[Feature]: Add integrations support in the operator

[arbreezy]

Checklist

• I've searched for similar issues and couldn't find anything matching
• I've discussed this feature request in the K8sGPT Slack and got positive feedback

Is this feature request related to a problem?

No

Problem Description

Feature parity with K8sGPT current implementation:

More specifically, the operator at the moment doesn't support the integrations feature (trivy).

Recently we introduced in k8sgpt cli a no-install subfeature in the integrations which effectively won't install Trivy.

Solution Description

K8sGPT CR will have a new integrations section to support this feature which will not install integrations but assume they are already installed
e.g trivy operator is already deployed to a K8s cluster that K8sGPT operator is running

example CR:

...  
integrations:
  trivy:
    enabled: true
...

Benefits

Feature parity with K8sGPT and ability to extend integrations support in the future

Potential Drawbacks

No response

Additional Information

No response

[eyal-sofer]

please assign me

[wujunwei]

If no one has started solving it yet, I will finish it by next Monday.
maybe, need some changes in project k8sgpt-ai/k8sgpt or, we can install helm chart in k8sgpt-operator itself.

[wujunwei]

I find three ways to Implement this：

1. need some changes in project k8sgpt-ai/k8sgpt add env or config to install trivy when server start.
2. we can install helm chart in k8sgpt-operator directly and set active_filters in server's config file in a init container.
3. Do it by grpc client , add new method active filter.

[arbreezy]

hey @wujunwei ,

firstly, I can assign it to you if you want and thanks for showing interest in the project !
re: 2. I believe is better to not install anything directly to the cluster from the operator and assume trivy is already running, maybe a check if operator can find trivy's workload in a cluster.

Installing or not, integration charts like trivy, GRPC new methods will be required to interact with K8sGPT integrations handler

[AlexsJones]

We are very close to this being possible now configuration API has been merged in

#201

[AlexsJones]

This is a WIP #225