-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement smarter merge #55
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -25,22 +25,23 @@ def normalize_keys(spec) | |
# Also this needs to be aware of OpenAPI details unlike an ordinary deep_reverse_merge | ||
# because a Hash-like structure may be an array whose Hash elements have a key name. | ||
# | ||
# TODO: Perform more intelligent merges like rerouting edits / merging types | ||
# TODO: Should we probably force-merge `summary` regardless of manual modifications? | ||
def deep_reverse_merge!(base, spec) | ||
spec.each do |key, value| | ||
if base[key].is_a?(Hash) && value.is_a?(Hash) | ||
deep_reverse_merge!(base[key], value) | ||
elsif !base.key?(key) | ||
base[key] = value | ||
if !base[key].key?("$ref") | ||
deep_reverse_merge!(base[key], value) | ||
end | ||
elsif base[key].is_a?(Array) && value.is_a?(Array) | ||
# parameters need to be merged as if `name` and `in` were the Hash keys. | ||
if key == 'parameters' | ||
base[key] |= value | ||
base[key].uniq! { |param| param.slice('name', 'in') } | ||
else | ||
base[key] = value | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I wondered if just overwriting the value of |
||
end | ||
else | ||
# no-op | ||
base[key] = value | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Similar to https://github.com/k0kubun/rspec-openapi/pull/55/files#r877575816, as long as it updates only fields that rspec-openapi generates, it's probably fine, I guess. |
||
end | ||
end | ||
base | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"openapi": "3.0.3", | ||
"info": { | ||
"title": "My API", | ||
"version": "1.0.0" | ||
}, | ||
"servers": [], | ||
"paths": { | ||
"/tables": { | ||
"get": { | ||
"summary": "index", | ||
"tags": [ | ||
"Table" | ||
], | ||
"parameters": [ | ||
{ | ||
"name": "id", | ||
"in": "path", | ||
"required": true, | ||
"schema": { | ||
"type": "integer" | ||
}, | ||
"example": 1 | ||
} | ||
], | ||
"responses": { | ||
"200": { | ||
"description": "foo", | ||
"content": { | ||
"application/json": { | ||
"schema": { | ||
"$ref": "#/components/schemas/Table" | ||
}, | ||
"example": [ | ||
{ | ||
"id": 1, | ||
"name": "THIS SHOULD BE UPDATED" | ||
} | ||
] | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"parameters": [] | ||
} | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"components": { | ||
"schemas": { | ||
"Table": { | ||
"type": "object", | ||
"properties": { | ||
"id": { | ||
"type": "integer", | ||
"format": "int64" | ||
}, | ||
"name": { | ||
"type": "string" | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"openapi": "3.0.3", | ||
"info": { | ||
"title": "My API", | ||
"version": "1.0.0" | ||
}, | ||
"servers": [], | ||
"paths": { | ||
"/tables": { | ||
"get": { | ||
"summary": "index", | ||
"tags": [ | ||
"Table" | ||
], | ||
"parameters": [ | ||
{ | ||
"name": "foo_id", | ||
"in": "path", | ||
"required": true, | ||
"schema": { | ||
"type": "integer" | ||
}, | ||
"example": 9999 | ||
} | ||
], | ||
"responses": { | ||
"200": { | ||
"description": "foo", | ||
"content": { | ||
"application/json": { | ||
"schema": { | ||
"$ref": "#/components/schemas/Table" | ||
}, | ||
"example": [ | ||
{ | ||
"id": 9999, | ||
"name": "UPDATED" | ||
} | ||
] | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"components": { | ||
"schemas": { | ||
"Table": { | ||
"type": "object", | ||
"properties": { | ||
"id": { | ||
"type": "integer", | ||
"format": "int64" | ||
}, | ||
"name": { | ||
"type": "string" | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"paths": { | ||
"/tables": { | ||
"get": { | ||
"summary": "index", | ||
"tags": [ | ||
"Table" | ||
], | ||
"parameters": [ | ||
{ | ||
"name": "foo_id", | ||
"in": "path", | ||
"required": true, | ||
"schema": { | ||
"type": "integer" | ||
}, | ||
"example": 9999 | ||
} | ||
], | ||
"responses": { | ||
"200": { | ||
"description": "foo", | ||
"content": { | ||
"application/json": { | ||
"schema": { | ||
"type": "object", | ||
"properties": { | ||
"id": { | ||
"type": "integer" | ||
}, | ||
"name": { | ||
"type": "string" | ||
} | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"example": [ | ||
{ | ||
"id": 9999, | ||
"name": "UPDATED" | ||
} | ||
] | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ | ||
require 'spec_helper' | ||
require 'json' | ||
require "rspec/openapi/schema_merger" | ||
|
||
RSpec.describe "SchemaMerger" do | ||
include SpecHelper | ||
|
||
let(:base_path) do | ||
File.expand_path('spec/rspec/schema_merger/base.json', repo_root) | ||
end | ||
|
||
let(:input_path) do | ||
File.expand_path('spec/rspec/schema_merger/input.json', repo_root) | ||
end | ||
|
||
let(:expected_path) do | ||
File.expand_path('spec/rspec/schema_merger/expected.json', repo_root) | ||
end | ||
|
||
it "overwrite the supported key, but leaves the unsupported keys" do | ||
base_json = JSON.load(File.read(base_path)) | ||
input_json = JSON.load(File.read(input_path)) | ||
res = RSpec::OpenAPI::SchemaMerger.reverse_merge!(base_json, input_json) | ||
expected_json = JSON.load(File.read(expected_path)) | ||
expect(res).to eq(expected_json) | ||
end | ||
end |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a special treatment to avoid merging anything to Reference Object.
The reference object can have only
$ref
field.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this for the case that
$ref
is manually added to an OpenAPI schema file? If you manually maintain the schema of the response, why don't you skip updating OpenAPI from such test cases? Do you have a test case that calls multiple endpoints and want to update OpenAPI for only one of these?