operator/pkg/util/apiclient: unit test wait #5659
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
In this commit, we unit test the API client on waiting for API server, API service, all pods constraint, some pods constraint, and the exponential backoff utility.
karmada-bot
added
the
size/XXL
mohamedawnallah
force-pushed
the
unitTestWaitAPIClient
branch
from
122c052
to
e0f298b
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
In this commit, we unit test the API client on waiting for API server, API service, all pods constraint, some pods constraint, and the exponential backoff utility.
What type of PR is this?
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of #5491.
Depends on #5624.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: