Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: ci optimize #2692

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 1, 2024
Merged

chore: ci optimize #2692

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 1, 2024

Conversation

Alex-huxiyang
Copy link
Collaborator

@Alex-huxiyang Alex-huxiyang commented Nov 1, 2024

🤔 这个变动的性质是?

  • 新特性提交
  • 日常 bug 修复
  • 站点、文档改进
  • 演示代码改进
  • 组件样式/交互改进
  • TypeScript 定义更新
  • 包体积优化
  • 性能优化
  • 功能增强
  • 国际化改进
  • 重构
  • 代码风格优化
  • 测试用例
  • 分支合并
  • 其他改动(是关于什么的改动?)

🔗 相关 Issue

💡 需求背景和解决方案

☑️ 请求合并前的自查清单

⚠️ 请自检并全部勾选全部选项⚠️

  • 文档已补充或无须补充
  • 代码演示已提供或无须提供
  • TypeScript 定义已补充或无须补充
  • fork仓库代码是否为最新避免文件冲突
  • Files changed 没有 package.json lock 等无关文件

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 文档
    • 更新了工作流配置,简化了标签添加的条件逻辑。
    • 移除了对 pull_request 触发器的支持,影响了某些分支的处理。
    • 删除了工作流的权限声明。

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@pull-request-size[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 24 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 09997fd and 67bc92d.

Walkthrough

在此拉取请求中,对.github/workflows/ci.yml文件的工作流配置进行了多项修改。移除了针对nextV3.0分支的pull_request触发器,同时简化了pull_request_target触发器下添加标签的条件。此外,完全移除了permissions部分,可能会影响工作流的权限设置。工作流中的各个作业(如add-labellinttestbuild)结构和步骤保持不变,继续在ubuntu-latest上运行。

Changes

文件路径 变更摘要
.github/workflows/ci.yml 移除了针对nextV3.0pull_request触发器;更新了add-label作业中的条件;移除了permissions部分。

Possibly related PRs

  • chore: ci #2678: 此PR修改了.github/workflows/ci.yml中的CI工作流,包括移除workflow_dispatch触发器和调整缩进,与主PR中的CI工作流配置更改相关。
  • chore: ci auto branch label 【support current repo】 #2687: 此PR在CI工作流中引入了一个新的自动分支标记作业,与主PR中关于CI工作流触发器和标签条件的修改相关。
  • chore: ci #2690: 此PR更新了CI工作流配置,包括添加新触发器和更改标签处理,直接与主PR中关于pull_request_target触发器和标签分配逻辑的更改相关。

Suggested labels

size/S

Suggested reviewers

  • oasis-cloud

🐰 在草地上跳跃,工作流新变化,
标签更简单,权限已无牵挂。
CI如风般顺畅,构建无忧无虑,
兔子欢呼雀跃,代码更美如画! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the 2.x label Nov 1, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.07%. Comparing base (53571d1) to head (67bc92d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on next.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             next    #2692      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.04%   84.07%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         217      217              
  Lines       17830    17830              
  Branches     2605     2608       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits        14985    14991       +6     
+ Misses       2840     2834       -6     
  Partials        5        5              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (3)

Line range hint 1-11: 建议添加明确的权限声明以增强安全性

工作流程中移除了 permissions 声明,这可能导致工作流获得过大的权限范围。建议添加明确的最小权限声明。

建议添加以下配置:

name: CI

on:
  push:
    branches:
      - next
      - V3.0
  pull_request_target:
    types: [opened, synchronize, reopened]
  workflow_dispatch:

+permissions:
+  contents: read
+  pull-requests: write

Line range hint 13-38: 建议优化标签处理逻辑

当前的标签处理逻辑可以进一步优化,建议:

  1. 使用 actions/github-script 替代 shell 脚本处理标签逻辑
  2. 添加错误处理机制

建议重构为:

- name: Process labels
  uses: actions/github-script@v6
  with:
    script: |
      const base = context.payload.pull_request?.base?.ref;
      let label = '';
      
      if (base === 'next') {
        label = '2.x';
      } else if (base === 'V3.0') {
        label = '3.x';
      }
      
      if (label) {
        try {
          await github.rest.issues.addLabels({
            owner: context.repo.owner,
            repo: context.repo.repo,
            issue_number: context.payload.pull_request.number,
            labels: [label]
          });
        } catch (error) {
          core.warning(`Failed to add label: ${error.message}`);
        }
      }

Line range hint 89-91: 建议为 Codecov 上传添加重试机制

为了提高 CI 的稳定性,建议为 Codecov 上传添加重试机制。

建议添加重试配置:

      - name: Upload coverage reports to Codecov
        if: ${{ always() }}
        uses: codecov/codecov-action@v4
+       with:
+         fail_ci_if_error: false
+         retry_on_error: true
        env:
          CODECOV_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 53571d1 and 09997fd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)

@@ -36,7 +30,7 @@ jobs:
fi

- name: Add label to Pull Request
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request_target' && env.label != ''
if: env.label != ''
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

使用 pull_request_target 时需要增加额外的安全检查

当前标签添加的条件过于宽松。使用 pull_request_target 时,应该添加更严格的条件检查,以防止潜在的安全风险。

建议修改条件判断:

-if: env.label != ''
+if: github.event_name == 'pull_request_target' && env.label != '' && github.event.pull_request.base.repo.full_name == github.repository
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if: env.label != ''
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request_target' && env.label != '' && github.event.pull_request.base.repo.full_name == github.repository

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants