docs: update cookbook #3718
docs: update cookbook #3718
Conversation
hverlin
commented
Dec 19, 2024
•
hverlin
commented
- Collect ideas from Request for cookbook contributions #3645
- Move example templates to separate sections in the cookbook
hverlin
force-pushed
the
hv/cookbooks
branch
from
20676c2 to
5e9aee6
Compare
|
CC @syhol in case you have other suggestions. Otherwise, we can make create additional PRs maybe |
| ''' | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ## Example with `pnpm` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Personally I don't use camelCase in my task names. You could use either:
[tasks."pnpm:install"][tasks.pnpm-install]
I don't feel strongly about it though, so just a suggestion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Agree that it will be nicer. I will update to pnpm-install
| root@75f179a190a1:/mise# echo "" >/mise/config.toml | ||
| root@75f179a190a1:/mise# mise prune --yes | ||
| mise pruned configuration links | ||
| mise python@3.13.1 ✓ remove /mise/cache/python/3.13.1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Might be worth putting a little comment above this, mentioning that we overwrite and prune because jdx/mise docker image comes with python installed.
root@75f179a190a1:/mise# # overwrite config to give us a clean state| node = '22' | ||
|
|
||
| [hooks] | ||
| post_install = 'corepack enable' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Personally I think directly installing pnpm with mise is a nicer experience, but we have had a few people ask how to use corepack with mise.
Also corepack won't be built into newer versions of nodejs by default. It's worth thinking a bit more about this one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, I could show both. I like corepack more since it's installed the exact version which is in the package.json (pnpm will do it in v10, but this avoids installing pnpm twice)
I can replace it with npx corepack enable to future-proof it 👍
