Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/client ipnat #74

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 14, 2020
Merged

Feature/client ipnat #74

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 14, 2020

Conversation

jcbf
Copy link
Owner

@jcbf jcbf commented Jul 14, 2020

ClientIPNAT allows IP address translation of the connecting IP
This is particularly useful when you have internal email flows and still have an SPF evaluation

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 14, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #74 into master will decrease coverage by 1.28%.
The diff coverage is 86.48%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #74      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.72%   89.43%   -1.29%     
==========================================
  Files           1        1              
  Lines         550      587      +37     
==========================================
+ Hits          499      525      +26     
- Misses         51       62      +11     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
smf-spf.c 89.43% <86.48%> (-1.29%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6419984...adcdcda. Read the comment docs.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-1.3%) to 89.562% when pulling adcdcda on feature/ClientIPNAT into 6419984 on master.

@jcbf jcbf closed this Jul 14, 2020
@jcbf jcbf reopened this Jul 14, 2020
@jcbf jcbf merged commit c0e06e3 into master Jul 14, 2020
@jcbf jcbf deleted the feature/ClientIPNAT branch July 17, 2020 15:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants