Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify that the custom serializers are given the widget instance as a second argument, not the widget manager. #1355

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2017

Conversation

jasongrout
Copy link
Member

We had not been calling the static _serialize_state method, and there was ambiguity with what the second argument was.

This incorporates the last part of #1300.

…a second argument, not the widget manager.

We had not been calling the static _serialize_state method, and there was ambiguity with what the second argument was.

This incorporates the last part of jupyter-widgets#1300.
@jasongrout jasongrout added this to the 7.0 milestone May 17, 2017
@jasongrout jasongrout merged commit f771561 into jupyter-widgets:master May 17, 2017
@jasongrout jasongrout deleted the serializercleanup branch May 18, 2017 13:30
@github-actions github-actions bot added the resolved-locked Closed issues are locked after 30 days inactivity. Please open a new issue for related discussion. label Feb 14, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 14, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
resolved-locked Closed issues are locked after 30 days inactivity. Please open a new issue for related discussion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant