feat(TarArchive) added support empty dir in tarArchive

[lifefire1]

See JENKINS-73837.

Description of changes

Changes were made to the classes to enable reading of empty directories. An error in the core module has been fixed.

Testing done

The changes were tested as follows:

• All existing tests were run and passed successfully.
• Manual testing was conducted on reading empty directories.

Proposed changelog entries

• Fixed an error in the core module and added support for reading empty directories.

Proposed upgrade guidelines

N/A

Submitter checklist

Beta Give feedback

1. The Jira issue, if it exists, is well-described.
2. The changelog entries and upgrade guidelines are appropriate for the audience affected by the change (users or developers, depending on the change) and are in the imperative mood (see examples). Fill in the Proposed upgrade guidelines section only if there are breaking changes or changes that may require extra steps from users during upgrade.
3. There is automated testing or an explanation as to why this change has no tests.
4. New public classes, fields, and methods are annotated with @Restricted or have @since TODO Javadocs, as appropriate.
5. New deprecations are annotated with @Deprecated(since = "TODO") or @Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "TODO"), if applicable.
6. New or substantially changed JavaScript is not defined inline and does not call eval to ease future introduction of Content Security Policy (CSP) directives (see documentation).
7. For dependency updates, there are links to external changelogs and, if possible, full differentials.
8. For new APIs and extension points, there is a link to at least one consumer.

Desired reviewers

@mention

Before the changes are marked as ready-for-merge:

Maintainer checklist

Beta Give feedback

1. There are at least two (2) approvals for the pull request and no outstanding requests for change.
2. Conversations in the pull request are over, or it is explicit that a reviewer is not blocking the change.
3. Changelog entries in the pull request title and/or Proposed changelog entries are accurate, human-readable, and in the imperative mood.
4. Proper changelog labels are set so that the changelog can be generated automatically.
5. If the change needs additional upgrade steps from users, the upgrade-guide-needed label is set and there is a Proposed upgrade guidelines section in the pull request title (see example).
6. If it would make sense to backport the change to LTS, a Jira issue must exist, be a Bug or Improvement, and be labeled as lts-candidate to be considered (see query).

[lifefire1]

hi, I'm new here. Could you tell me what the problem is? I ran my tests locally and everything completed successfully.

[daniel-beck]

How does this compare to #9836?

[daniel-beck]

Re the build failures, Spotless (code formatter) is unhappy. Run mvn spotless:apply and commit the result. Generally, mvn clean install -DskipTests is useful to run before pushing, as that skips the very long tests, but will run the static checks.

[DerSimeon]

I recommend closing this in favour of #9836 - there is already a more complete implementation of the Issue.