Feature: ChatGPT code review GH Action

[jcrodriguez1989]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Overall, the code appears to be well-structured and clearly commented. However, there are a few potential issues that should be addressed:

1. It is not clear what the purpose of setting "use-public-rspm" to true is in the "setup-r" step. If this setting is necessary, it should be documented or commented.

2. The "extra-packages" field in the "setup-r-dependencies" step should be checked to make sure it includes all of the necessary packages for the code in this project to run successfully.

3. The use of the "sys" function in the "code-review" step may not be platform-independent. It is recommended to use a more platform-independent approach like the "pathlib" module in Python. Additionally, the use of the "fetch origin" command may not always be necessary.

4. It is a good practice to include error handling in the "code-review" step to handle any unexpected errors that may arise during the code review process.

5. Finally, while this may be intentional, it should be noted that the code sends a POST request to the PR comments section and not as a review, as is typically done during code reviews.

Other than the above points, the code appears to be well-written and freeof any obvious issues. However, it is important to keep in mind that a thorough code review involves more than just reviewing the syntax and structure of the code. It also involves testing, security considerations, performance, and design decisions, among other factors. Therefore, it is recommended to perform a more in-depth code review that includes these factors as well.