feat: Added pad to paddle frontend

[AbdullahSabry]

Close #22759

[github-actions]

Thanks for contributing to Ivy! 😊👏
Here are some of the important points from our Contributing Guidelines 📝:
1. Feel free to ignore the run_tests (1), run_tests (2), … jobs, and only look at the display_test_results job. 👀 It contains the following two sections:
- Combined Test Results: This shows the results of all the ivy tests that ran on the PR. ✔️
- New Failures Introduced: This lists the tests that are passing on main, but fail on the PR Fork. Please try to make sure that there are no such tests. 💪
2. The lint / Check formatting / check-formatting tests check for the formatting of your code. 📜 If it fails, please check the exact error message in the logs and fix the same. ⚠️🔧
3. Finally, the test-docstrings / run-docstring-tests check for the changes made in docstrings of the functions. This may be skipped, as well. 📚
Happy coding! 🎉👨‍💻

[AbdullahSabry]

Hey @abdulasiraj

A couple of comments on the PR;

1. The mode symmetric was not implemented yet so it needed to be excluded from testing.
2. In the original paddle function the input fill could receive a size 3 tuple with RGB. However this isn't supported in ivy.fill. Let me know if there's anything to be done to resolve this

Review this and let me know. Thanks!

[abdulasiraj]

Hi @AbdullahSabry,
symmetric mode exists in Ivy functional api as you can see here https://github.com/unifyai/ivy/blob/1da6f0f3580a1e5672fccc1cb7c8e67e65c77b98/ivy/functional/ivy/experimental/manipulation.py#L1048

[AbdullahSabry]

@abdulasiraj

Unfortunately when I run tests I get the error

        if padding_mode == 'edge':
            padding_mode = 'replicate'
        elif padding_mode == 'symmetric':
>           raise ValueError('Do not support symmetric mode')
E           ValueError: Do not support symmetric mode

in all backends. It might not be updated currently

Update: Tested out on the PR and yes it also brings the same error. Reverting changes

[ivy-leaves]

If you are working on an open task, please edit the PR description to link to the issue you've created.

For more information, please check ToDo List Issues Guide.

Thank you 🤗

[abdulasiraj]

yes. you're right there's problem with symmetric mode in functional API.

[shivakumarmahesh]

@AbdullahSabry Hey! I'm working on the other pad function for the NN Common paddle frontend.

I noticed that you initially encountered a failure in the array-api-intelligent-tests-pr / run_tests (pull_request) test, which I'm also experiencing. It appears that you've resolved the issue; could you please share the solution with me?

Thanks in advance.