Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: reach MVP milestone #49

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2022
Merged

docs: reach MVP milestone #49

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2022

Conversation

maiqueb
Copy link
Collaborator

@maiqueb maiqueb commented Oct 26, 2022

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR updates the documentation indicating the project has reached what I consider to be the MVP.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer (optional):

README.md Outdated

## Known limitations
- the networks being hot-plugged **must** feature the `name` attribute in the `spec.config`. This is tracked in this [issue](https://github.com/maiqueb/multus-dynamic-networks-controller/issues/45).
- the pod controller is not level driven. This is tracked in this [RFE](https://github.com/maiqueb/multus-dynamic-networks-controller/issues/48).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is "level driven" a well known (kubernetes) lingo?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm. No. This predates all that; its a term from circuits - edge trigger vs level trigger.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh you are such a nerd! I'm familiar with edge vs level there, but I would never make the connection in this README

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does the provided stack overflow answer help ? ...

I am open to any other suggestions @phoracek

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

perhaps "hot-plug requests done while the controller was offline won't be acted upon (or reconciled) once the controller comes back online"?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

whoops. /me facepalms

@@ -151,3 +151,7 @@ Below you can find information on how to push local code changes to a kind clust
- push image to local registry: `podman push localhost:5000/maiqueb/multus-dynamic-networks-controller`
- update manifests to use the generated image: `IMAGE_REGISTRY=localhost:5000/maiqueb make manifests`
- deploy the controller: `kubectl apply -f manifests/dynamic-networks-controller.yaml`

## Known limitations
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So we allow hot-unplug of cold-plugged (?) interfaces?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Currently ? Yes.

Do we want to ?... Not sure.

I'm inclined to say no.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ack

@@ -151,3 +151,7 @@ Below you can find information on how to push local code changes to a kind clust
- push image to local registry: `podman push localhost:5000/maiqueb/multus-dynamic-networks-controller`
- update manifests to use the generated image: `IMAGE_REGISTRY=localhost:5000/maiqueb make manifests`
- deploy the controller: `kubectl apply -f manifests/dynamic-networks-controller.yaml`

## Known limitations
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we mention device plugin based CNIs? And that requested network resources must be available on the node, we won't reschedule if they are not

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure.

But I do not plan on supporting that for the near future.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Duarte Barroso <mdbarroso@redhat.com>
Copy link
Member

@phoracek phoracek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@maiqueb maiqueb merged commit f9a3c88 into main Oct 26, 2022
@maiqueb maiqueb deleted the mvp-readme branch October 26, 2022 14:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants