Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Terminals availability is not the responsibility of JupyterLab #330

Conversation

fcollonval
Copy link
Member

The settings terminals_available is set either by jupyter-server v1, jupyter-server-terminals or notebook v6. It is not the responsibility of JupyterLab.

@fcollonval fcollonval added the bug label Oct 31, 2022
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 31, 2022

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.11%. Comparing base (904bd95) to head (dd3f00f).
Report is 120 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #330      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   65.17%   65.11%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          22       22              
  Lines        1743     1740       -3     
  Branches      331      331              
==========================================
- Hits         1136     1133       -3     
  Misses        522      522              
  Partials       85       85              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fcollonval fcollonval changed the title Terminals availability is not the responsability of JupyterLab Terminals availability is not the responsibility of JupyterLab Oct 31, 2022
@fcollonval fcollonval merged commit dbf016f into jupyterlab:main Oct 31, 2022
@fcollonval fcollonval deleted the fix/terminals-availability-is-set-externally branch October 31, 2022 12:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants