-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert "fix(expect): objectContaining
should recurse into sub-objects (#10508)"
#10766
Conversation
…stjs#10711)" This reverts commit f84a807.
…ts (jestjs#10508)" This reverts commit 9a07781.
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ | |||
- `[babel-plugin-jest-hoist]` Preserve order of hoisted mock nodes within containing block ([#10536](https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/10536)) | |||
- `[babel-plugin-jest-hoist]` Hoist pure constants to support experimental JSX transform in hoisted mocks ([#10723](https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/10723)) | |||
- `[babel-preset-jest]` Update `babel-preset-current-node-syntax` to support top level await ([#10747](https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/10747)) | |||
- `[expect]` Stop modifying the sample in `expect.objectContaining()` ([#10711](https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/10711)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
never released, so I just removed it. Keeping the test, tho 👍
@@ -93,7 +93,14 @@ describe('caller option correctly merges from defaults and options', () => { | |||
|
|||
expect(loadPartialConfig).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); | |||
expect(loadPartialConfig).toHaveBeenCalledWith( | |||
expect.objectContaining({caller: {name: 'babel-jest', ...output}}), | |||
expect.objectContaining({ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good example of the use case of expect.objectContaining
current behavior - I only care about a subset of the properties, but I care about all of their properties
should probably add a test
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added here: cda33c9
(#10766)
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Summary
Fixes #10716
Test plan
Green CI. Kept some of the tests added later for the mutation regression