Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat: support chain/getBlocks #4942

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
May 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

hairtail
Copy link
Contributor

@hairtail hairtail commented May 6, 2024

Summary

This PR adds chain/getBlocks to support get Ironfish blocks in batch.

Testing Plan

To do: add tests.

Documentation

Does this change require any updates to the Iron Fish Docs (ex. the RPC API
Reference
)? If yes, link a
related documentation pull request for the website.

[✓] Yes

Breaking Change

Is this a breaking change? If yes, add notes below on why this is breaking and label it with breaking-change-rpc or breaking-change-sdk.

[ ] Yes

@hairtail hairtail requested a review from a team as a code owner May 6, 2024 16:05
@dguenther dguenther self-requested a review May 6, 2024 17:38
ironfish/src/rpc/routes/chain/getBlocks.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
ironfish/src/rpc/routes/chain/getBlocks.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ironfish/src/rpc/routes/chain/getBlocks.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
ironfish/src/rpc/routes/chain/getBlocks.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@dguenther dguenther requested a review from NullSoldier May 8, 2024 15:22
Copy link
Member

@dguenther dguenther left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will wait for @NullSoldier to take another peek before merging.

@NullSoldier NullSoldier merged commit 6bd255f into iron-fish:staging May 10, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants