Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define top level Permission for ci-schedule workflow #5069

Merged

Conversation

aditya7302
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of #5048

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Jun 20, 2024
@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 20, 2024
@aditya7302
Copy link
Contributor Author

Here is the link of the CI Schedule Workflow(ci-schedule.yml) run with modified permissions :
https://github.com/aditya7302/karmada/actions/runs/9614970779

@zhzhuang-zju
Copy link
Contributor

Here is the link of the CI Schedule Workflow(ci-schedule.yml) run with modified permissions : https://github.com/aditya7302/karmada/actions/runs/9614970779

@aditya7302 refer to https://github.com/aditya7302/karmada/actions/runs/9614970779/workflow, there seems be no restriction on the permissions of ci

@aditya7302
Copy link
Contributor Author

@zhzhuang-zju I am sorry It was mistake I didn't notice I will provide you with another link of the local run with permissions added.

@aditya7302
Copy link
Contributor Author

@zhzhuang-zju here is the updated link of the workflow run with added permissions : https://github.com/aditya7302/karmada/actions/runs/9660518622/workflow

@zhzhuang-zju
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
cc @RainbowMango

@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 25, 2024
@@ -3,6 +3,10 @@ on:
schedule:
# Run this workflow "At 18:00 UTC on Sunday and Saturday"
- cron: '0 18 * * 0,6'

permissions:
actions: write # Required for dynamic workflow control, enabling retrying of job steps in case of failure (actions: nick-fields/retry@v3.0.0).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aditya7302 Whether write permission is required for action nick-fields/retry ? Refer to https://github.com/zhzhuang-zju/karmada/actions/runs/9758042445/job/26931766980, when I verify locally, I can enable retrying of job steps without write permission.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zhzhuang-zju after using the StepSecurity's online tool for this workflow.
The following was the output

name: FOSSA
on:
  push:
    # Exclude branches created by Dependabot to avoid triggering current workflow
    # for PRs initiated by Dependabot.
    branches-ignore:
      - 'dependabot/**'
permissions:  # added using https://github.com/step-security/secure-repo
  contents: read

jobs:
  fossa:
    name: FOSSA
    # prevent job running from forked repository, otherwise
    # 1. running on the forked repository would fail as missing necessary secret.
    # 2. running on the forked repository would use unnecessary GitHub Action time.
    if: ${{ github.repository == 'karmada-io/karmada' }}
    runs-on: ubuntu-22.04
    steps:
      - name: Harden Runner
        uses: step-security/harden-runner@17d0e2bd7d51742c71671bd19fa12bdc9d40a3d6 # v2.8.1
        with:
          egress-policy: audit

      - name: checkout code
        uses: actions/checkout@692973e3d937129bcbf40652eb9f2f61becf3332 # v4.1.7
      - name: Run FOSSA scan and upload build data
        uses: fossas/fossa-action@f61a4c0c263690f2ddb54b9822a719c25a7b608f # v1.3.1
        with:
          api-key: ${{secrets.FOSSA_API_KEY}}

I think actions: write permissions is not required.

@aditya7302 aditya7302 force-pushed the ci-schedule-token-permission branch from 1bac42c to e71813c Compare July 3, 2024 11:29
@karmada-bot karmada-bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 3, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 3, 2024

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (master@0bc96a2). Learn more about missing BASE report.
Report is 51 commits behind head on master.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #5069   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   28.21%           
=========================================
  Files             ?      632           
  Lines             ?    43568           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?    12291           
  Misses            ?    30380           
  Partials          ?      897           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 28.21% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@zhzhuang-zju zhzhuang-zju left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

others LGTM, thanks

@@ -3,6 +3,9 @@ on:
schedule:
# Run this workflow "At 18:00 UTC on Sunday and Saturday"
- cron: '0 18 * * 0,6'

permissions:
contents: read # Necessary for fetching the repository contents, enabling actions like actions/checkout@v4 to work properly.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
contents: read # Necessary for fetching the repository contents, enabling actions like actions/checkout@v4 to work properly.
contents: read

there is no need to add comment to read permissions, if have to, it should also be consistent across workflows

Signed-off-by: aditya7302 <aditya7302@gmail.com>
@aditya7302 aditya7302 force-pushed the ci-schedule-token-permission branch from e71813c to 25d5f83 Compare July 4, 2024 05:08
@zhzhuang-zju
Copy link
Contributor

thanks
/lgtm
/approve

@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 8, 2024
@karmada-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: zhzhuang-zju

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 8, 2024
@karmada-bot karmada-bot merged commit 828461a into karmada-io:master Jul 8, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants