Add 2.9.0 changelog. Fixes #949 #967
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
benvdh
changed the title
benvdh
force-pushed
the
add-2.9.0-changelog
branch
from
6793571 to
17f959a
Compare
auvipy
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2024
samuelogboyetoluconsulting
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2024
|
@jpadilla There are now 2 approving reviews, and thereby this PR meets all requirements to get merged. When do you expect this can be merged and released? If there's anything else I can do, just let me know. I'd love to help to get this done. |
@jpadilla Thx! For the review and merge. Can you approve the flow here, and add the release? https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/actions/runs/10180388114 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR:
I noticed PR #910 apart from adding support for Python 3.12, also drops support for python 3.7 which might be considered as a backwards incompatible change. So not sure if you want to go 3.0 for that (instead of 2.9.0), or since none of of our own APIs break we stick with 2.9.0.
@jpadilla or @auvipy It would be great if you could review and release the next version of PyJWT...
Fixes #949.