Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added new when conditions stashed and archived #353

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rsandell
Copy link
Member

@rsandell rsandell commented Sep 4, 2019

  • JENKINS issue(s):
    • N/A
  • Description:
    • Two new when conditions to be able to check if a previous stage stashed or archived something.
  • Documentation changes:
    I was originally planning to add these to the declarative-pipeline-when-conditions-plugin since these conditions might be a bit niche. But after an hour of fixing "require upper bounds" issues in the pom I found out that the API for allowing other plugins to contribute when conditions wasn't "fixed" yet.
  • Users/aliases to notify:

When condition for checking
if something is stashed by earlier stages
Also fixed a directive generator bug
in both stashed and archived when the
advanced section got expanded the comparator got filled in.
@rsandell rsandell requested a review from abayer September 4, 2019 16:25
@rsandell
Copy link
Member Author

rsandell commented Sep 5, 2019

Tickling the PR builder.

@rsandell rsandell closed this Sep 5, 2019
@rsandell rsandell reopened this Sep 5, 2019
@rsandell
Copy link
Member Author

@bitwiseman ping?

@bitwiseman
Copy link
Contributor

@rsandell Sorry, distracted by other work. Looks like this still needs to pass CI. Trying again.

@bitwiseman bitwiseman closed this Oct 26, 2019
@bitwiseman bitwiseman reopened this Oct 26, 2019
@bitwiseman bitwiseman closed this Oct 26, 2019
@bitwiseman bitwiseman reopened this Oct 26, 2019
@bitwiseman bitwiseman closed this Nov 1, 2019
@bitwiseman bitwiseman reopened this Nov 1, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@bitwiseman bitwiseman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rsandell Looks good to me. Still need to do the documentation, right?

@rsandell
Copy link
Member Author

Docs, right :)
It was a long time since I did this so need to find some time to brush up on it.

@bitwiseman
Copy link
Contributor

@rsandell Do you have time to do docs for this, or would you like me to pick this up?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants