Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

binderhub: 0.2.0-049.8a0cee8...0.2.0-059.78bfbcd #1306

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 17, 2019
Merged

binderhub: 0.2.0-049.8a0cee8...0.2.0-059.78bfbcd #1306

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 17, 2019

Conversation

henchbot
Copy link
Contributor

@henchbot henchbot commented Dec 11, 2019

This is a binderhub version bump. See the link below for a diff of new changes:

jupyterhub/binderhub@8a0cee8...78bfbcd

Associated PRs:

  • [MRG]: badge_base_url can be a function that gets the parameter from the HTTP RequestHandler #1031
  • reduce configuration of authentication with named servers #1026
  • use jupyterhub-0.9.0-alpha.1.088.1350ad7 #1028
  • Add Dataverse to UI. Fixes testing kubectl logs #900 #969

@henchbot henchbot changed the title binderhub: 0.2.0-049.8a0cee8...0.2.0-051.99305a6 binderhub: 0.2.0-049.8a0cee8...0.2.0-056.8c51534 Dec 12, 2019
@henchbot henchbot changed the title binderhub: 0.2.0-049.8a0cee8...0.2.0-056.8c51534 binderhub: 0.2.0-049.8a0cee8...0.2.0-059.78bfbcd Dec 17, 2019
@bitnik
Copy link
Contributor

bitnik commented Dec 17, 2019

Associated PRs are actually these ones:

  • [MRG]: badge_base_url can be a function that gets the parameter from the HTTP RequestHandler #1031
  • reduce configuration of authentication with named servers #1026
  • use jupyterhub-0.9.0-alpha.1.088.1350ad7 #1028

and I think we can merge this. What do you think @choldgraf @manics @consideRatio ?

@consideRatio
Copy link
Member

Regarding use jupyterhub-0.9.0-alpha.1.088.1350ad7 #1028 I feel confident, I lack time to evaluate the others.

@choldgraf
Copy link
Member

I think the others are good to go as well, they shouldn't affect most binderhubs anyway I believe. So I'm +1 on merging if @manics and @bitnik are.

We should probably slow down the henchbot merged over the next couple of weeks though as we'll have lower dev capacity than normal. What do folks think?

Copy link
Member

@manics manics left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@choldgraf choldgraf merged commit 191a6bb into jupyterhub:master Dec 17, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

testing kubectl logs
5 participants