Add parser categories

[uhafner]

The plugin started with warnings only, but now we can scan for warnings, bugs, vulnerabilities, etc. It makes sense to categorize all parsers so we can automatically set icons and texts for the selected parser.

[github-actions]

☀️   Quality Monitor

   🚦   Tests: 100 % successful (✔️ 1289 passed, 🙈 2 skipped)
   〰️   Line Coverage: 94% (421 missed lines)
   ➰   Branch Coverage: 87% (264 missed branches)
     CheckStyle: No warnings
     PMD: No warnings
     SpotBugs: No warnings
   🐛   Error Prone: No warnings

Created by Quality Monitor v1.9.0 (#00b9b1a). More details are shown in the GitHub Checks Result.

[github-actions]

☀️   Quality Monitor

   🚦   Tests: 100 % successful (✔️ 1289 passed, 🙈 2 skipped)
   〰️   Line Coverage: 94% (426 missed lines)
   ➰   Branch Coverage: 87% (264 missed branches)
     CheckStyle: No warnings
     PMD: No warnings
     SpotBugs: No warnings
   🐛   Error Prone: 1 warning (0 error, 0 high, 1 normal, 0 low)

Created by Quality Monitor v1.10.0 (#9c48d50). More details are shown in the GitHub Checks Result.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.58%. Comparing base (234c415) to head (a4b2f36).
Report is 26 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #1095      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     90.55%   90.58%   +0.02%     
- Complexity     2311     2323      +12     
============================================
  Files           357      357              
  Lines          6566     6583      +17     
  Branches        676      676              
============================================
+ Hits           5946     5963      +17     
  Misses          417      417              
  Partials        203      203              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

☀️   Quality Monitor

   🚦   Tests: 100 % successful (✔️ 1290 passed, 🙈 2 skipped)
   〰️   Line Coverage: 94% (417 missed lines)
   ➰   Branch Coverage: 87% (264 missed branches)
     CheckStyle: No warnings
     PMD: No warnings
     SpotBugs: No warnings
   🐛   Error Prone: 1 warning (0 error, 0 high, 1 normal, 0 low)
     OWASP Dependency Check: 1 warning (0 error, 0 high, 1 normal, 0 low)

Created by Quality Monitor v1.10.0 (#9c48d50). More details are shown in the GitHub Checks Result.

[github-actions]

☀️   Quality Monitor

   🚦   Tests: 100 % successful (✔️ 1290 passed, 🙈 2 skipped)
   〰️   Line Coverage: 94% (417 missed lines)
   ➰   Branch Coverage: 87% (264 missed branches)
     CheckStyle: No warnings
     PMD: No warnings
     SpotBugs: No warnings
   🐛   Error Prone: 4 warnings (0 error, 0 high, 4 normal, 0 low)
     OWASP Dependency Check: 1 warning (0 error, 0 high, 1 normal, 0 low)

Created by Quality Monitor v1.10.0 (#9c48d50). More details are shown in the GitHub Checks Result.

[github-actions]

☀️   Quality Monitor

   🚦   Tests: 100 % successful (✔️ 1290 passed, 🙈 2 skipped)
   〰️   Line Coverage: 94% (417 missed lines)
   ➰   Branch Coverage: 87% (264 missed branches)
     CheckStyle: No warnings
     PMD: No warnings
     SpotBugs: No warnings
   🐛   Error Prone: No warnings
     OWASP Dependency Check: 1 warning (0 error, 0 high, 1 normal, 0 low)

Created by Quality Monitor v1.10.0 (#9c48d50). More details are shown in the GitHub Checks Result.