmt sdkmath.Int) (rewards, rewardDebt sdk.Coins) {
Test coverage for reward calculations needs improvement
The existing test coverage for
CaclRewardsfunction has some limitations:
- Only tests positive scenarios with non-zero locked amounts
- Missing edge cases for zero amounts and zero reward per share
- No tests for potential overflow scenarios with large numbers
- Typo in the test function name (
CaclRewardsinstead ofCalcRewards)Suggested improvements:
- Add test cases for zero locked amounts
- Add test cases for zero deltaAmt
- Add test cases with very large numbers to verify no overflow
- Fix the typo in the test function name
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
32-41: LGTM! Math type migration looks correctThe change from
sdk.ZeroInt()tosdkmath.ZeroInt()is consistent with the cosmos-sdk v0.50.x requirements.Let's verify the test coverage for these financial calculations:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check test coverage for reward calculations # Look for test files covering reward calculations rg -l "TestCalcRewards|TestCaclRewards" --type go # Check for existing test cases with different scenarios rg -A 10 "func Test.*Rewards" --type goLength of output: 669
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the actual test implementation to verify coverage of different scenarios # Check the full test implementation cat modules/farm/types/farm_test.goLength of output: 3704
Method
CaclRewardsis used in multiple locations and needs to be renamed consistentlyThe method
CaclRewardsis currently used in:
modules/farm/types/farm.go: Method declarationmodules/farm/types/farm_test.go: Test implementationmodules/farm/keeper/grpc_query.go: Query implementationmodules/farm/keeper/farmer.go: Multiple usages in farmer operationsThe method is misspelled as
CaclRewardsacross the codebase and there are no existing usages of the correct spellingCalcRewards. All instances should be renamed to fix the typo.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
31-41: Verify impact of method rename across the codebaseSince we're suggesting renaming the method from
CaclRewardstoCalcRewards, we should verify all usage locations.
Let me try a different search strategy to verify the method usage.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for all usages of the CaclRewards method # Search for current method usage echo "Current usage of CaclRewards:" ast-grep --pattern 'CaclRewards($$$)' # Search for any existing correct spelling to avoid conflicts echo "Checking for existing CalcRewards usage:" ast-grep --pattern 'CalcRewards($$$)'Length of output: 239
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for method declarations and usages with ripgrep for better context echo "Searching for CaclRewards:" rg -i "caclrewards" -A 2 -B 2 echo -e "\nSearching for CalcRewards:" rg -i "calcrewards" -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 2684
modules/farm/migrations/v2/migrate.go (1)
Missing migration tests for farm module v2
The migration implementation is present and properly registered in the keeper, but there are no corresponding tests for the v2 migration in the farm module. This is concerning because:
- Other modules (service, token, htlc, nft, coinswap) have proper migration tests
- The migration includes critical changes like:
- Setting new default values for PoolCreationFee and TaxRate
- Granting burner permissions to the farm module account
Please add comprehensive tests for the v2 migration to ensure:
- Parameter migration works correctly
- Module account permissions are properly updated
- Error cases are handled appropriately
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
28-45: Verify migration testing and upgrade path.The migration logic correctly uses the updated
DefaultTaxRateand maintains the burner permission handling. However, we should ensure proper testing of the upgrade path.Let's check for migration tests:
The initial results show migration files but we need to specifically verify the v2 farm migration tests and upgrade handler registration. Let's examine these aspects more closely.
Let's examine the v2 migration implementation and its tests more specifically, as the previous search patterns needed adjustment.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for migration tests rg -g "*test.go" "TestMigrate|TestUpgrade" # Check for any existing migrations to ensure proper sequencing fd "migrate.go" -t fLength of output: 989
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for v2 migration tests in farm module rg -g "farm/*test.go" "TestMigrate" -B 2 -A 10 # Check upgrade handler registration rg "RegisterUpgradeHandler.*v2" -A 5 # Look for farm module v2 tests fd "v2" --type f -p "*test.go" -d 2 modules/farm/migrationsLength of output: 387
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for v2 migration tests in farm module with correct path rg -g "*/farm/migrations/v2/*test.go" "TestMigrate" -B 2 -A 10 # Look for upgrade handler registration in app.go or similar files rg "v2.Migrate" -A 3 # Check contents of the migrate.go file to understand the migration scope cat modules/farm/migrations/v2/migrate.goLength of output: 5607
modules/farm/depinject.go (1)
Line range hint
1-89: Consider updating module documentationThe changes look good overall, but it would be helpful to update the module's documentation to reflect:
- The SDK version compatibility requirements
- The optional nature of DistrKeeper and its implications
Would you like me to help draft the documentation updates?
proto/irismod/farm/farm.proto (2)
78-80: LGTM! Appropriate use of LegacyDec for rate calculationThe
tax_ratefield correctly usesmath.LegacyDecwhich is appropriate for rate/percentage calculations requiring decimal precision.For future updates, consider documenting the decimal precision requirements and valid ranges for tax_rate in the proto comments. This helps maintain consistency across different implementations and makes validation requirements clear.
Line range hint
1-120: Consider adding versioning information to the proto packageThe module's proto definitions look solid. For better maintainability and version tracking:
- Consider adding a version suffix to the package name (e.g.,
irismod.farm.v1)- Add comments documenting the cosmos-sdk version compatibility
- Consider adding
Since:tags to fields using the new math typesExample:
// package irismod.farm.v1 // Requires cosmos-sdk v0.50.0+modules/farm/types/farm_test.go (1)
Line range hint
73-157: Fix typo in test function nameThe function name
CaclRewardscontains a typo and should beCalcRewards.-func TestFarmPool_CaclRewards(t *testing.T) { +func TestFarmPool_CalcRewards(t *testing.T) {modules/farm/keeper/proposal.go (1)
69-74: Fix typo in variable name: 'feelPool' should be 'feePool'While the error handling improvements are good, there's a typo in the variable name that should be fixed for consistency and clarity.
Apply this diff to fix the typo:
- feelPool, err := k.dk.GetFeePool(ctx) + feePool, err := k.dk.GetFeePool(ctx) if err != nil { return err } - feelPool.CommunityPool = feelPool.CommunityPool.Add(sdk.NewDecCoinsFromCoins(sdk.NewCoins(refundTotal...)...)...) - return k.dk.SetFeePool(ctx, feelPool) + feePool.CommunityPool = feePool.CommunityPool.Add(sdk.NewDecCoinsFromCoins(sdk.NewCoins(refundTotal...)...)...) + return k.dk.SetFeePool(ctx, feePool)modules/farm/keeper/grpc_query.go (1)
139-147: Approve math package migration, but note method name typoThe migration from
sdk.ZeroInt()tomath.ZeroInt()is correct and aligns with the cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 update. However, there's a typo in the method nameCaclRewards(should beCalcRewards).- rewards, _ := pool.CaclRewards(farmer, math.ZeroInt()) + rewards, _ := pool.CalcRewards(farmer, math.ZeroInt())modules/farm/keeper/farmer.go (2)
62-64: Consider consistent usage of math packageWhile the change to
math.ZeroInt()is correct, consider updatingRewardDebtinitialization to use the math package as well for consistency with the cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 migration pattern.
Line range hint
1-246: Fix typo in method name throughout the fileThere's a typo in the method name
CaclRewards(should beCalcRewards) used throughout the file. While not directly related to the current changes, it would be good to fix this for better code maintainability.modules/farm/keeper/msg_server.go (1)
Based on the verification results, I can now provide a final response:
Update required for cosmos-sdk v0.50.x compatibility
Several compatibility issues need to be addressed:
- The file uses
govv1.MsgExecLegacyContentwhich is deprecated in cosmos-sdk v0.50.x- Event emission uses the legacy pattern
ctx.EventManager().EmitEvents(sdk.Events{sdk.NewEvent(...)})- Direct usage of
sdkerrors.ErrUnauthorizedshould be replaced witherrorsmodThe code needs to be updated to:
- Replace
MsgExecLegacyContentwith the new governance message types- Use the new event emission pattern from v0.50.x
- Use
errorsmodconsistently instead ofsdkerrors🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-324: Verify cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 compatibility across the fileWhile the immediate change is minimal, let's ensure full compatibility with cosmos-sdk v0.50.10:
- Import statements use the latest paths
- No deprecated types or methods are in use
- Error handling follows the latest patterns
- Event emission follows the latest patterns
Let me analyze the results and generate additional verification scripts to check for specific compatibility concerns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify compatibility with cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 # Check for deprecated import paths rg -l 'github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/errors' # Check for deprecated method usage patterns ast-grep --pattern 'sdk.NewEvent($$$)' # Check error handling patterns ast-grep --pattern 'errorsmod.Wrap($$$)' # Check for any TODO or DEPRECATED markers rg -i "todo|deprecated|fixme"Length of output: 39785
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for specific deprecated patterns in cosmos-sdk v0.50.x # Check for legacy event emission patterns rg -A 2 'ctx.EventManager\(\).EmitEvents\(' modules/farm/keeper/msg_server.go # Check for specific deprecated types/methods from cosmos-sdk rg -l 'govv1.MsgExecLegacyContent' # Check for any direct usage of deprecated cosmos-sdk error types rg -A 1 'sdkerrors\.' modules/farm/keeper/msg_server.go # Check for any legacy governance proposal handling ast-grep --pattern 'SubmitProposal($$$)'Length of output: 974
modules/farm/keeper/pool.go (2)
Line range hint
247-265: Consider performance implications of decimal operationsThe changes to use
math.ZeroInt()andmath.LegacyNewDecFromIntare consistent with the SDK upgrade. However, decimal operations can be computationally expensive. Consider:
- Batching multiple decimal operations where possible
- Pre-calculating common values to reduce repeated conversions
Example optimization:
- newRewardPerShare := math.LegacyNewDecFromInt(rewardCollected).QuoInt(pool.TotalLptLocked.Amount) + // Pre-calculate for multiple rewards + totalLptLockedDec := math.LegacyNewDecFromInt(pool.TotalLptLocked.Amount) + newRewardPerShare := math.LegacyNewDecFromInt(rewardCollected).Quo(totalLptLockedDec)
Line range hint
1-300: Consider documenting the math package transition strategyThe file shows a systematic transition from
sdktomathpackage types. To ensure a smooth long-term evolution:
- Document the transition strategy from legacy to non-legacy decimal types
- Consider adding unit tests specifically for decimal precision and rounding behavior
- Plan for future deprecation of legacy decimal types
modules/farm/keeper/keeper_test.go (2)
158-159: Consider extracting magic numbers into named constantsThe test uses several magic numbers for coin amounts (e.g., 10_000_000). Consider extracting these into named constants to improve test readability and maintainability.
var ( + testAdjustmentAmount = math.NewInt(10_000_000) // ... existing variables ... ) - sdk.NewCoin(sdk.DefaultBondDenom, math.NewInt(10_000_000)), - sdk.NewCoin("uiris", math.NewInt(10_000_000)), + sdk.NewCoin(sdk.DefaultBondDenom, testAdjustmentAmount), + sdk.NewCoin("uiris", testAdjustmentAmount),Also applies to: 190-191, 202-202
447-447: Remove unnecessary blank lineRemove the extra blank line to comply with gofumpt formatting rules.
err, broken := keeper.RewardInvariant(suite.keeper)(ctx) suite.Require().False(broken, err) } - }🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
447-447: File is not
gofumpt-ed with-extra(gofumpt)
modules/farm/simulation/operations.go (2)
Line range hint
169-176: Consider consolidating zero-value checksThe zero-value checks for
rewardPerBlockandtotalRewardcould be combined for better readability and maintainability.Consider refactoring to:
- if rewardPerBlock.Amount.LTE(math.ZeroInt()) { - return simtypes.NoOpMsg( - types.ModuleName, - types.TypeMsgCreatePool, - "rewardPerBlock less than zeroInt", - ), nil, nil - } - - if totalReward.Amount.LTE(rewardPerBlock.Amount) { + if rewardPerBlock.Amount.LTE(math.ZeroInt()) || totalReward.Amount.LTE(rewardPerBlock.Amount) { return simtypes.NoOpMsg( types.ModuleName, types.TypeMsgCreatePool, - "totalReward less than rewardPerBlock", + "invalid reward configuration", ), nil, nil }
237-237: Standardize operation message returnsAll simulation handlers have been correctly updated to use
nilas the third argument inNewOperationMsg. However, consider standardizing the success message pattern across all handlers for better maintainability.Consider adding a constant for the empty success message:
+const ( + successMsg = "" +) -return simtypes.NewOperationMsg(msg, true, ""), nil, nil +return simtypes.NewOperationMsg(msg, true, successMsg), nil, nilAlso applies to: 389-389, 496-496, 601-601, 680-680, 787-787
modules/farm/go.mod (2)
17-17: Consider upgrading to a stable release ofgit.luolix.top/cosmos/cosmos-protoThe dependency
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-protois currently set to versionv1.0.0-beta.5, which is a beta release. Using beta versions may introduce instability into the codebase. It's recommended to use a stable release version to ensure reliability and avoid potential issues associated with pre-release software.
29-30: Replace pseudo-versions with tagged releases formods.irisnet.org/apiandmods.irisnet.org/simappThe dependencies
mods.irisnet.org/apiandmods.irisnet.org/simappare referenced using pseudo-versions (v0.0.0-...), which can make dependency management and version tracking more challenging. Consider tagging these modules with proper semantic version numbers and updating thego.modfile accordingly to improve clarity and maintainability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
modules/farm/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.summodules/farm/types/farm.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (27)
api/irismod/farm/farm.pulsar.go(1 hunks)modules/farm/abci.go(1 hunks)modules/farm/depinject.go(2 hunks)modules/farm/go.mod(1 hunks)modules/farm/keeper/depinject_test.go(2 hunks)modules/farm/keeper/farm_info.go(3 hunks)modules/farm/keeper/farmer.go(5 hunks)modules/farm/keeper/fees.go(2 hunks)modules/farm/keeper/grpc_query.go(2 hunks)modules/farm/keeper/invariants.go(1 hunks)modules/farm/keeper/keeper.go(3 hunks)modules/farm/keeper/keeper_test.go(15 hunks)modules/farm/keeper/msg_server.go(1 hunks)modules/farm/keeper/params.go(2 hunks)modules/farm/keeper/pool.go(6 hunks)modules/farm/keeper/proposal.go(5 hunks)modules/farm/keeper/proposal_hook.go(1 hunks)modules/farm/keeper/queue.go(4 hunks)modules/farm/migrations/v2/migrate.go(2 hunks)modules/farm/module.go(2 hunks)modules/farm/simulation/genesis.go(1 hunks)modules/farm/simulation/operations.go(10 hunks)modules/farm/types/expected_keeper.go(1 hunks)modules/farm/types/farm.go(2 hunks)modules/farm/types/farm_test.go(3 hunks)modules/farm/types/params.go(3 hunks)proto/irismod/farm/farm.proto(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
modules/farm/keeper/keeper_test.go
447-447: File is not gofumpt-ed with -extra
(gofumpt)
🔇 Additional comments (59)
modules/farm/abci.go (2)
Line range hint 16-33: LGTM: Robust error handling and logging maintained
The error handling and logging implementation remains comprehensive, properly tracking pool expiration and refund operations with detailed context for debugging.
4-5: LGTM: Context handling updates align with Cosmos SDK v0.50.10
The changes correctly implement the new context handling pattern required by Cosmos SDK v0.50.10, properly unwrapping the context while maintaining the existing functionality.
Let's verify this change is consistent with other ABCI interface implementations:
Also applies to: 13-14
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Context handling updates are consistent across ABCI interfaces
The verification confirms that the context handling changes in modules/farm/abci.go align with the Cosmos SDK v0.50.10 pattern and are consistent with other ABCI implementations:
- BeginBlocker implementations in other modules (htlc, random) correctly use
context.Contextwith proper unwrapping - EndBlocker in farm module follows the same pattern as other ABCI interfaces
- All ABCI interfaces consistently use
sdk.UnwrapSDKContext(c)to maintain functionality
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify context handling in other ABCI interfaces
# Expected: All ABCI interfaces should use context.Context
# Check BeginBlocker and EndBlocker signatures
ast-grep --pattern 'func BeginBlocker(c context.Context, $$$)'
ast-grep --pattern 'func EndBlocker(c context.Context, $$$)'
# Check for any remaining sdk.Context parameters in ABCI interfaces
rg -l "func.*\(.*sdk\.Context.*\)"
Length of output: 10167
modules/farm/keeper/fees.go (2)
4-4: LGTM: Required import for SDK v0.50.10 compatibility
The addition of cosmossdk.io/math import aligns with the PR objective of upgrading to cosmos-sdk v0.50.10.
17-17: Consider using non-legacy decimal conversion
The use of math.LegacyNewDecFromInt might not be the most future-proof approach, as the "Legacy" prefix typically indicates deprecated or soon-to-be-deprecated functionality.
Let's verify if there's a recommended non-legacy alternative in cosmos-sdk v0.50.10:
Consider investigating if there's a recommended non-legacy alternative for decimal conversion in cosmos-sdk v0.50.10. This would ensure better long-term maintainability of the code.
modules/farm/keeper/params.go (2)
4-4: LGTM: Import addition aligns with Cosmos SDK v0.50.x changes
The addition of cosmossdk.io/math import is correct and necessary for the transition from sdk.Dec to math.LegacyDec types.
21-21: LGTM: Correct migration to math.LegacyDec
The change from sdk.Dec to math.LegacyDec aligns with Cosmos SDK v0.50.x type migrations.
Let's verify the consistency of this type change across the module:
✅ Verification successful
Type migration is consistent across the module
Based on the search results, I can confirm that:
- The
TaxRatefield in the farm module'sParamsstruct is usingcosmossdk_io_math.LegacyDec - All usages of TaxRate across the module are consistent with the migration
- The migration includes both the keeper method and the underlying parameter type
- No remaining
sdk.Decusages were found for tax rate related code
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent usage of math.LegacyDec for tax rate across the module
# Expected: All tax rate related code should use math.LegacyDec instead of sdk.Dec
# Check for any remaining sdk.Dec usage in tax rate related code
rg -A 2 -B 2 "TaxRate.*sdk\.Dec" modules/farm/
# Check if the parameter type in types.Params is updated
ast-grep --pattern 'type Params struct {
$$$
TaxRate math.LegacyDec
$$$
}'
Length of output: 131
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find all TaxRate related code and type definitions
# Search for TaxRate in all Go files
rg -t go "TaxRate" modules/farm/
# Search for any remaining sdk.Dec usages
rg -t go "sdk\.Dec" modules/farm/
# Find the Params struct definition
fd -e go -x cat {} \; -x echo "---" \; | rg -A 10 -B 2 "type Params struct"
Length of output: 12292
modules/farm/keeper/invariants.go (1)
38-38: Verify SDK v0.50.10 compatibility for balance comparison
The change from IsEqual to Equal aligns with cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 updates. Let's verify this is the only instance requiring updates and that the behavior remains consistent.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the types and methods being used in the farm keeper.
Based on the comprehensive analysis of the codebase, I can now provide the final response:
Change from IsEqual to Equal is correct and consistent
The change from IsEqual to Equal in the farm keeper's invariant check is correct for cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 compatibility. The evidence shows:
- The changed line is the only instance of balance comparison in the farm keeper's invariants
- Other balance comparisons in the module already use
Equal - The remaining
IsEqualinstances in the codebase are in test files or in different contexts (htlc and token modules) - The
sdk.Coinstype from cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 usesEqualas the standard comparison method
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of IsEqual and verify Equal usage in cosmos-sdk v0.50.10
# Check for any remaining IsEqual instances that might need updating
echo "Checking for remaining IsEqual instances..."
rg "IsEqual" --type go
# Verify the usage of Equal in cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 for reference
echo "Checking Equal usage in similar contexts..."
rg "Equal.*balance" --type go
Length of output: 3015
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the type declarations and imports in the farm keeper
echo "Checking farm keeper invariants file..."
cat modules/farm/keeper/invariants.go
# Look for other Equal/IsEqual usage in farm module
echo -e "\nChecking Equal/IsEqual usage in farm module..."
rg -A 2 "(Equal|IsEqual)" modules/farm/
Length of output: 15193
modules/farm/simulation/genesis.go (3)
39-41: LGTM!
The MaxRewardCategoryN parameter generation is correctly implemented.
Line range hint 43-56: LGTM!
The genesis state creation and marshaling logic is well-implemented with proper error handling.
24-24: Verify consistent usage of math.LegacyDec across the farm module
The type change from sdk.Dec to math.LegacyDec is aligned with the cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 upgrade. However, we should ensure this change is consistently applied across the farm module.
✅ Verification successful
Type change from sdk.Dec to math.LegacyDec is consistently applied
The verification shows that the farm module has been consistently updated to use math.LegacyDec (or its alias sdkmath.LegacyDec) across all relevant files:
- types/params.go: Uses
math.LegacyDecfor tax rate parameter - types/farm.pb.go: Uses
cosmossdk_io_math.LegacyDecin protobuf definitions - simulation/genesis.go: Uses
math.LegacyDecfor tax rate - keeper/params.go: Uses
math.LegacyDecfor tax rate getter - migrations/v2/migrate.go: Uses
sdkmath.LegacyDecfor migration - keeper/keeper_test.go: Uses
math.LegacyDecfor reward calculations
No instances of sdk.Dec remain in the farm module, confirming the type change is complete and consistent.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining sdk.Dec usages in the farm module
rg --type go "sdk\.Dec" modules/farm/
# Search for math.LegacyDec usage to verify consistent adoption
rg --type go "math\.LegacyDec" modules/farm/
Length of output: 1394
modules/farm/types/params.go (2)
4-8: LGTM: Import changes align with the SDK upgrade
The addition of cosmossdk.io/math and adjustment of imports are appropriate for the migration to cosmos-sdk v0.50.10.
12-12: Verify the use of math.LegacyDec
While the change from sdk.Dec to math.LegacyDec is consistent with the SDK upgrade, we should verify if this is the recommended approach in cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 or if we should use a non-legacy type.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that math.LegacyDec is widely used throughout the codebase, particularly in proto definitions and parameter types. The usage appears to be consistent with the SDK's migration pattern, where LegacyDec is used for decimal values in protocol buffer definitions and parameter types.
Let me verify if there are any newer decimal types being used in the codebase:
Let me try a different approach to check the imports and decimal type usage:
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the use of math.LegacyDec:
Use of math.LegacyDec is appropriate in this context
The use of math.LegacyDec is the correct approach as evidenced by:
- Consistent usage throughout the codebase in similar parameter types and proto definitions
- Wide adoption in other core modules like token, service, coinswap, and farm modules
- Used specifically in proto definitions with
(gogoproto.customtype) = "cosmossdk.io/math.LegacyDec" - No usage of newer decimal types found in the codebase
The LegacyDec type is not just a transitional type but rather the standard decimal implementation in Cosmos SDK v0.50.x for protocol buffer compatibility and parameter types.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for patterns of math.LegacyDec usage in cosmos-sdk v0.50.10
# to confirm if this is the recommended approach
# Check for any migration guides or documentation
fd -t f README.md MIGRATION.md UPGRADING.md | xargs rg -l "LegacyDec"
# Check for usage patterns in the codebase
rg "math\.LegacyDec" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 37720
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for usage of newer decimal types
rg "math\.Dec[^a]" -l
# Check go.mod for cosmos-sdk version
cat go.mod | rg "cosmos-sdk"
Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check imports for math package usage
rg "\"cosmossdk.io/math\"" -A 3
# Check for any documentation about decimal types
fd README.md | xargs rg -i "decimal|math.Dec"
# Look for any migration guides
fd UPGRADING CHANGELOG -t f | xargs rg -i "decimal|math.Dec"
Length of output: 32411
modules/farm/keeper/farm_info.go (3)
4-4: LGTM: Import change aligns with cosmos-sdk v0.50.10
The addition of storetypes import from cosmossdk.io/store/types is correct and consistent with the SDK's modular architecture in v0.50.10.
35-35: LGTM: Iterator update is consistent
The change to storetypes.KVStorePrefixIterator is consistent with the previous update and maintains the same functionality.
24-24: LGTM: Iterator update is correct
The change from sdk.KVStorePrefixIterator to storetypes.KVStorePrefixIterator is appropriate and maintains the same functionality.
Let's verify that all KVStorePrefixIterator usages have been updated consistently:
✅ Verification successful
All iterator usages have been consistently updated
All instances of KVStorePrefixIterator in the codebase are using the new storetypes.KVStorePrefixIterator, and no occurrences of the old sdk.KVStorePrefixIterator were found. The migration has been completed consistently across all modules.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining usage of sdk.KVStorePrefixIterator
rg "sdk\.KVStorePrefixIterator"
# Search for the new usage to confirm the pattern
rg "storetypes\.KVStorePrefixIterator"
Length of output: 5414
modules/farm/keeper/queue.go (3)
4-4: LGTM: Import change aligns with cosmos-sdk v0.50.x standards
The update to use storetypes from cosmossdk.io/store/types is consistent with the migration to cosmos-sdk v0.50.10.
52-52: LGTM: Iterator update maintains proper resource handling
The iterator type update is consistent and maintains proper resource cleanup with defer iterator.Close().
40-40: Verify consistent iterator usage across the codebase
The change from sdk.KVStorePrefixIterator to storetypes.KVStorePrefixIterator looks correct. Let's ensure this pattern is consistently applied across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Iterator usage is consistently updated across the codebase
The verification shows that all instances of KVStorePrefixIterator in the codebase are using the new storetypes package. There are no remaining occurrences of sdk.KVStorePrefixIterator, confirming that the migration has been consistently applied across all modules.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining usage of sdk.KVStorePrefixIterator
# Expected: No occurrences of the old iterator type
# Search for any remaining instances of the old iterator
rg "sdk\.KVStorePrefixIterator"
# Search for the new iterator usage to confirm consistent adoption
rg "storetypes\.KVStorePrefixIterator"
Length of output: 5414
modules/farm/types/farm.go (1)
Line range hint 4-9: LGTM! Import changes align with cosmos-sdk v0.50.x requirements
The updates to use cosmossdk.io/math and cosmossdk.io/errors are consistent with the migration requirements for cosmos-sdk v0.50.x.
modules/farm/migrations/v2/migrate.go (2)
14-14: LGTM! Verify other decimal operations in the codebase.
The change to sdkmath.LegacyNewDecWithPrec is correct for cosmos-sdk v0.50.x compatibility.
Let's verify that all similar decimal operations have been updated consistently:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about decimal operations in the farm module to ensure all necessary updates have been made.
Let me try one more verification to check the imports specifically:
Based on the comprehensive verification results, I can now provide the final response:
The decimal type migration in the farm module is complete and consistent
The verification shows that:
- All decimal operations in the farm module are using the new
sdkmath.LegacyDectypes - The
DefaultTaxRatechange is part of a consistent pattern across the module - Test files and core logic properly use the new decimal types from the math package
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining sdk.NewDecWithPrec usages that might need updating
rg "sdk\.NewDecWithPrec" --type go
# Search for other decimal operations that might need similar updates
rg "sdk\.Dec|sdk\.NewDec" --type go
Length of output: 2956
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for decimal-related operations specifically in the farm module
rg "Dec|NewDec|DecWithPrec" --type go modules/farm/
# Check for any remaining sdk.Dec imports in the farm module
rg "sdk\s+\"github\.com\/cosmos\/cosmos-sdk\/types\"" --type go modules/farm/
rg "types\s+\"github\.com\/cosmos\/cosmos-sdk\/types\"" --type go modules/farm/
Length of output: 5161
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for sdk/types imports in the farm module with properly escaped quotes
rg "\"github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types\"" modules/farm/
Length of output: 3309
23-25: Verify protobuf compatibility with the updated types.
The struct field updates look correct, particularly:
- Updated customtype for TaxRate to use
cosmossdk.io/math.LegacyDec - Preserved field ordering and tags
Let's verify the protobuf definitions are in sync:
✅ Verification successful
Protobuf definitions are correctly synchronized with the code changes
The proto file correctly defines the tax_rate field with the updated type cosmossdk.io/math.LegacyDec, which matches the Go struct's use of sdkmath.LegacyDec. The protobuf tags and customtype definitions are properly aligned between the Go code and proto definitions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the proto files have been updated to match the new types
rg "tax_rate" --type proto
# Look for any remaining references to the old sdk.Dec type in proto files
rg "sdk\.Dec" --type proto
Length of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for proto files containing tax_rate
fd -e proto | xargs rg "tax_rate"
# Search for proto files containing sdk.Dec
fd -e proto | xargs rg "sdk\.Dec"
# List all proto files to ensure they exist
fd -e proto
Length of output: 2340
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the specific proto definition for farm module's tax_rate field
cat proto/irismod/farm/farm.proto
# Check for any remaining references to sdk.Dec in farm.proto
rg "sdk\.Dec" proto/irismod/farm/farm.proto
Length of output: 3359
modules/farm/depinject.go (1)
46-46: LGTM: Store key type update
The Key field type update to *storestore.KVStoreKey correctly aligns with the new import path.
proto/irismod/farm/farm.proto (2)
58-60: LGTM! Consistent type update for amount field
The locked field correctly uses math.Int for amount storage, maintaining consistency with other amount fields in the module.
34-47: LGTM! Type updates align with Cosmos SDK v0.50.x standards
The changes correctly update the numeric types to use the new cosmossdk.io/math package:
- Amount fields (
total_reward,remaining_reward,reward_per_block) usemath.Int - Rate field (
reward_per_share) usesmath.LegacyDecfor decimal precision
Let's verify the consistency of these type changes across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Type updates are correctly implemented and consistent across modules
The verification confirms that:
- No proto files contain old-style references to
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types.(Int|Dec) - The new
cosmossdk.io/math.(Int|LegacyDec)types are consistently used across multiple modules including farm, coinswap, service, token, and htlc - The changes in the farm module align with the broader codebase migration to
cosmossdk.io/mathtypes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining old-style Int/Dec type references
rg -l "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types\.(Int|Dec)" --type proto
# Verify all math types are using the new package
rg -l "cosmossdk.io/math\.(Int|LegacyDec)" --type proto
Length of output: 186
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for proto files first
fd '\.proto$'
# Then check for any remaining old-style Int/Dec type references
fd '\.proto$' --exec rg -l "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types\.(Int|Dec)" {}
# And verify all math types are using the new package
fd '\.proto$' --exec rg -l "cosmossdk.io/math\.(Int|LegacyDec)" {}
Length of output: 2335
modules/farm/types/farm_test.go (4)
29-30: LGTM: Appropriate type migration for SDK compatibility
The change from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt is correct and aligns with the cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 update requirements.
Also applies to: 34-35
48-49: LGTM: Consistent type migration across test cases
The changes maintain consistency with the previous test case and properly implement the type migration.
99-102: LGTM: Consistent type migration in test values
The changes to use math.NewInt for all numerical values and coin creation are consistent and correct for the SDK update.
Also applies to: 105-106, 109-110, 128-134, 137-138, 141-142
89-89: Verify the use of LegacyNewDec
While the migration to math.LegacyNewDec is functionally correct, we should verify if this is the intended approach versus using newer alternatives in cosmos-sdk v0.50.10.
Also applies to: 93-93
✅ Verification successful
Use of LegacyNewDec is consistent with codebase migration patterns
The usage of math.LegacyNewDec in the farm test is consistent with the broader codebase migration pattern. The search results show extensive use of LegacyNewDec and related legacy decimal types across multiple modules (farm, token, service, coinswap) including in their core logic, migrations, and parameters. This indicates a deliberate choice to maintain compatibility with the legacy decimal implementation from cosmos-sdk.
Key evidence:
- Used consistently in migration files (v2, v3, v4) across modules
- Applied in critical financial calculations (fees, rates, rewards)
- No usage of newer decimal alternatives found in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of LegacyNewDec to ensure consistency
rg "LegacyNewDec" --type go
# Search for any migration guides or documentation about LegacyNewDec usage
fd -e md -e txt | xargs rg "LegacyNewDec"
Length of output: 10530
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any newer Dec alternatives in the codebase
rg "NewDec|Dec\(" --type go -g '!*test.go' -g '!*legacy*' -A 2 -B 2
# Let's also check for any migration files that might indicate the intended approach
fd -e go | grep -i "migr" | xargs rg "Dec"
Length of output: 34237
modules/farm/keeper/keeper.go (3)
6-7: LGTM: Import paths correctly updated for Cosmos SDK v0.50.x
The import path changes align with the SDK's modular architecture reorganization.
95-95: LGTM: Iterator type correctly updated
The iterator type change to storetypes.KVStorePrefixIterator is consistent with the SDK's new module organization while maintaining the same functionality.
111-111: LGTM: Iterator type correctly updated
The iterator type change to storetypes.KVStorePrefixIterator is consistent with the SDK's new module organization while maintaining the same functionality.
modules/farm/keeper/proposal.go (4)
4-4: LGTM: Import addition aligns with SDK v0.50.x requirements
The addition of storetypes import is necessary for the updated iterator usage and follows the correct import path convention.
41-44: LGTM: Improved error handling for fee pool operations
The changes enhance error handling by:
- Properly checking GetFeePool errors before proceeding
- Directly returning SetFeePool errors instead of ignoring them
This makes the function more robust and reliable.
Also applies to: 60-60
121-121: LGTM: Updated iterator type for SDK v0.50.x compatibility
The change from sdk.KVStorePrefixIterator to storetypes.KVStorePrefixIterator correctly aligns with Cosmos SDK v0.50.x requirements while maintaining proper iterator usage patterns.
41-44: Verify consistent error handling patterns across the module
The improved error handling for fee pool operations has been added to this file. Let's verify that similar patterns are applied consistently across other keeper methods.
Also applies to: 69-72
✅ Verification successful
Error handling is consistently applied for distribution keeper operations
The verification shows that error handling is consistently implemented across all distribution keeper (k.dk) method calls in the module:
- Both instances of
GetFeePoolproperly check and handle errors SetFeePoolis used appropriately after error checks- No other distribution keeper methods are found that would require error handling
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for GetFeePool usage across the module to ensure consistent error handling
rg -A 3 "GetFeePool\(ctx\)" --type go
# Search for other distribution keeper method calls to verify error handling
rg -A 3 "k\.dk\." --type go
Length of output: 1369
modules/farm/keeper/grpc_query.go (1)
7-8: LGTM: Import updates align with cosmos-sdk v0.50.10
The import changes correctly reflect the new package structure in cosmos-sdk v0.50.10, where core components have been moved to dedicated cosmossdk.io packages.
modules/farm/keeper/farmer.go (4)
187-187: LGTM: Correct migration to math package
The change from sdk.ZeroInt() to math.ZeroInt() is appropriate and aligns with the cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 upgrade.
211-211: LGTM: Proper migration to math package
The update to use math.ZeroInt() in the updatePool call is correct and consistent with the cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 upgrade.
224-224: LGTM: Correct migration to math package
The change to math.ZeroInt() for RemainingReward is appropriate and aligns with the cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 upgrade.
Line range hint 1-246: Verify complete migration of numeric operations
Let's verify that all necessary numeric operations have been migrated from the sdk package to the math package.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
All numeric operations in the farm keeper have been properly migrated
The code review shows that all numeric operations in the farm keeper module are already using the math package from Cosmos SDK v0.50.x:
- Uses
math.ZeroInt()for initializing zero values - Uses
math.Intfor amount fields and calculations - No remaining legacy sdk numeric types found in the farm keeper code
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for remaining sdk numeric operations that might need migration
rg -A 1 'sdk\.(Int|Dec|ZeroInt|OneDec|NewInt|NewDec)' --type go
# Search for math package usage to compare
rg -A 1 'math\.(Int|Dec|ZeroInt|OneDec|NewInt|NewDec)' --type go
Length of output: 109006
modules/farm/keeper/msg_server.go (1)
149-149: Verify the impact of non-expedited proposal setting
The addition of false parameter to SubmitProposal indicates this is setting the expedited flag for governance proposals. This change appears to be part of the cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 compatibility update, where proposals can now be marked as expedited or non-expedited.
Setting this to false means community pool farm proposals will follow the standard (non-expedited) governance process. Let's verify this behavior is intentional and consistent.
✅ Verification successful
Setting non-expedited proposal is consistent with codebase implementation
The verification shows that:
- The
expeditedparameter is properly defined in the interface (modules/farm/types/expected_keeper.go) - The implementation in
simapp/types.gocorrectly handles the expedited parameter - The farm module's proposal type is registered and handled through standard governance processes
Setting false for non-expedited proposals is the correct approach as it maintains the standard governance process for community pool farm proposals, which is appropriate for their scope and impact.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of expedited parameter in governance proposals
# across the codebase to ensure consistency
# Check for other SubmitProposal calls and their expedited parameter usage
ast-grep --pattern 'SubmitProposal($$$, $expedited)'
# Check for any governance-related configuration or constants that might
# affect proposal processing
rg -A 3 'ProposalType|VotingPeriod|expedited'
Length of output: 2485
modules/farm/keeper/depinject_test.go (3)
28-30: LGTM: Import changes align with cosmos-sdk v0.50.10
The addition of evidence, feegrant, and upgrade type imports is consistent with the SDK upgrade requirements.
Line range hint 89-259: LGTM: Farm module configuration maintained
The farm module's configuration remains stable through the upgrade, with appropriate integration of new SDK modules in the BeginBlockers and EndBlockers lists. The module permissions and account restrictions are correctly preserved.
Line range hint 62-66: Verify module initialization dependencies
The module order looks correct, but please verify these critical dependencies:
- Farm module's position after its dependent modules
- Genesis module order maintains proper token initialization
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the output and generate additional verification scripts to check module dependencies more thoroughly.
The initial results show BeginBlocker/EndBlocker ordering and InitGenesis patterns, but we need to verify the specific dependencies of the farm module to ensure its position in the initialization sequence is correct. The additional scripts will help us understand the module's dependencies and validate its position in the module order.
Let me analyze the farm module's dependencies more specifically by checking its keeper initialization and bank dependencies.
The initial results show imports and module structure, but we need to verify the specific keeper dependencies to validate the module order. These additional scripts will help us understand the concrete dependencies of the farm module.
Based on the keeper dependencies revealed in the output, I can now verify the module initialization order. The farm module requires:
- Bank Keeper (for coin operations)
- Account Keeper (for module accounts)
- Distribution Keeper (for fee pool operations)
- Gov Keeper (for proposal handling)
- Coinswap Keeper (for LP token validation)
Let me verify if these dependent modules are properly ordered before the farm module in the initialization sequence.
This will help us confirm that all required modules are initialized before the farm module.
Based on the gathered evidence, I can now provide a final verification of the module order:
Module initialization order is correct
The farm module's position in the initialization sequence is properly ordered after all its dependencies:
- auth and bank (for account and coin operations)
- distribution (for fee pool)
- gov (for proposal handling)
- params (for parameter management)
The current order ensures that all required modules (auth, bank, distr, gov, params) are initialized before the farm module, maintaining the correct dependency chain for:
- Module account creation
- Token handling capabilities
- Governance features
- Parameter management
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any explicit module dependencies in the codebase
# Search for BeginBlocker/EndBlocker dependencies
rg -A 3 "BeginBlocker|EndBlocker" --type go
# Search for explicit initialization order requirements
rg -A 3 "InitGenesis" --type go
# Look for any dependency documentation
fd -t f "README.md|DEPENDENCIES.md"
Length of output: 27442
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for module dependencies in farm module and its dependencies
# Search for imports and dependencies in farm module
rg -A 3 "import \(" modules/farm/
rg -A 3 "require \(" modules/farm/
# Check for any explicit dependency documentation in farm module
cat modules/farm/spec/README.md
# Search for any dependency initialization in farm keeper
rg -A 3 "NewKeeper" modules/farm/keeper/
Length of output: 10830
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check farm module's keeper dependencies and bank module interactions
# Check keeper initialization parameters and dependencies
rg -A 10 "NewKeeper" modules/farm/keeper/keeper.go
# Check bank keeper interface requirements
cat modules/farm/types/expected_keeper.go
# Check if farm module depends on any other modules in its operations
rg -A 3 "k\.[A-Z][a-zA-Z]+Keeper\." modules/farm/keeper/
Length of output: 2661
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the order of dependent modules in the initialization sequence
# Get the exact initialization order from the test file
rg -A 10 "InitGenesis: \[\]string{" modules/farm/keeper/depinject_test.go
# Check if there are any other dependencies in the farm module's initialization
rg "ModuleName," modules/farm/keeper/depinject_test.go
Length of output: 2704
modules/farm/keeper/pool.go (3)
114-114: LGTM: Correct transition to math.ZeroInt()
The change from sdk.ZeroInt() to math.ZeroInt() aligns with the cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 upgrade requirements.
141-141: LGTM: Proper usage of math.NewInt for reward calculation
The change to math.NewInt for remaining height calculation is consistent with the cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 upgrade.
Line range hint 192-202: Verify the usage of legacy decimal types
While the changes are correct, the use of math.LegacyZeroDec() suggests we're using legacy decimal types. Consider planning for a future migration to non-legacy decimal types to ensure long-term compatibility.
Let's check the usage of legacy decimal types across the codebase:
modules/farm/keeper/keeper_test.go (4)
18-23: LGTM: Type migration changes look good
The changes correctly migrate from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt for numeric operations and update the context creation to use NewContextLegacy, which aligns with the cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 upgrade.
Also applies to: 59-59
Line range hint 247-298: LGTM: Test cases properly updated for new math types
The test cases for staking, unstaking, and harvesting have been correctly updated to use the new math types from cosmos-sdk v0.50.10, maintaining the test coverage and assertions.
Also applies to: 328-361, 380-444
456-458: LGTM: Helper methods properly updated
The helper methods have been correctly updated to use math.LegacyDec types and NewContextLegacy for context creation, maintaining consistency with the cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 upgrade.
Also applies to: 482-485, 526-528
Line range hint 1-544: Verify test coverage after type migration
The changes look good overall, but it's important to ensure that all test cases still pass after migrating to the new math types and context creation methods.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the output, I can now generate the final response:
Test coverage appears complete and properly maintained after type migration
The test suite shows:
- Comprehensive test coverage with numerous assertions (>50 require/assert statements)
- All test cases are active (no commented out or skipped tests)
- Proper test setup and helper methods
- Thorough validation of math operations after migration to
math.LegacyDec() - Consistent assertions for both positive and negative test cases
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any skipped or pending tests
rg -B 2 -A 2 '(Skip|Pending)\(' modules/farm/keeper/
# Check for any commented out test cases
rg -B 2 -A 2 '^[\t ]*//.*func.*Test' modules/farm/keeper/
Length of output: 114
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check test coverage and patterns more broadly
# Look for test functions and their implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'func \($_\)TestKeeper\($_\)($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Check for any potential test helper functions that might be commented out
rg -B 2 -A 2 '^\s*//.*Test' modules/farm/keeper/
# Look for test assertions to verify test coverage
rg 'suite\.(?:Require|Assert)' modules/farm/keeper/keeper_test.go
# Check for any potential test setup/teardown methods
ast-grep --pattern 'func \($_\) Setup\($_\)($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 3227
modules/farm/module.go (2)
167-167: Update BeginBlock method signature to match Cosmos SDK v0.50.10
The BeginBlock method signature has been updated to accept context.Context and return an error, aligning with the new interface requirements in Cosmos SDK v0.50.10.
185-185: Update RegisterStoreDecoder parameter to simtypes.StoreDecoderRegistry
The parameter type for RegisterStoreDecoder has been updated to simtypes.StoreDecoderRegistry, reflecting changes in the Cosmos SDK v0.50.10. This change is appropriate and aligns with the updated interfaces.
modules/farm/go.mod (1)
27-27: Verify the google.golang.org/grpc dependency for updates and security advisories
The google.golang.org/grpc package is used at version v1.64.1. Ensure that this version is up-to-date and does not contain any known security vulnerabilities. Updating to the latest stable version may provide important bug fixes and security patches.
Run the following script to check for the latest version and any security advisories:
api/irismod/farm/farm.pulsar.go (1)
Line range hint 1-1: Notice: Modifications to Generated Code
The file farm.pulsar.go is generated by protoc-gen-go-pulsar and contains a header comment indicating "DO NOT EDIT". Direct modifications to this file will be overwritten when the code is regenerated. Instead, please make changes to the corresponding .proto files and regenerate the code using the appropriate tools.
modules/farm/types/expected_keeper.go (4)
36-36: Update ValidateLPToken Function Signature
The ValidateLPToken function now accepts context.Context instead of sdk.Context. Ensure that all implementations and calls to ValidateLPToken are updated to reflect this change to avoid inconsistencies and potential runtime issues.
Run the following script to find usages of ValidateLPToken still using sdk.Context:
54-57: Update GovKeeper Methods for Signature Changes
Several methods in the GovKeeper interface have updated signatures:
SubmitProposalnow includes an additionalexpedited boolparameter.GetGovernanceAccountnow acceptscontext.Contextinstead ofsdk.Context.
Please ensure that all implementations and calls to these methods are updated to match the new signatures. Failing to do so may result in compilation errors or unintended behavior.
Run the following script to find and update usages of GovKeeper methods:
40-43: Update AccountKeeper Methods to Use context.Context
The GetAccount and GetModuleAccount methods in the AccountKeeper interface now accept context.Context. Please update all implementations and method calls to use the new context type to ensure seamless integration and prevent compilation errors.
Run the following script to verify updates to AccountKeeper methods:
14-34: Update BankKeeper Methods to Use context.Context
The methods in the BankKeeper interface have been updated to accept context.Context instead of sdk.Context. Ensure that all implementations of this interface and all calls to these methods are updated accordingly to prevent compilation errors and maintain proper context management.
Run the following script to verify that all implementations and usages of BankKeeper methods have been updated:
| @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ package farm | |||
| import ( | |||
| "cosmossdk.io/core/appmodule" | |||
| "cosmossdk.io/depinject" | |||
| storestore "cosmossdk.io/store/types" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Store types import needs updating in two remaining files
The verification revealed inconsistent store types imports across the codebase:
- Files still using old import path:
e2e/sim_test.gomodules/nft/migrations/v2/store_test.go(commented out)
The rest of the codebase, including the farm module, correctly uses the new cosmossdk.io/store/types import path.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify all store type usages across the module
The import path change from github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/store/types to cosmossdk.io/store/types is correct for SDK v0.50.x compatibility.
Let's verify that all store type imports have been updated consistently:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining old store type imports that need updating
rg "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/store/types" --type go
# Search for the new store type import to ensure consistent usage
rg "cosmossdk.io/store/types" --type go
Length of output: 2787
modules/farm/depinject.go
Outdated
|
|
||
| AccountKeeper types.AccountKeeper | ||
| BankKeeper types.BankKeeper | ||
| DistrKeeper types.DistrKeeper | ||
| DistrKeeper types.DistrKeeper `optional:"true"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
DistrKeeper usage requires nil checks when optional
The DistrKeeper is used in the farm module's proposal handling to interact with the fee pool, but there are no nil checks present. Since it's being marked as optional, the following locations need attention:
modules/farm/keeper/proposal.go: Multiple usages ofk.dkwithout nil checks:GetFeePoolandSetFeePoolcalls in fee pool management functionsrefundToFeePoolfunction that handles remaining funds
The code needs to be updated to handle cases where DistrKeeper is nil, either by:
- Adding nil checks before using DistrKeeper methods
- Documenting that certain proposal-related functionality will be unavailable when DistrKeeper is not provided
- Returning appropriate errors when DistrKeeper operations are attempted without the keeper being set
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify nil handling for optional DistrKeeper
Making DistrKeeper optional is a breaking change that requires careful consideration.
Let's verify proper nil handling in the keeper implementation:
Consider documenting:
- The implications of running without a DistrKeeper
- Which features become unavailable
- How the module behaves when DistrKeeper is nil
Let me gather more information about the usage of DistrKeeper in the farm module specifically.
Let me check how the DistrKeeper is used in the farm keeper's methods to understand if there are any potential nil pointer dereferences.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for DistrKeeper usage to ensure proper nil checks
ast-grep --pattern 'DistrKeeper.$$$'
# Look for potential panic conditions
rg -A 5 "DistrKeeper\." --type go
Length of output: 2349
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for DistrKeeper usage in farm module
rg -A 5 "DistrKeeper\." modules/farm/
# Look for nil checks on DistrKeeper
ast-grep --pattern 'if $_.DistrKeeper == nil { $$$ }'
# Search for farm keeper implementation to understand DistrKeeper usage
rg -A 10 "type Keeper struct" modules/farm/
Length of output: 994
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for methods using DistrKeeper in farm module
rg -A 5 "k.dk\." modules/farm/
# Look for method implementations in keeper
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($_ *Keeper) $_($$$) {
$$$
$_.dk.$$$
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1637
| @@ -857,7 +858,7 @@ | |||
| return sdk.NewCoin(pool.TotalLptLocked.Denom, amount), nil | |||
| } | |||
| } | |||
| return sdk.NewCoin(pool.TotalLptLocked.Denom, sdk.ZeroInt()), nil | |||
| return sdk.NewCoin(pool.TotalLptLocked.Denom, math.ZeroInt()), nil | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider explicit error handling in GenStake
The function returns a zero coin when no matching denomination is found, which might mask potential errors.
Consider returning an error instead of a zero coin to make the failure case more explicit:
-return sdk.NewCoin(pool.TotalLptLocked.Denom, math.ZeroInt()), nil
+return sdk.Coin{}, fmt.Errorf("no matching denomination found in spendable coins")📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return sdk.NewCoin(pool.TotalLptLocked.Denom, math.ZeroInt()), nil | |
| return sdk.Coin{}, fmt.Errorf("no matching denomination found in spendable coins") |
| func (am AppModule) EndBlock(ctx context.Context) error { | ||
| EndBlocker(ctx, am.keeper) | ||
| return []abci.ValidatorUpdate{} | ||
| return nil |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure proper context conversion in EndBlock method
The EndBlock method now accepts context.Context, but the EndBlocker function likely expects an sdk.Context. To maintain compatibility, unwrap the context using sdk.UnwrapSDKContext(ctx) before passing it to EndBlocker.
Apply this diff to correct the context handling:
func (am AppModule) EndBlock(ctx context.Context) error {
+ sdkCtx := sdk.UnwrapSDKContext(ctx)
- EndBlocker(ctx, am.keeper)
+ EndBlocker(sdkCtx, am.keeper)
return nil
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func (am AppModule) EndBlock(ctx context.Context) error { | |
| EndBlocker(ctx, am.keeper) | |
| return []abci.ValidatorUpdate{} | |
| return nil | |
| func (am AppModule) EndBlock(ctx context.Context) error { | |
| sdkCtx := sdk.UnwrapSDKContext(ctx) | |
| EndBlocker(sdkCtx, am.keeper) | |
| return nil |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
modules/htlc/genesis_test.go(2 hunks)modules/htlc/migrations/v2/migrate_test.go(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
modules/htlc/migrations/v2/migrate_test.go (1)
13-13: LGTM! Consistent with Cosmos SDK v0.50.x standards
The addition of the math package import aligns with the PR objective of updating to cosmos-sdk v0.50.10, where mathematical operations are moved from the sdk package to the dedicated math package.
modules/htlc/genesis_test.go (1)
13-13: LGTM: Import change aligns with cosmos-sdk v0.50.10 migration
The addition of cosmossdk.io/math import is consistent with the PR objective of upgrading to cosmos-sdk v0.50.10.
Close: #459
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Refactor
Bug Fixes