Exclude fields #274
Exclude fields #274
Conversation
…de that use this method.
…nd 1.6, then I access the attribute fields in _meta
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #274 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 97.54% 97.58% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 13 13
Lines 570 580 +10
Branches 69 72 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 556 566 +10
Misses 7 7
Partials 7 7
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
@gyermolenko @macro1 Hi, I send this PR to replaces the PR #238. |
|
Looks good. It would be great to have this documented as well. Undocumented features can be frustrating both for contributors as well as users of the library. If you don't have time to add the documentation, we'll try to get it added when this is merged in the future. |
|
@macro1 Very good! I will now write the docs for this. |
joaojunior
force-pushed
the
ExcludeAndIncludeFields
branch
from
3ffe151 to
3179eaf
Compare
|
@macro1 I already add the documentation about this. |
|
When is this released? We are really looking forward to it. Cheers for the good work! |
|
@joaojunior would you mind resolving the conflicts? Thank you! |
docs/advanced.rst
Outdated
| Choosing fields to not be stored | ||
| -------------------------------- | ||
|
|
||
| It is possible to use the parameter ``excluded_fields`` to choice which fields |
docs/advanced.rst
Outdated
| question = models.CharField(max_length=200) | ||
| pub_date = models.DateTimeField('date published') | ||
|
|
||
| And you don't want to stored the changes for the field ``pub_date``, it is necessary to update the model to: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
to stored the changes -> to store the changes
Create option to pass fields to not copy in history.
This new PR replaces the PR: #238