-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: substring table name #111
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent update introduces a refinement to the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #111 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 73.90% 74.10% +0.20%
==========================================
Files 20 20
Lines 387 390 +3
Branches 37 30 -7
==========================================
+ Hits 286 289 +3
Misses 101 101 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 3
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- src/main/scala/domain/table/ddl/TableName.scala (1 hunks)
- src/test/scala/domain/table/ddl/TableNameSpec.scala (1 hunks)
@@ -1,5 +1,10 @@ | |||
package domain.table.ddl | |||
|
|||
case class TableName(private val value: String) extends AnyVal { | |||
def toSqlSentence: String = value | |||
private def maxLength = 64 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The maxLength
method is defined as a def
which means it gets evaluated every time it's accessed. For constants like maxLength
, it's more efficient to use val
instead of def
.
- private def maxLength = 64
+ private val maxLength = 64
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
private def maxLength = 64 | |
private val maxLength = 64 |
def toSqlSentence: String = if (value.length > maxLength) { | ||
value.substring(0, maxLength) | ||
} else | ||
value |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The logic for truncating the value
string to a maximum length of 64 characters is correctly implemented. However, consider encapsulating the truncation logic within a separate method for better readability and potential reuse.
def toSqlSentence: String = truncateToMaxLength(value)
private def truncateToMaxLength(value: String): String =
if (value.length > maxLength) value.substring(0, maxLength) else value
it( | ||
"if the length is 64 or more, return the truncated one after 65 truncated" | ||
) { | ||
val tableName = "a" * 65 | ||
TableName(tableName).toSqlSentence shouldBe tableName.substring(0, 64) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test description "if the length is 64 or more, return the truncated one after 65 truncated" is somewhat confusing. It would be clearer if it stated "if the length is more than 64, return the truncated string to 64 characters."
Consider rephrasing the test description for clarity:
- "if the length is 64 or more, return the truncated one after 65 truncated"
+ "if the length exceeds 64 characters, it should be truncated to 64 characters"
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
it( | |
"if the length is 64 or more, return the truncated one after 65 truncated" | |
) { | |
val tableName = "a" * 65 | |
TableName(tableName).toSqlSentence shouldBe tableName.substring(0, 64) | |
} | |
it( | |
"if the length exceeds 64 characters, it should be truncated to 64 characters" | |
) { | |
val tableName = "a" * 65 | |
TableName(tableName).toSqlSentence shouldBe tableName.substring(0, 64) | |
} |
Summary by CodeRabbit