Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(rental-agreement): Continue to signing screen #17392

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: rental-agreement-application
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hebaulf
Copy link

@hebaulf hebaulf commented Jan 2, 2025

Alert message to summary

https://app.asana.com/0/1208271027457465/1208557871739584/f

What

  • Add alert message if there are missing elements needed to finish the rental agreement
  • Cleaned up components
  • Other minor updates and fixes

Why

A party to the agreement can choose to proceed with the signing of the agreement from the Summary.

Screenshots / Gifs

Screenshot 2025-01-02 at 16 01 42

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

@hebaulf hebaulf requested a review from a team as a code owner January 2, 2025 16:03
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

🗂️ Base branches to auto review (1)
  • main

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Datadog Report

All test runs fce76d9 🔗

10 Total Test Services: 1 Failed, 9 Passed
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 2 decreased, 21 increased, 176 no change

Test Services
This report shows up to 10 services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api-domains-driving-license 3 0 0 20 0 27.79s 1 no change Link
air-discount-scheme-backend 0 0 0 63 0 16.1s N/A Link
air-discount-scheme-web 0 0 0 2 0 6.6s N/A Link
api 0 0 0 4 0 2.37s N/A Link
api-catalogue-services 0 0 0 23 0 8.96s N/A Link
api-domains-air-discount-scheme 0 0 0 6 0 16.44s N/A Link
api-domains-assets 0 0 0 3 0 9.66s N/A Link
api-domains-auth-admin 0 0 0 18 0 10.23s N/A Link
api-domains-communications 0 0 0 5 0 32.45s N/A Link
api-domains-criminal-record 0 0 0 5 0 8.88s N/A Link

❌ Failed Tests (3)

  • DrivingLicenseService getApplicationEligibility all checks should pass for applicable students - libs/api/domains/driving-license/src/lib/drivingLicense.spec.ts - Details

    Expand for error
     expect(received).toStrictEqual(expected) // deep equality
     
     - Expected  - 1
     + Received  + 1
     
     @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@
           Object {
             "key": "DrivingSchoolMissing",
             "requirementMet": true,
           },
     ...
    
  • DrivingLicenseService getApplicationEligibility all checks should pass for applicable students for temporary license - libs/api/domains/driving-license/src/lib/drivingLicense.spec.ts - Details

    Expand for error
     expect(received).toStrictEqual(expected) // deep equality
     
     - Expected  - 1
     + Received  + 1
     
     @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
       Object {
         "isEligible": true,
         "requirements": Array [
           Object {
     ...
    
  • DrivingLicenseService getApplicationEligibility checks should fail for non-applicable students - libs/api/domains/driving-license/src/lib/drivingLicense.spec.ts - Details

    Expand for error
     expect(received).toStrictEqual(expected) // deep equality
     
     - Expected  - 1
     + Received  + 1
     
     @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@
           Object {
             "key": "DrivingSchoolMissing",
             "requirementMet": false,
           },
     ...
    

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (2)

  • services-user-profile - jest 49.27% (-0.03%) - Details
  • services-auth-delegation-api - jest 50.45% (-0.02%) - Details

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 3, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 35.69%. Comparing base (330c08b) to head (0746c04).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                      Coverage Diff                      @@
##           rental-agreement-application   #17392   +/-   ##
=============================================================
  Coverage                         35.68%   35.69%           
=============================================================
  Files                              6931     6931           
  Lines                            148798   148806    +8     
  Branches                          42511    42513    +2     
=============================================================
+ Hits                              53102    53110    +8     
  Misses                            95696    95696           
Flag Coverage Δ
air-discount-scheme-web 0.00% <ø> (ø)
api 3.33% <ø> (ø)
api-catalogue-services 75.81% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-air-discount-scheme 38.02% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-assets 26.71% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-auth-admin 48.49% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-communications 39.42% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-criminal-record 48.07% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-health-insurance 35.52% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-mortgage-certificate 35.27% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-payment-schedule 42.15% <ø> (ø)
application-api-files 62.06% <ø> (ø)
application-core 75.79% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 38.73% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
application-template-api-modules 27.69% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
application-templates-accident-notification 27.61% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-car-recycling 3.12% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-criminal-record 25.83% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-driving-license 18.15% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-estate 13.66% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-example-payment 24.69% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-financial-aid 14.45% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-general-petition 23.12% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-inheritance-report 6.59% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-marriage-conditions 15.18% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-mortgage-certificate 43.79% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-parental-leave 29.92% <ø> (ø)
application-types 6.45% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-components 1.22% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-shell 22.25% <ø> (ø)
auth-admin-web 2.43% <ø> (ø)
auth-nest-tools 31.52% <ø> (ø)
auth-shared 75.00% <ø> (ø)
clients-charge-fjs-v2 28.88% <ø> (ø)
clients-driving-license 40.95% <ø> (ø)
clients-driving-license-book 43.95% <ø> (ø)
clients-financial-statements-inao 49.74% <ø> (ø)
clients-license-client 1.26% <ø> (ø)
clients-middlewares 73.18% <ø> (+0.24%) ⬆️
clients-regulations 43.04% <ø> (ø)
clients-rsk-company-registry 31.18% <ø> (ø)
clients-rsk-personal-tax-return 38.32% <ø> (ø)
clients-smartsolutions 12.77% <ø> (ø)
clients-syslumenn 49.50% <ø> (ø)
clients-zendesk 50.70% <ø> (ø)
cms 0.39% <ø> (ø)
cms-translations 38.76% <ø> (ø)
content-search-index-manager 95.65% <ø> (ø)
content-search-toolkit 8.16% <ø> (ø)
contentful-apps 4.71% <ø> (ø)
dokobit-signing 62.27% <ø> (ø)
email-service 60.23% <ø> (ø)
feature-flags 90.90% <ø> (ø)
file-storage 46.07% <ø> (ø)
financial-aid-backend 51.43% <ø> (ø)
financial-aid-shared 17.88% <ø> (ø)
icelandic-names-registry-backend 54.33% <ø> (ø)
infra-nest-server 48.06% <ø> (ø)
infra-tracing 69.94% <ø> (ø)
island-ui-core 30.42% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-api 20.20% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-audit-trail 69.10% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-backend 55.97% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-formatters 78.50% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-message 66.66% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-message-handler 48.41% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-scheduler 71.17% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-types 41.60% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-web 27.75% <ø> (ø)
license-api 42.95% <ø> (-0.13%) ⬇️
localization 10.15% <ø> (ø)
logging 58.02% <ø> (ø)
message-queue 67.76% <ø> (+0.70%) ⬆️
nest-audit 65.78% <ø> (ø)
nest-aws 51.93% <ø> (ø)
nest-config 76.51% <ø> (ø)
nest-core 53.16% <ø> (ø)
nest-feature-flags 51.12% <ø> (-0.38%) ⬇️
nest-problem 45.64% <ø> (ø)
nest-sequelize 94.44% <ø> (ø)
nest-swagger 51.13% <ø> (ø)
nova-sms 61.61% <ø> (ø)
portals-admin-regulations-admin 1.80% <ø> (ø)
portals-core 19.58% <ø> (ø)
regulations 16.78% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-admin-api 52.54% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-delegation-api 58.47% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-ids-api 52.57% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
services-auth-public-api 49.42% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
services-sessions 65.33% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️
services-university-gateway 49.59% <ø> (ø)
services-user-notification 46.54% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
services-user-profile 56.89% <ø> (-0.09%) ⬇️
shared-components 29.49% <ø> (ø)
shared-form-fields 33.38% <ø> (ø)
shared-mocking 58.64% <ø> (ø)
shared-pii 92.85% <ø> (ø)
shared-problem 87.50% <ø> (ø)
shared-utils 27.69% <ø> (ø)
skilavottord-ws 24.26% <ø> (ø)
web 2.40% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 4 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 330c08b...0746c04. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant